Where's the beef? a response to Gray and Webb's ‘the return of the political in social work’

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Gray and Webb's article ‘The return of the political in social work’ is a welcome contribution to current debates. In its critique of the dominance of calculative reason, its rejection of postmodernism and identity politics, and its insistence on the need for social work to openly address issues of power and conflict, it is a useful addition to the growing critical literature concerned with challenging dominant forms of practice. That usefulness is limited, however, first by an excessively opaque style and, second, by problems associated with the writers’ argument and approach. These include: an over-reliance on Heidegger's ontology; an over-estimation of the potential of art to act as alternative paradigm; and a particularly content-less version of politics, derived from the work of Alain Badiou, which is likely to prove to be of limited value in the project of developing alternative forms of social work.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)213-217
Number of pages5
JournalInternational Journal of Social Welfare
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Mar 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

social work
politics
postmodernism
ontology
writer
art
paradigm
literature

Keywords

  • calculative reason
  • Postmodernism
  • Heidegger’s ontology
  • Alternative paradigms
  • Social Work

Cite this

@article{9c3ddf38d6e349eab1f5fcb8eddcaed5,
title = "Where's the beef?: a response to Gray and Webb's ‘the return of the political in social work’",
abstract = "Gray and Webb's article ‘The return of the political in social work’ is a welcome contribution to current debates. In its critique of the dominance of calculative reason, its rejection of postmodernism and identity politics, and its insistence on the need for social work to openly address issues of power and conflict, it is a useful addition to the growing critical literature concerned with challenging dominant forms of practice. That usefulness is limited, however, first by an excessively opaque style and, second, by problems associated with the writers’ argument and approach. These include: an over-reliance on Heidegger's ontology; an over-estimation of the potential of art to act as alternative paradigm; and a particularly content-less version of politics, derived from the work of Alain Badiou, which is likely to prove to be of limited value in the project of developing alternative forms of social work.",
keywords = "calculative reason, Postmodernism, Heidegger’s ontology, Alternative paradigms, Social Work",
author = "Iain Ferguson",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-2397.2009.00648.x",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "213--217",
journal = "International Journal of Social Welfare",
issn = "1468-2397",
publisher = "Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Where's the beef? a response to Gray and Webb's ‘the return of the political in social work’. / Ferguson, Iain.

In: International Journal of Social Welfare, Vol. 18, No. 2, 05.03.2009, p. 213-217.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Where's the beef?

T2 - a response to Gray and Webb's ‘the return of the political in social work’

AU - Ferguson, Iain

PY - 2009/3/5

Y1 - 2009/3/5

N2 - Gray and Webb's article ‘The return of the political in social work’ is a welcome contribution to current debates. In its critique of the dominance of calculative reason, its rejection of postmodernism and identity politics, and its insistence on the need for social work to openly address issues of power and conflict, it is a useful addition to the growing critical literature concerned with challenging dominant forms of practice. That usefulness is limited, however, first by an excessively opaque style and, second, by problems associated with the writers’ argument and approach. These include: an over-reliance on Heidegger's ontology; an over-estimation of the potential of art to act as alternative paradigm; and a particularly content-less version of politics, derived from the work of Alain Badiou, which is likely to prove to be of limited value in the project of developing alternative forms of social work.

AB - Gray and Webb's article ‘The return of the political in social work’ is a welcome contribution to current debates. In its critique of the dominance of calculative reason, its rejection of postmodernism and identity politics, and its insistence on the need for social work to openly address issues of power and conflict, it is a useful addition to the growing critical literature concerned with challenging dominant forms of practice. That usefulness is limited, however, first by an excessively opaque style and, second, by problems associated with the writers’ argument and approach. These include: an over-reliance on Heidegger's ontology; an over-estimation of the potential of art to act as alternative paradigm; and a particularly content-less version of politics, derived from the work of Alain Badiou, which is likely to prove to be of limited value in the project of developing alternative forms of social work.

KW - calculative reason

KW - Postmodernism

KW - Heidegger’s ontology

KW - Alternative paradigms

KW - Social Work

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2009.00648.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2009.00648.x

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 213

EP - 217

JO - International Journal of Social Welfare

JF - International Journal of Social Welfare

SN - 1468-2397

IS - 2

ER -