What’s in a line?: the influence of valence, faces, and language on pseudoneglect

Bianca Hatin; Laurie Sykes Tottenham

doi:10.1037/cep0000076

Abstract

The line bisection task is a simple and effective measure of visuospatial bias. Pseudoneglect, a leftward bias, is typically found on this task, and appears to result from right hemisphere dominance for spatial processing. In the present study (n=52) we examined the influence of other lateralised processes (emotion, language, and face processing) on line bisection performance. Line type (face, word, solid), valence (positive, negative, neutral), and hand use (left, right, both) were manipulated. Results indicate that line type and valence interact to affect the extent of pseudoneglect. The implications for pseudoneglect research are discussed.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	338
Journal	Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology
Volume	69
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000076
Publication status	Published - 8 Dec 2015
Event	Canadian Society for Brain, Behaviour and Cognitive Science (CSBBCS) Annual Meeting 2015 - Carleton University , Ottawa, Canada Duration: 5 Jun 2015 → 7 Jun 2015 Conference number: 25

Access to Document

10.1037/cep0000076

2015 12 08 Hatin et al What's

Cite this

@article{dff6de039cd84444a82929daa777c694,

title = "What{\textquoteright}s in a line?: the influence of valence, faces, and language on pseudoneglect",

abstract = "The line bisection task is a simple and effective measure of visuospatial bias. Pseudoneglect, a leftward bias, is typically found on this task, and appears to result from right hemisphere dominance for spatial processing. In the present study (n=52) we examined the influence of other lateralised processes (emotion, language, and face processing) on line bisection performance. Line type (face, word, solid), valence (positive, negative, neutral), and hand use (left, right, both) were manipulated. Results indicate that line type and valence interact to affect the extent of pseudoneglect. The implications for pseudoneglect research are discussed.",

author = "Bianca Hatin and \{Sykes Tottenham\}, Laurie",

year = "2015",

month = dec,

day = "8",

doi = "10.1037/cep0000076",

language = "English",

volume = "69",

pages = "338",

journal = "Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology",

issn = "1196-1961",

publisher = "American Psychological Association",

number = "4",

note = "Canadian Society for Brain, Behaviour and Cognitive Science (CSBBCS) Annual Meeting 2015, CSBBCS 2015 ; Conference date: 05-06-2015 Through 07-06-2015",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What’s in a line?

T2 - Canadian Society for Brain, Behaviour and Cognitive Science (CSBBCS) Annual Meeting 2015

AU - Hatin, Bianca

AU - Sykes Tottenham, Laurie

N1 - Conference code: 25

PY - 2015/12/8

Y1 - 2015/12/8

N2 - The line bisection task is a simple and effective measure of visuospatial bias. Pseudoneglect, a leftward bias, is typically found on this task, and appears to result from right hemisphere dominance for spatial processing. In the present study (n=52) we examined the influence of other lateralised processes (emotion, language, and face processing) on line bisection performance. Line type (face, word, solid), valence (positive, negative, neutral), and hand use (left, right, both) were manipulated. Results indicate that line type and valence interact to affect the extent of pseudoneglect. The implications for pseudoneglect research are discussed.

AB - The line bisection task is a simple and effective measure of visuospatial bias. Pseudoneglect, a leftward bias, is typically found on this task, and appears to result from right hemisphere dominance for spatial processing. In the present study (n=52) we examined the influence of other lateralised processes (emotion, language, and face processing) on line bisection performance. Line type (face, word, solid), valence (positive, negative, neutral), and hand use (left, right, both) were manipulated. Results indicate that line type and valence interact to affect the extent of pseudoneglect. The implications for pseudoneglect research are discussed.

UR - https://www.csbbcs.org/fileadmin/csbbcs/storage/Meeting/2015_CSBBCS_Program_Carleton.pdf

U2 - 10.1037/cep0000076

DO - 10.1037/cep0000076

M3 - Meeting Abstract

SN - 1196-1961

VL - 69

SP - 338

JO - Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology

JF - Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology

IS - 4

Y2 - 5 June 2015 through 7 June 2015

ER -

What’s in a line? the influence of valence, faces, and language on pseudoneglect

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

What's in a line? verbal, facial, and emotional influences on the line bisection task

Cite this

What’s in a line? the influence of valence, faces, and language on pseudoneglect

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Research output

What's in a line? verbal, facial, and emotional influences on the line bisection task

Cite this