What do we talk about when we talk about mentoring?

blooms and thorns

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The dialogue in the field of mentoring has changed over time. In the early days mentoring was a straightforward and pragmatic means to an end: developing others. The blooms of mentoring flowered everywhere. Then thorny issues started to be encountered, both in theory and in practice. Case studies are used here to illustrate the mixed fortunes experienced in contemporary times in three different organisations. A balance between mentoring blooms and mentoring thorns is evident in each case. Three major themes are then identified from these case studies that raise questions for the mentoring discourse. These are: different views of systems thinking, different value bases for evaluating mentoring, and different ideas about the kind of relationship mentoring ought to be. In conclusion, there is a need for a balance: between on the one hand understanding these different positions to promote dialogue and on the other hand developing rivalries to animate dialogue in the first place.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)39-49
Number of pages11
JournalBritish Journal of Guidance and Counselling
Volume31
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Mentoring
Systems Analysis
Fortune

Cite this

@article{11204b88344c4e359c57d1772e7ea13a,
title = "What do we talk about when we talk about mentoring?: blooms and thorns",
abstract = "The dialogue in the field of mentoring has changed over time. In the early days mentoring was a straightforward and pragmatic means to an end: developing others. The blooms of mentoring flowered everywhere. Then thorny issues started to be encountered, both in theory and in practice. Case studies are used here to illustrate the mixed fortunes experienced in contemporary times in three different organisations. A balance between mentoring blooms and mentoring thorns is evident in each case. Three major themes are then identified from these case studies that raise questions for the mentoring discourse. These are: different views of systems thinking, different value bases for evaluating mentoring, and different ideas about the kind of relationship mentoring ought to be. In conclusion, there is a need for a balance: between on the one hand understanding these different positions to promote dialogue and on the other hand developing rivalries to animate dialogue in the first place.",
author = "Stephen Gibb",
year = "2003",
doi = "10.1080/0306988031000086152",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "39--49",
journal = "British Journal of Guidance and Counselling",
issn = "0306-9885",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

What do we talk about when we talk about mentoring? blooms and thorns. / Gibb, Stephen.

In: British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, Vol. 31, No. 1, 2003, p. 39-49.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - What do we talk about when we talk about mentoring?

T2 - blooms and thorns

AU - Gibb, Stephen

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - The dialogue in the field of mentoring has changed over time. In the early days mentoring was a straightforward and pragmatic means to an end: developing others. The blooms of mentoring flowered everywhere. Then thorny issues started to be encountered, both in theory and in practice. Case studies are used here to illustrate the mixed fortunes experienced in contemporary times in three different organisations. A balance between mentoring blooms and mentoring thorns is evident in each case. Three major themes are then identified from these case studies that raise questions for the mentoring discourse. These are: different views of systems thinking, different value bases for evaluating mentoring, and different ideas about the kind of relationship mentoring ought to be. In conclusion, there is a need for a balance: between on the one hand understanding these different positions to promote dialogue and on the other hand developing rivalries to animate dialogue in the first place.

AB - The dialogue in the field of mentoring has changed over time. In the early days mentoring was a straightforward and pragmatic means to an end: developing others. The blooms of mentoring flowered everywhere. Then thorny issues started to be encountered, both in theory and in practice. Case studies are used here to illustrate the mixed fortunes experienced in contemporary times in three different organisations. A balance between mentoring blooms and mentoring thorns is evident in each case. Three major themes are then identified from these case studies that raise questions for the mentoring discourse. These are: different views of systems thinking, different value bases for evaluating mentoring, and different ideas about the kind of relationship mentoring ought to be. In conclusion, there is a need for a balance: between on the one hand understanding these different positions to promote dialogue and on the other hand developing rivalries to animate dialogue in the first place.

U2 - 10.1080/0306988031000086152

DO - 10.1080/0306988031000086152

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 39

EP - 49

JO - British Journal of Guidance and Counselling

JF - British Journal of Guidance and Counselling

SN - 0306-9885

IS - 1

ER -