Visual deficits in amblyopia constrain normal models of second-order motion processing

A.J. Simmers*, T. Ledgeway, C.V. Hutchinson, P.J. Knox

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

It is well established that amblyopes exhibit deficits in processing first-order (luminance-defined) patterns. This is readily manifest by measuring spatiotemporal sensitivity (i.e. the “window of visibility”) to moving luminance gratings. However the window of visibility to moving second-order (texture-defined) patterns has not been systematically studied in amblyopia. To address this issue monocular modulation sensitivity (1/threshold) to first-order motion and four different varieties of second-order motion (modulations of either the contrast, flicker, size or orientation of visual noise) was measured over a five-octave range of spatial and temporal frequencies. Compared to normals amblyopes are not only impaired in the processing of first-order motion, but overall they exhibit both higher thresholds and a much narrower window of visibility to second-order images. However amblyopia can differentially impair the perception of some types of second-order motion much more than others and crucially the precise pattern of deficits varies markedly between individuals (even for those with the same conventional visual acuity measures). For the most severely impaired amblyopes certain second-order (texture) cues to movement in the environment are effectively invisible. These results place important constraints on the possible architecture of models of second-order motion perception in human vision.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2008-2020
Number of pages13
JournalVision Research: An International Journal for Functional Aspects of Vision
Volume51
Issue number18
Early online date5 Aug 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Sept 2011
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • amblyopia
  • motion
  • second-order

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Visual deficits in amblyopia constrain normal models of second-order motion processing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this