User-centred design criteria in next generation vehicle consoles

Z. Gibson, J. Butterfield, A. Marzano

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to gauge user opinions on vehicle dashboard design to ascertain the criteria important to consumers for the next generation of automobile dashboards. The results provide insight into the aspects of dashboard design that users feel are not beneficial and thereby lead to better informed dashboard designs in the future. Participants reviewed the physical ergonomics of their vehicles very positively. However, in dashboard design and instrument panel layout they were unsure of what an ideal dashboard would look like, often showing contradictory views. Controls on the steering wheel were also well reviewed but controls near the gear stick were not. In terms of vehicle technology Satnavs received good scoring for effectiveness but were reported as distracting. IVISs were negatively reviewed. Finally, automation was reviewed as potentially improving the daily lives of individuals but trust in automation is still a problem. Overall, this study showed that whilst dashboards are relatively well reviewed there are still issues to be addressed regarding in-vehicle technology and distraction, as well as improving public opinion on automated vehicles. Results represent the first stage in research studying current dashboards and distraction of in-vehicle technology and the design of automated dashboards of the future using virtual reality environments to create optimal console designs for drivers.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)260-265
Number of pages6
JournalProcedia CIRP
Volume55
Early online date2 Nov 2016
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2 Nov 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Automation
Instrument panels
Ergonomics
Virtual reality
Automobiles
Gages
Gears
User centered design
Wheels

Keywords

  • design
  • human
  • design method
  • technology
  • automation

Cite this

Gibson, Z. ; Butterfield, J. ; Marzano, A. / User-centred design criteria in next generation vehicle consoles. In: Procedia CIRP. 2016 ; Vol. 55. pp. 260-265.
@article{b3f4352045bf425880fcf2d8a67d8df5,
title = "User-centred design criteria in next generation vehicle consoles",
abstract = "The purpose of this work is to gauge user opinions on vehicle dashboard design to ascertain the criteria important to consumers for the next generation of automobile dashboards. The results provide insight into the aspects of dashboard design that users feel are not beneficial and thereby lead to better informed dashboard designs in the future. Participants reviewed the physical ergonomics of their vehicles very positively. However, in dashboard design and instrument panel layout they were unsure of what an ideal dashboard would look like, often showing contradictory views. Controls on the steering wheel were also well reviewed but controls near the gear stick were not. In terms of vehicle technology Satnavs received good scoring for effectiveness but were reported as distracting. IVISs were negatively reviewed. Finally, automation was reviewed as potentially improving the daily lives of individuals but trust in automation is still a problem. Overall, this study showed that whilst dashboards are relatively well reviewed there are still issues to be addressed regarding in-vehicle technology and distraction, as well as improving public opinion on automated vehicles. Results represent the first stage in research studying current dashboards and distraction of in-vehicle technology and the design of automated dashboards of the future using virtual reality environments to create optimal console designs for drivers.",
keywords = "design, human, design method, technology, automation",
author = "Z. Gibson and J. Butterfield and A. Marzano",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.024",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "260--265",
journal = "Procedia CIRP",
issn = "2212-8271",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

User-centred design criteria in next generation vehicle consoles. / Gibson, Z.; Butterfield, J.; Marzano, A.

In: Procedia CIRP, Vol. 55, 02.11.2016, p. 260-265.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - User-centred design criteria in next generation vehicle consoles

AU - Gibson, Z.

AU - Butterfield, J.

AU - Marzano, A.

PY - 2016/11/2

Y1 - 2016/11/2

N2 - The purpose of this work is to gauge user opinions on vehicle dashboard design to ascertain the criteria important to consumers for the next generation of automobile dashboards. The results provide insight into the aspects of dashboard design that users feel are not beneficial and thereby lead to better informed dashboard designs in the future. Participants reviewed the physical ergonomics of their vehicles very positively. However, in dashboard design and instrument panel layout they were unsure of what an ideal dashboard would look like, often showing contradictory views. Controls on the steering wheel were also well reviewed but controls near the gear stick were not. In terms of vehicle technology Satnavs received good scoring for effectiveness but were reported as distracting. IVISs were negatively reviewed. Finally, automation was reviewed as potentially improving the daily lives of individuals but trust in automation is still a problem. Overall, this study showed that whilst dashboards are relatively well reviewed there are still issues to be addressed regarding in-vehicle technology and distraction, as well as improving public opinion on automated vehicles. Results represent the first stage in research studying current dashboards and distraction of in-vehicle technology and the design of automated dashboards of the future using virtual reality environments to create optimal console designs for drivers.

AB - The purpose of this work is to gauge user opinions on vehicle dashboard design to ascertain the criteria important to consumers for the next generation of automobile dashboards. The results provide insight into the aspects of dashboard design that users feel are not beneficial and thereby lead to better informed dashboard designs in the future. Participants reviewed the physical ergonomics of their vehicles very positively. However, in dashboard design and instrument panel layout they were unsure of what an ideal dashboard would look like, often showing contradictory views. Controls on the steering wheel were also well reviewed but controls near the gear stick were not. In terms of vehicle technology Satnavs received good scoring for effectiveness but were reported as distracting. IVISs were negatively reviewed. Finally, automation was reviewed as potentially improving the daily lives of individuals but trust in automation is still a problem. Overall, this study showed that whilst dashboards are relatively well reviewed there are still issues to be addressed regarding in-vehicle technology and distraction, as well as improving public opinion on automated vehicles. Results represent the first stage in research studying current dashboards and distraction of in-vehicle technology and the design of automated dashboards of the future using virtual reality environments to create optimal console designs for drivers.

KW - design

KW - human

KW - design method

KW - technology

KW - automation

U2 - 10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.024

DO - 10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.024

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 260

EP - 265

JO - Procedia CIRP

JF - Procedia CIRP

SN - 2212-8271

ER -