Tripping, slipping and losing the way: moving beyond methodological difficulties in social research

Anne Pirrie, Gale Macleod

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article is intended as a contribution to the debate on the epistemology of educational research. It is as much concerned with research as a social process as it is with the process of social research. The authors draw upon ways of walking, discussions of embodiment, place and materiality, and their analogues in relation to the processes of social research in order to explore alternative ways of knowing, and to explore what happens when accounts of the difficulties in conducting research are generally suppressed in sanitised reports of research findings. The distinctions between 'occupant' and 'inhabitant' knowledge, and between wayfaring and travelling betoken radically different conceptions of applied research in the social sciences. The authors explore the potential of anthropological and literary metaphors to explain the methodological challenges encountered during a specific research project: a three-year study of 'routes, destinations and outcomes' for a group of young people excluded from special schools and Pupil Referral Units, funded by the Department for Children, Schools and Families.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)367-378
JournalBritish Educational Research Journal
Volume36
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Cite this

@article{9d76cee159c247f8aa2607115913a3d7,
title = "Tripping, slipping and losing the way: moving beyond methodological difficulties in social research",
abstract = "This article is intended as a contribution to the debate on the epistemology of educational research. It is as much concerned with research as a social process as it is with the process of social research. The authors draw upon ways of walking, discussions of embodiment, place and materiality, and their analogues in relation to the processes of social research in order to explore alternative ways of knowing, and to explore what happens when accounts of the difficulties in conducting research are generally suppressed in sanitised reports of research findings. The distinctions between 'occupant' and 'inhabitant' knowledge, and between wayfaring and travelling betoken radically different conceptions of applied research in the social sciences. The authors explore the potential of anthropological and literary metaphors to explain the methodological challenges encountered during a specific research project: a three-year study of 'routes, destinations and outcomes' for a group of young people excluded from special schools and Pupil Referral Units, funded by the Department for Children, Schools and Families.",
author = "Anne Pirrie and Gale Macleod",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1080/01411920902935816",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "367--378",
journal = "British Educational Research Journal",
issn = "0141-1926",
publisher = "British Educational Research Association",
number = "3",

}

Tripping, slipping and losing the way: moving beyond methodological difficulties in social research. / Pirrie, Anne; Macleod, Gale.

In: British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 36, No. 3, 2010, p. 367-378.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tripping, slipping and losing the way: moving beyond methodological difficulties in social research

AU - Pirrie, Anne

AU - Macleod, Gale

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - This article is intended as a contribution to the debate on the epistemology of educational research. It is as much concerned with research as a social process as it is with the process of social research. The authors draw upon ways of walking, discussions of embodiment, place and materiality, and their analogues in relation to the processes of social research in order to explore alternative ways of knowing, and to explore what happens when accounts of the difficulties in conducting research are generally suppressed in sanitised reports of research findings. The distinctions between 'occupant' and 'inhabitant' knowledge, and between wayfaring and travelling betoken radically different conceptions of applied research in the social sciences. The authors explore the potential of anthropological and literary metaphors to explain the methodological challenges encountered during a specific research project: a three-year study of 'routes, destinations and outcomes' for a group of young people excluded from special schools and Pupil Referral Units, funded by the Department for Children, Schools and Families.

AB - This article is intended as a contribution to the debate on the epistemology of educational research. It is as much concerned with research as a social process as it is with the process of social research. The authors draw upon ways of walking, discussions of embodiment, place and materiality, and their analogues in relation to the processes of social research in order to explore alternative ways of knowing, and to explore what happens when accounts of the difficulties in conducting research are generally suppressed in sanitised reports of research findings. The distinctions between 'occupant' and 'inhabitant' knowledge, and between wayfaring and travelling betoken radically different conceptions of applied research in the social sciences. The authors explore the potential of anthropological and literary metaphors to explain the methodological challenges encountered during a specific research project: a three-year study of 'routes, destinations and outcomes' for a group of young people excluded from special schools and Pupil Referral Units, funded by the Department for Children, Schools and Families.

U2 - 10.1080/01411920902935816

DO - 10.1080/01411920902935816

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 367

EP - 378

JO - British Educational Research Journal

JF - British Educational Research Journal

SN - 0141-1926

IS - 3

ER -