Time-cost performance effect of change orders from accelerated contract provisions

Kunhee Choi, Hyun Woo Lee, Junseo Bae, David Bilbo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Accelerated contract provisions (ACPs) such as cost-plus-time (A+B) and incentives/disincentives (I/D) are increasingly common, yet very little is known about their pure time-cost performance effects on change orders. To fill this large knowledge gap, a two-stage research methodology drawing on 1,372 highway improvement projects completed in California was adopted for this study. The Stage I study investigated the marginal change-order impacts of two ACPs, pure A+B and I/D combined with A+B. How ACP change orders affect projects’ time-cost performance was numerically modeled and successfully validated over the Stage II study. The results clearly showed that both ACPs led to more schedule-change and cost-change orders than conventionally contracted projects, whereas I/D combined with A+B performed significantly better than pure A+B in terms of the magnitude of schedule-change orders. This conveys an important recommendation to state transportation agencies (STAs) that A+B be used with an I/D provision. The results and numerical models of this study would help STAs better assess and justify the impact of change orders on the duration and cost of projects, enabling them to more effectively use contingency amounts. Use of the models can also benefit contractors requesting a change order because the models can provide them with advanced knowledge of the probable time-cost growth rates specifically for the pursued ACP.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume142
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Costs
Contractors
Time costs
Change orders
Numerical models
Incentives
Schedule

Cite this

@article{6d11276003624d2b8edd115045bb8a2e,
title = "Time-cost performance effect of change orders from accelerated contract provisions",
abstract = "Accelerated contract provisions (ACPs) such as cost-plus-time (A+B) and incentives/disincentives (I/D) are increasingly common, yet very little is known about their pure time-cost performance effects on change orders. To fill this large knowledge gap, a two-stage research methodology drawing on 1,372 highway improvement projects completed in California was adopted for this study. The Stage I study investigated the marginal change-order impacts of two ACPs, pure A+B and I/D combined with A+B. How ACP change orders affect projects’ time-cost performance was numerically modeled and successfully validated over the Stage II study. The results clearly showed that both ACPs led to more schedule-change and cost-change orders than conventionally contracted projects, whereas I/D combined with A+B performed significantly better than pure A+B in terms of the magnitude of schedule-change orders. This conveys an important recommendation to state transportation agencies (STAs) that A+B be used with an I/D provision. The results and numerical models of this study would help STAs better assess and justify the impact of change orders on the duration and cost of projects, enabling them to more effectively use contingency amounts. Use of the models can also benefit contractors requesting a change order because the models can provide them with advanced knowledge of the probable time-cost growth rates specifically for the pursued ACP.",
author = "Kunhee Choi and Lee, {Hyun Woo} and Junseo Bae and David Bilbo",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001071",
language = "English",
volume = "142",
journal = "Journal of Construction Engineering and Management",
issn = "0733-9364",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers",
number = "3",

}

Time-cost performance effect of change orders from accelerated contract provisions. / Choi, Kunhee; Lee, Hyun Woo; Bae, Junseo; Bilbo, David.

In: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 142, No. 3, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Time-cost performance effect of change orders from accelerated contract provisions

AU - Choi, Kunhee

AU - Lee, Hyun Woo

AU - Bae, Junseo

AU - Bilbo, David

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Accelerated contract provisions (ACPs) such as cost-plus-time (A+B) and incentives/disincentives (I/D) are increasingly common, yet very little is known about their pure time-cost performance effects on change orders. To fill this large knowledge gap, a two-stage research methodology drawing on 1,372 highway improvement projects completed in California was adopted for this study. The Stage I study investigated the marginal change-order impacts of two ACPs, pure A+B and I/D combined with A+B. How ACP change orders affect projects’ time-cost performance was numerically modeled and successfully validated over the Stage II study. The results clearly showed that both ACPs led to more schedule-change and cost-change orders than conventionally contracted projects, whereas I/D combined with A+B performed significantly better than pure A+B in terms of the magnitude of schedule-change orders. This conveys an important recommendation to state transportation agencies (STAs) that A+B be used with an I/D provision. The results and numerical models of this study would help STAs better assess and justify the impact of change orders on the duration and cost of projects, enabling them to more effectively use contingency amounts. Use of the models can also benefit contractors requesting a change order because the models can provide them with advanced knowledge of the probable time-cost growth rates specifically for the pursued ACP.

AB - Accelerated contract provisions (ACPs) such as cost-plus-time (A+B) and incentives/disincentives (I/D) are increasingly common, yet very little is known about their pure time-cost performance effects on change orders. To fill this large knowledge gap, a two-stage research methodology drawing on 1,372 highway improvement projects completed in California was adopted for this study. The Stage I study investigated the marginal change-order impacts of two ACPs, pure A+B and I/D combined with A+B. How ACP change orders affect projects’ time-cost performance was numerically modeled and successfully validated over the Stage II study. The results clearly showed that both ACPs led to more schedule-change and cost-change orders than conventionally contracted projects, whereas I/D combined with A+B performed significantly better than pure A+B in terms of the magnitude of schedule-change orders. This conveys an important recommendation to state transportation agencies (STAs) that A+B be used with an I/D provision. The results and numerical models of this study would help STAs better assess and justify the impact of change orders on the duration and cost of projects, enabling them to more effectively use contingency amounts. Use of the models can also benefit contractors requesting a change order because the models can provide them with advanced knowledge of the probable time-cost growth rates specifically for the pursued ACP.

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001071

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001071

M3 - Article

VL - 142

JO - Journal of Construction Engineering and Management

JF - Journal of Construction Engineering and Management

SN - 0733-9364

IS - 3

ER -