The value of 'bearing witness' to desistance

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Abstract
This paper aims to contribute to the debate on making probation practice ‘desistance-focused’. It does this through considering the body of knowledge on responding to trauma through ‘bearing witness’ to the person’s story – attending to their values and lived experience – and applying this to probation practice. It addresses why the literature on trauma has relevance to work with people who have offended. Then it explores the epistemological, performative, moral and political dimensions of ‘bearing witness’ and the relevance of each of these to desistance. It highlights the potentially critical role of the audience (in this case the probation practitioner) in the co-construction of the desistance narrative. Additionally, the paper argues that insufficient attention has been paid to the moral space in which such narratives are co-constructed. In a context where the voices of people who have offended are silenced and their experiences of victimisation or structural violence are written out, I suggest that ‘being present and being with another’ (Naef, 2006: 146) enacts a moral responsibility to support a transition from object to subject and to recognise and endorse the humanity of those who have committed crimes. The paper provides a practice example of ‘bearing witness’ to desistance. Finally, it addresses potential
challenges in asking probation officers to ‘bear witness’ to desistance.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)408–424
Number of pages17
JournalProbation Journal
Volume63
Issue number4
Early online date31 Aug 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

witness
probation
trauma
Values
probation officer
structural violence
narrative
victimization
experience
offense
responsibility
human being
knowledge

Keywords

  • desistance
  • trauma
  • narratives
  • recovery
  • bearing witness
  • disadvantage
  • exclusion/social exclusion
  • probation
  • psychological trauma
  • testimony
  • victimization

Cite this

@article{a78c029ec3214cc8a4a9b288f4d2dd1f,
title = "The value of 'bearing witness' to desistance",
abstract = "AbstractThis paper aims to contribute to the debate on making probation practice ‘desistance-focused’. It does this through considering the body of knowledge on responding to trauma through ‘bearing witness’ to the person’s story – attending to their values and lived experience – and applying this to probation practice. It addresses why the literature on trauma has relevance to work with people who have offended. Then it explores the epistemological, performative, moral and political dimensions of ‘bearing witness’ and the relevance of each of these to desistance. It highlights the potentially critical role of the audience (in this case the probation practitioner) in the co-construction of the desistance narrative. Additionally, the paper argues that insufficient attention has been paid to the moral space in which such narratives are co-constructed. In a context where the voices of people who have offended are silenced and their experiences of victimisation or structural violence are written out, I suggest that ‘being present and being with another’ (Naef, 2006: 146) enacts a moral responsibility to support a transition from object to subject and to recognise and endorse the humanity of those who have committed crimes. The paper provides a practice example of ‘bearing witness’ to desistance. Finally, it addresses potentialchallenges in asking probation officers to ‘bear witness’ to desistance.",
keywords = "desistance, trauma, narratives, recovery, bearing witness, disadvantage, exclusion/social exclusion, probation, psychological trauma, testimony, victimization",
author = "Sarah Anderson",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0264550516664146",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "408–424",
journal = "Probation Journal",
issn = "0264-5505",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "4",

}

The value of 'bearing witness' to desistance. / Anderson, Sarah.

In: Probation Journal, Vol. 63, No. 4, 01.12.2016, p. 408–424.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The value of 'bearing witness' to desistance

AU - Anderson, Sarah

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - AbstractThis paper aims to contribute to the debate on making probation practice ‘desistance-focused’. It does this through considering the body of knowledge on responding to trauma through ‘bearing witness’ to the person’s story – attending to their values and lived experience – and applying this to probation practice. It addresses why the literature on trauma has relevance to work with people who have offended. Then it explores the epistemological, performative, moral and political dimensions of ‘bearing witness’ and the relevance of each of these to desistance. It highlights the potentially critical role of the audience (in this case the probation practitioner) in the co-construction of the desistance narrative. Additionally, the paper argues that insufficient attention has been paid to the moral space in which such narratives are co-constructed. In a context where the voices of people who have offended are silenced and their experiences of victimisation or structural violence are written out, I suggest that ‘being present and being with another’ (Naef, 2006: 146) enacts a moral responsibility to support a transition from object to subject and to recognise and endorse the humanity of those who have committed crimes. The paper provides a practice example of ‘bearing witness’ to desistance. Finally, it addresses potentialchallenges in asking probation officers to ‘bear witness’ to desistance.

AB - AbstractThis paper aims to contribute to the debate on making probation practice ‘desistance-focused’. It does this through considering the body of knowledge on responding to trauma through ‘bearing witness’ to the person’s story – attending to their values and lived experience – and applying this to probation practice. It addresses why the literature on trauma has relevance to work with people who have offended. Then it explores the epistemological, performative, moral and political dimensions of ‘bearing witness’ and the relevance of each of these to desistance. It highlights the potentially critical role of the audience (in this case the probation practitioner) in the co-construction of the desistance narrative. Additionally, the paper argues that insufficient attention has been paid to the moral space in which such narratives are co-constructed. In a context where the voices of people who have offended are silenced and their experiences of victimisation or structural violence are written out, I suggest that ‘being present and being with another’ (Naef, 2006: 146) enacts a moral responsibility to support a transition from object to subject and to recognise and endorse the humanity of those who have committed crimes. The paper provides a practice example of ‘bearing witness’ to desistance. Finally, it addresses potentialchallenges in asking probation officers to ‘bear witness’ to desistance.

KW - desistance

KW - trauma

KW - narratives

KW - recovery

KW - bearing witness

KW - disadvantage

KW - exclusion/social exclusion

KW - probation

KW - psychological trauma

KW - testimony

KW - victimization

U2 - 10.1177/0264550516664146

DO - 10.1177/0264550516664146

M3 - Article

VL - 63

SP - 408

EP - 424

JO - Probation Journal

JF - Probation Journal

SN - 0264-5505

IS - 4

ER -