The sustainability of knowledge brokerage of the mental health improvement outcomes framework in Scotland: a follow-up analysis

John Connolly, Garth Reid, Monja Knoll, Shirley Windsor, Wendy Halliday

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)
    292 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This is a follow-up study to Reid et al. (2017) which considered the barriers and
    facilitators of getting knowledge into policy when using a knowledge brokering
    approach. The previous study analysed the use of strategies to reduce barriers to the use of evidence in mental health strategy planning in Scotland using outcome frameworks. The main facilitators highlighted were the importance of local champions, cooperation within partnership networks, and national-level support. The barriers were local implementation cultures, local time pressures, perceived complexities of the framework, and timeliness of the framework. The present article details the results of a follow-up qualitative evaluation of the sustainability of the mental health improvement outcomes framework with local planners. There is a dearth of literature which focuses on the sustainability of outcome frameworks and the findings of this study suggest that the barriers highlighted by Reid et al. (2017) remain acute issues. However, there are
    further aspects for learning for knowledge brokers themselves in terms of national and local relations and the wider challenges and opportunities relating to network governance and policy reform agendas.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)177-195
    Number of pages19
    Journal Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice
    Volume16
    Issue number1
    Early online date14 Mar 2018
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 29 Feb 2020

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The sustainability of knowledge brokerage of the mental health improvement outcomes framework in Scotland: a follow-up analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this