The stagnation, fall and rise of Singapore’s political opposition, 1996-2013

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Drawing upon personal interviews, I present the opinions of leading Singaporean opposition politicians and activists about developments and issues in Singapore politics covering the period 1996-2013, which I characterise as a period of stagnation, fall and rise for the opposition. The purpose of the article is to explore and understand the history of Singapore’s opposition, as experienced and told by participants in the drama. I attended opposition social functions in order to understand more about the movement and to gain access to study participants whom I then interviewed, mostly on a one-on-one basis. The sampling method used can best be described as snowball sampling, working in conjunction with convenience sampling. My aim was to interview people of a mix of genders, ages, party affiliations, and politician-versus-activist status. Most of the interviews with my 24 interviewees were conducted over the period March 2010 to October 2011. My interview results show that the Singapore opposition activist community, while small outside of election campaigns during this era (probably numbering no more than fifty), was passionate and committed to taking the city-state away from what its members perceived to be the authoritarian pathway set up by the ruling regime. The Workers’ Party’s (WP) rapid rise from obscurity to become Singapore’s second-strongest political force over the 2006-13 period surprised many commentators. The WP’s ability to secure high vote percentages and even win seats based on brand factor alone (or primarily) was an important new development.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)37-56
Number of pages20
JournalAmerican Journal of Qualitative Research
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Jun 2019

Fingerprint

stagnation
Singapore
opposition
interview
politician
social function
election campaign
drama
voter
regime
worker
politics
gender
ability
history
community

Keywords

  • Grassroots Activism
  • Internet Activism
  • Singapore Opposition Parties
  • Singapore Political History
  • Singapore Politics

Cite this

@article{190183990a6142f29ac70a4fc6361017,
title = "The stagnation, fall and rise of Singapore’s political opposition, 1996-2013",
abstract = "Drawing upon personal interviews, I present the opinions of leading Singaporean opposition politicians and activists about developments and issues in Singapore politics covering the period 1996-2013, which I characterise as a period of stagnation, fall and rise for the opposition. The purpose of the article is to explore and understand the history of Singapore’s opposition, as experienced and told by participants in the drama. I attended opposition social functions in order to understand more about the movement and to gain access to study participants whom I then interviewed, mostly on a one-on-one basis. The sampling method used can best be described as snowball sampling, working in conjunction with convenience sampling. My aim was to interview people of a mix of genders, ages, party affiliations, and politician-versus-activist status. Most of the interviews with my 24 interviewees were conducted over the period March 2010 to October 2011. My interview results show that the Singapore opposition activist community, while small outside of election campaigns during this era (probably numbering no more than fifty), was passionate and committed to taking the city-state away from what its members perceived to be the authoritarian pathway set up by the ruling regime. The Workers’ Party’s (WP) rapid rise from obscurity to become Singapore’s second-strongest political force over the 2006-13 period surprised many commentators. The WP’s ability to secure high vote percentages and even win seats based on brand factor alone (or primarily) was an important new development.",
keywords = "Grassroots Activism, Internet Activism, Singapore Opposition Parties, Singapore Political History, Singapore Politics",
author = "Kieran James",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "12",
doi = "10.29333/ajqr/5810",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "37--56",
journal = "American Journal of Qualitative Research",
issn = "2576-2141",
publisher = "Florida Gulf Coast University",
number = "1",

}

The stagnation, fall and rise of Singapore’s political opposition, 1996-2013. / James, Kieran.

In: American Journal of Qualitative Research , Vol. 3, No. 1, 12.06.2019, p. 37-56.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The stagnation, fall and rise of Singapore’s political opposition, 1996-2013

AU - James, Kieran

PY - 2019/6/12

Y1 - 2019/6/12

N2 - Drawing upon personal interviews, I present the opinions of leading Singaporean opposition politicians and activists about developments and issues in Singapore politics covering the period 1996-2013, which I characterise as a period of stagnation, fall and rise for the opposition. The purpose of the article is to explore and understand the history of Singapore’s opposition, as experienced and told by participants in the drama. I attended opposition social functions in order to understand more about the movement and to gain access to study participants whom I then interviewed, mostly on a one-on-one basis. The sampling method used can best be described as snowball sampling, working in conjunction with convenience sampling. My aim was to interview people of a mix of genders, ages, party affiliations, and politician-versus-activist status. Most of the interviews with my 24 interviewees were conducted over the period March 2010 to October 2011. My interview results show that the Singapore opposition activist community, while small outside of election campaigns during this era (probably numbering no more than fifty), was passionate and committed to taking the city-state away from what its members perceived to be the authoritarian pathway set up by the ruling regime. The Workers’ Party’s (WP) rapid rise from obscurity to become Singapore’s second-strongest political force over the 2006-13 period surprised many commentators. The WP’s ability to secure high vote percentages and even win seats based on brand factor alone (or primarily) was an important new development.

AB - Drawing upon personal interviews, I present the opinions of leading Singaporean opposition politicians and activists about developments and issues in Singapore politics covering the period 1996-2013, which I characterise as a period of stagnation, fall and rise for the opposition. The purpose of the article is to explore and understand the history of Singapore’s opposition, as experienced and told by participants in the drama. I attended opposition social functions in order to understand more about the movement and to gain access to study participants whom I then interviewed, mostly on a one-on-one basis. The sampling method used can best be described as snowball sampling, working in conjunction with convenience sampling. My aim was to interview people of a mix of genders, ages, party affiliations, and politician-versus-activist status. Most of the interviews with my 24 interviewees were conducted over the period March 2010 to October 2011. My interview results show that the Singapore opposition activist community, while small outside of election campaigns during this era (probably numbering no more than fifty), was passionate and committed to taking the city-state away from what its members perceived to be the authoritarian pathway set up by the ruling regime. The Workers’ Party’s (WP) rapid rise from obscurity to become Singapore’s second-strongest political force over the 2006-13 period surprised many commentators. The WP’s ability to secure high vote percentages and even win seats based on brand factor alone (or primarily) was an important new development.

KW - Grassroots Activism

KW - Internet Activism

KW - Singapore Opposition Parties

KW - Singapore Political History

KW - Singapore Politics

U2 - 10.29333/ajqr/5810

DO - 10.29333/ajqr/5810

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 37

EP - 56

JO - American Journal of Qualitative Research

JF - American Journal of Qualitative Research

SN - 2576-2141

IS - 1

ER -