The role of different types of anaphor in the on line resolution of sentences in a discourse.

S Garrod, D Freudenthal, E. Boyle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Interpreting sentences as part of a larger discourse requires evaluating information in the sentence against the current discourse representation. This paper examines the time course of such sentence resolution processes in two eye-tracking experiments. The experimental passages contained verbs depicting contextually congruent or incongruent events depending upon which of two possible antecedents were assigned to an anaphor. In Experiment 1, immediate effects of detecting the incongruence were found in first pass fixations on the verb but only when the sentences contained pronouns referring unambiguously to focused discourse antecedents. In Experiment 2 where matching name and definite description anaphors were used, the congruence effects were delayed until the second pass refixations of the verb and anaphor. The results are interpreted in relation to the different discourse roles played by different anaphoric devices and considered in relation to Sanford and Garrod′s (1981) Memory Focus model.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)39-68
Number of pages30
JournalJournal of Memory and Language
Volume33
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Names
Equipment and Supplies
discourse
experiment
Experiments
Data storage equipment
Discourse
event
Verbs
Experiment

Cite this

@article{b63f6f4d1fcf46608944afcc0959f360,
title = "The role of different types of anaphor in the on line resolution of sentences in a discourse.",
abstract = "Interpreting sentences as part of a larger discourse requires evaluating information in the sentence against the current discourse representation. This paper examines the time course of such sentence resolution processes in two eye-tracking experiments. The experimental passages contained verbs depicting contextually congruent or incongruent events depending upon which of two possible antecedents were assigned to an anaphor. In Experiment 1, immediate effects of detecting the incongruence were found in first pass fixations on the verb but only when the sentences contained pronouns referring unambiguously to focused discourse antecedents. In Experiment 2 where matching name and definite description anaphors were used, the congruence effects were delayed until the second pass refixations of the verb and anaphor. The results are interpreted in relation to the different discourse roles played by different anaphoric devices and considered in relation to Sanford and Garrod′s (1981) Memory Focus model.",
author = "S Garrod and D Freudenthal and E. Boyle",
year = "1994",
doi = "10.1006/jmla.1994.1003",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "39--68",
journal = "Journal of Memory and Language",
issn = "0749-596X",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",
number = "1",

}

The role of different types of anaphor in the on line resolution of sentences in a discourse. / Garrod, S; Freudenthal, D; Boyle, E.

In: Journal of Memory and Language, Vol. 33, No. 1, 1994, p. 39-68.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of different types of anaphor in the on line resolution of sentences in a discourse.

AU - Garrod, S

AU - Freudenthal, D

AU - Boyle, E.

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - Interpreting sentences as part of a larger discourse requires evaluating information in the sentence against the current discourse representation. This paper examines the time course of such sentence resolution processes in two eye-tracking experiments. The experimental passages contained verbs depicting contextually congruent or incongruent events depending upon which of two possible antecedents were assigned to an anaphor. In Experiment 1, immediate effects of detecting the incongruence were found in first pass fixations on the verb but only when the sentences contained pronouns referring unambiguously to focused discourse antecedents. In Experiment 2 where matching name and definite description anaphors were used, the congruence effects were delayed until the second pass refixations of the verb and anaphor. The results are interpreted in relation to the different discourse roles played by different anaphoric devices and considered in relation to Sanford and Garrod′s (1981) Memory Focus model.

AB - Interpreting sentences as part of a larger discourse requires evaluating information in the sentence against the current discourse representation. This paper examines the time course of such sentence resolution processes in two eye-tracking experiments. The experimental passages contained verbs depicting contextually congruent or incongruent events depending upon which of two possible antecedents were assigned to an anaphor. In Experiment 1, immediate effects of detecting the incongruence were found in first pass fixations on the verb but only when the sentences contained pronouns referring unambiguously to focused discourse antecedents. In Experiment 2 where matching name and definite description anaphors were used, the congruence effects were delayed until the second pass refixations of the verb and anaphor. The results are interpreted in relation to the different discourse roles played by different anaphoric devices and considered in relation to Sanford and Garrod′s (1981) Memory Focus model.

U2 - 10.1006/jmla.1994.1003

DO - 10.1006/jmla.1994.1003

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 39

EP - 68

JO - Journal of Memory and Language

JF - Journal of Memory and Language

SN - 0749-596X

IS - 1

ER -