The Neo-Gramscians in the study of international relations: an appraisal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this article I provide an appraisal of the neo-Gramscian approach to the study of international relations by focusing on three of its major exponents: Robert Cox, Stephen Gill and Adam Morton. I argue that neo-Gramscians have yet to adequately address some important challenges and criticisms of their method around its overly " top-down " mode of analysis, its neglect of forms of resistance and its excessively global and cosmopolitan account of neoliberal hegemony and especially resistance. I maintain that a return to the letter of Gramsci's writings on hegemony and its national-popular and democratic character would not only allow neo-Gramscians to address more effectively these weaknesses, but also strengthen their approach and align it more effectively with trends in contemporary politics.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)93-114
Number of pages21
JournalMaterialismo Storico
Volume2
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2017

Fingerprint

hegemony
international relations
neglect
criticism
politics
trend

Keywords

  • Gramsci
  • International Relations
  • Hegemony
  • National-popular

Cite this

@article{758e3d7dc95647999271e280b4c955e4,
title = "The Neo-Gramscians in the study of international relations: an appraisal",
abstract = "In this article I provide an appraisal of the neo-Gramscian approach to the study of international relations by focusing on three of its major exponents: Robert Cox, Stephen Gill and Adam Morton. I argue that neo-Gramscians have yet to adequately address some important challenges and criticisms of their method around its overly {"} top-down {"} mode of analysis, its neglect of forms of resistance and its excessively global and cosmopolitan account of neoliberal hegemony and especially resistance. I maintain that a return to the letter of Gramsci's writings on hegemony and its national-popular and democratic character would not only allow neo-Gramscians to address more effectively these weaknesses, but also strengthen their approach and align it more effectively with trends in contemporary politics.",
keywords = "Gramsci, International Relations, Hegemony, National-popular",
author = "Mark McNally",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "93--114",
journal = "Materialismo Storico",
issn = "2531-9582",
publisher = "University of Urbino",
number = "1",

}

The Neo-Gramscians in the study of international relations : an appraisal. / McNally, Mark.

In: Materialismo Storico, Vol. 2, No. 1, 06.2017, p. 93-114.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Neo-Gramscians in the study of international relations

T2 - an appraisal

AU - McNally, Mark

PY - 2017/6

Y1 - 2017/6

N2 - In this article I provide an appraisal of the neo-Gramscian approach to the study of international relations by focusing on three of its major exponents: Robert Cox, Stephen Gill and Adam Morton. I argue that neo-Gramscians have yet to adequately address some important challenges and criticisms of their method around its overly " top-down " mode of analysis, its neglect of forms of resistance and its excessively global and cosmopolitan account of neoliberal hegemony and especially resistance. I maintain that a return to the letter of Gramsci's writings on hegemony and its national-popular and democratic character would not only allow neo-Gramscians to address more effectively these weaknesses, but also strengthen their approach and align it more effectively with trends in contemporary politics.

AB - In this article I provide an appraisal of the neo-Gramscian approach to the study of international relations by focusing on three of its major exponents: Robert Cox, Stephen Gill and Adam Morton. I argue that neo-Gramscians have yet to adequately address some important challenges and criticisms of their method around its overly " top-down " mode of analysis, its neglect of forms of resistance and its excessively global and cosmopolitan account of neoliberal hegemony and especially resistance. I maintain that a return to the letter of Gramsci's writings on hegemony and its national-popular and democratic character would not only allow neo-Gramscians to address more effectively these weaknesses, but also strengthen their approach and align it more effectively with trends in contemporary politics.

KW - Gramsci

KW - International Relations

KW - Hegemony

KW - National-popular

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 93

EP - 114

JO - Materialismo Storico

JF - Materialismo Storico

SN - 2531-9582

IS - 1

ER -