The influence of receiver status on donor prosociality in 6- to 11-year-old children

Nicola McGuigan, Ruth Fisher, Rory Glasgow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore the interplay between donor prosociality and receiver status using a fixed-choice resource distribution paradigm. Sixty children aged 6-11 years allocated resources to two high-status adults and two lower status adults under three different payoff structures. The donor could choose between an egalitarian option and an option that either resulted in an allocation that favored either the donor (Prosocial) or the receiver (Envy), or one in which the donor sacrificed resources to maintain parity (Costly Sharing). The results showed that the interplay between receiver status, donor age, and the payoff structure was complex, with children displaying selective generosity in which the status of the receiver played a key role.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)855–869
JournalChild Development
Volume87
Issue number3
Early online date25 Mar 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Tissue Donors
Parity

Cite this

McGuigan, Nicola ; Fisher, Ruth ; Glasgow, Rory. / The influence of receiver status on donor prosociality in 6- to 11-year-old children. In: Child Development. 2016 ; Vol. 87, No. 3. pp. 855–869.
@article{6f36762342a14f858f12084fe4d4d738,
title = "The influence of receiver status on donor prosociality in 6- to 11-year-old children",
abstract = "The aim of this study was to explore the interplay between donor prosociality and receiver status using a fixed-choice resource distribution paradigm. Sixty children aged 6-11 years allocated resources to two high-status adults and two lower status adults under three different payoff structures. The donor could choose between an egalitarian option and an option that either resulted in an allocation that favored either the donor (Prosocial) or the receiver (Envy), or one in which the donor sacrificed resources to maintain parity (Costly Sharing). The results showed that the interplay between receiver status, donor age, and the payoff structure was complex, with children displaying selective generosity in which the status of the receiver played a key role.",
author = "Nicola McGuigan and Ruth Fisher and Rory Glasgow",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/cdev.12517",
language = "English",
volume = "87",
pages = "855–869",
journal = "Child Development",
issn = "0009-3920",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

The influence of receiver status on donor prosociality in 6- to 11-year-old children. / McGuigan, Nicola; Fisher, Ruth; Glasgow, Rory.

In: Child Development, Vol. 87, No. 3, 01.05.2016, p. 855–869.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The influence of receiver status on donor prosociality in 6- to 11-year-old children

AU - McGuigan, Nicola

AU - Fisher, Ruth

AU - Glasgow, Rory

PY - 2016/5/1

Y1 - 2016/5/1

N2 - The aim of this study was to explore the interplay between donor prosociality and receiver status using a fixed-choice resource distribution paradigm. Sixty children aged 6-11 years allocated resources to two high-status adults and two lower status adults under three different payoff structures. The donor could choose between an egalitarian option and an option that either resulted in an allocation that favored either the donor (Prosocial) or the receiver (Envy), or one in which the donor sacrificed resources to maintain parity (Costly Sharing). The results showed that the interplay between receiver status, donor age, and the payoff structure was complex, with children displaying selective generosity in which the status of the receiver played a key role.

AB - The aim of this study was to explore the interplay between donor prosociality and receiver status using a fixed-choice resource distribution paradigm. Sixty children aged 6-11 years allocated resources to two high-status adults and two lower status adults under three different payoff structures. The donor could choose between an egalitarian option and an option that either resulted in an allocation that favored either the donor (Prosocial) or the receiver (Envy), or one in which the donor sacrificed resources to maintain parity (Costly Sharing). The results showed that the interplay between receiver status, donor age, and the payoff structure was complex, with children displaying selective generosity in which the status of the receiver played a key role.

U2 - 10.1111/cdev.12517

DO - 10.1111/cdev.12517

M3 - Article

VL - 87

SP - 855

EP - 869

JO - Child Development

JF - Child Development

SN - 0009-3920

IS - 3

ER -