The influence of business case studies and learning styles in an accounting course: a comment

Angus Duff, Alistair Dobie, Xin Guo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Given the continuing interest concerning both the use of case studies and learning styles in accounting education, the recent papers by Adler, R., Whiting, R.H. and Wynn-Williams, K. (2004), and Wynn-Williams, K., Whiting, R.H. and Adler, A. (2008) in this journal are to be welcomed. They both present evidence of their use of business case studies (BCS) in an intermediate-level accounting course in a New Zealand university, measuring students' learning styles before and after the BCS intervention. Both studies fail to report any statistically significant changes in learning styles on two of those years, and reports that learning styles have a bearing upon performance. The papers present an interesting and topical account of the use of BCS in an accounting course over an extended period. However, in our view their applied use of learning styles and the Learning Styles Inventory II (LSI-1985) in this context is methodologically questionable. This comment indicates how future research might build on their exploratory work. Issues of concern include the literature base, the psychometric properties of scores produced by the LSI-1985, and analysis and disclosure of results.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)129
Number of pages144
JournalAccounting Education
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

learning
psychometrics
Learning styles
Business case
New Zealand
university
performance
evidence
education
student
literature
Disclosure
Student learning
Psychometrics
Accounting education

Keywords

  • learning styles
  • approaches to learning
  • LSI-1985
  • psychometric measurement

Cite this

@article{c2a5e647f9534a238ccafc03a4823e72,
title = "The influence of business case studies and learning styles in an accounting course: a comment",
abstract = "Given the continuing interest concerning both the use of case studies and learning styles in accounting education, the recent papers by Adler, R., Whiting, R.H. and Wynn-Williams, K. (2004), and Wynn-Williams, K., Whiting, R.H. and Adler, A. (2008) in this journal are to be welcomed. They both present evidence of their use of business case studies (BCS) in an intermediate-level accounting course in a New Zealand university, measuring students' learning styles before and after the BCS intervention. Both studies fail to report any statistically significant changes in learning styles on two of those years, and reports that learning styles have a bearing upon performance. The papers present an interesting and topical account of the use of BCS in an accounting course over an extended period. However, in our view their applied use of learning styles and the Learning Styles Inventory II (LSI-1985) in this context is methodologically questionable. This comment indicates how future research might build on their exploratory work. Issues of concern include the literature base, the psychometric properties of scores produced by the LSI-1985, and analysis and disclosure of results.",
keywords = "learning styles, approaches to learning, LSI-1985, psychometric measurement",
author = "Angus Duff and Alistair Dobie and Xin Guo",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1080/09639280701788729",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "129",
journal = "Accounting Education",
issn = "0963-9284",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

The influence of business case studies and learning styles in an accounting course : a comment. / Duff, Angus; Dobie, Alistair; Guo, Xin.

In: Accounting Education, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2008, p. 129.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The influence of business case studies and learning styles in an accounting course

T2 - a comment

AU - Duff, Angus

AU - Dobie, Alistair

AU - Guo, Xin

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Given the continuing interest concerning both the use of case studies and learning styles in accounting education, the recent papers by Adler, R., Whiting, R.H. and Wynn-Williams, K. (2004), and Wynn-Williams, K., Whiting, R.H. and Adler, A. (2008) in this journal are to be welcomed. They both present evidence of their use of business case studies (BCS) in an intermediate-level accounting course in a New Zealand university, measuring students' learning styles before and after the BCS intervention. Both studies fail to report any statistically significant changes in learning styles on two of those years, and reports that learning styles have a bearing upon performance. The papers present an interesting and topical account of the use of BCS in an accounting course over an extended period. However, in our view their applied use of learning styles and the Learning Styles Inventory II (LSI-1985) in this context is methodologically questionable. This comment indicates how future research might build on their exploratory work. Issues of concern include the literature base, the psychometric properties of scores produced by the LSI-1985, and analysis and disclosure of results.

AB - Given the continuing interest concerning both the use of case studies and learning styles in accounting education, the recent papers by Adler, R., Whiting, R.H. and Wynn-Williams, K. (2004), and Wynn-Williams, K., Whiting, R.H. and Adler, A. (2008) in this journal are to be welcomed. They both present evidence of their use of business case studies (BCS) in an intermediate-level accounting course in a New Zealand university, measuring students' learning styles before and after the BCS intervention. Both studies fail to report any statistically significant changes in learning styles on two of those years, and reports that learning styles have a bearing upon performance. The papers present an interesting and topical account of the use of BCS in an accounting course over an extended period. However, in our view their applied use of learning styles and the Learning Styles Inventory II (LSI-1985) in this context is methodologically questionable. This comment indicates how future research might build on their exploratory work. Issues of concern include the literature base, the psychometric properties of scores produced by the LSI-1985, and analysis and disclosure of results.

KW - learning styles

KW - approaches to learning

KW - LSI-1985

KW - psychometric measurement

U2 - 10.1080/09639280701788729

DO - 10.1080/09639280701788729

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 129

JO - Accounting Education

JF - Accounting Education

SN - 0963-9284

IS - 2

ER -