Abstract
This article will explore Michel Foucault’s ideas with respect to the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19), focusing on biopolitics and the influence of the surveillance state. The impact of extended and extensive lockdowns on the mental health of Scottish residents is scrutinized from a Foucauldian perspective. A key limitation of using Foucault’s framework for analysing the pandemic must be recognized. While Foucault’s perspective focuses on control mechanisms, it might lead to viewing all public health measures with suspicion. For example, the UK’s vaccination campaign was said to have prevented approximately 100,000 deaths, demonstrating that biopower can be beneficial, not solely oppressive. The framework is most useful not as a comprehensive critique but to challenge uncomfortable assumptions about who wields power, whose lives are valued, and how consent is created. In this way, it remains a vital perspective for understanding not only COVID-19, but also the broader dynamics between governance, bodies, and society.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-8 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | International Journal of Mental Health Research |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Publication status | Published - 19 Jul 2026 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Keywords
- anomie
- biopolitics
- covid-19
- Foucault
- lockdowns
- mental health
- Scotland
- surveillance
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of extended COVID-19 lockdowns on Scottish residents’ mental health'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver