Abstract
Issues of environmental justice regarding housing, health, and other public services have been subjected to critical scrutiny in Scotland for some time. However, such concerns have not focused on Gypsy/Traveller communities and their accommodation on local authority and private sites. Politically, the Scottish National Party (SNP) and the Scottish Greens have been in favour of providing and funding site/pitch upgrades, including developing new site locations. These suggestions have been controversial, and reactions have been debated, not least by local councillors and the media. Drawing on the work of Kristeva (1982) and Tyler (2013), this paper argues that one explanation for understanding responses to Gypsy/Traveller sites is via the concept of (social) abjection. When examining local contexts, spatial locations, and the environmental circumstances of local authority sites, much work is still to be done in challenging instances of environmental and health injustice and anti-Gypsy/Traveller prejudice in Scotland.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 938-950 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Social Policy and Society |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 16 Feb 2024 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 31 Oct 2024 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Keywords
- abjection
- accomodation
- environmental justice
- gypsy/travellers
- Scotland
- traveller sites
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Green Agenda: why the provision and development of Gypsy/Traveller sites in Scotland is a health hazard as much as an accommodation priority''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver