The Glasgow Norms: ratings of 5,500 words on nine scales

Graham G. Scott, Anne Keitel, Marc Becirspahic, Bo Yao, Sara C. Sereno

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The Glasgow Norms are a set of normative ratings for 5,553 English words on nine psycholinguistic dimensions: arousal, valence, dominance, concreteness, imageability, familiarity, age of acquisition, semantic size, and gender association. The Glasgow Norms are unique in several respects. First, the corpus itself is relatively large, while simultaneously providing norms across a substantial number of lexical dimensions. Second, for any given subset of words, the same participants provided ratings across all nine dimensions (33 participants/word, on average). Third, two novel dimensions-semantic size and gender association-are included. Finally, the corpus contains a set of 379 ambiguous words that are presented either alone (e.g., toast) or with information that selects an alternative sense (e.g., toast (bread), toast (speech)). The relationships between the dimensions of the Glasgow Norms were initially investigated by assessing their correlations. In addition, a principal component analysis revealed four main factors, accounting for 82% of the variance (Visualization, Emotion, Salience, and Exposure). The validity of the Glasgow Norms was established via comparisons of our ratings to 18 different sets of current psycholinguistic norms. The dimension of size was tested with megastudy data, confirming findings from past studies that have explicitly examined this variable. Alternative senses of ambiguous words (i.e., disambiguated forms), when discordant on a given dimension, seemingly led to appropriately distinct ratings. Informal comparisons between the ratings of ambiguous words and of their alternative senses showed different patterns that likely depended on several factors (the number of senses, their relative strengths, and the rating scales themselves). Overall, the Glasgow Norms provide a valuable resource-in particular, for researchers investigating the role of word recognition in language comprehension.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1258-1270
Number of pages13
JournalBehavior Research Methods
Volume51
Issue number3
Early online date11 Sep 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Jun 2019

Fingerprint

Psycholinguistics
Semantics
Bread
Principal Component Analysis
Arousal
Emotions
Language
Research Personnel
Recognition (Psychology)
Glasgow
Rating

Keywords

  • psycholinguistic norms
  • arousal
  • Valence
  • dominance
  • concreteness
  • imageability
  • familiarity
  • age of acquisition
  • semantic size
  • gender association

Cite this

Scott, Graham G. ; Keitel, Anne ; Becirspahic, Marc ; Yao, Bo ; Sereno, Sara C. / The Glasgow Norms : ratings of 5,500 words on nine scales. In: Behavior Research Methods. 2019 ; Vol. 51, No. 3. pp. 1258-1270.
@article{9bb4cdf71b3146b6a229df6b1d319bd3,
title = "The Glasgow Norms: ratings of 5,500 words on nine scales",
abstract = "The Glasgow Norms are a set of normative ratings for 5,553 English words on nine psycholinguistic dimensions: arousal, valence, dominance, concreteness, imageability, familiarity, age of acquisition, semantic size, and gender association. The Glasgow Norms are unique in several respects. First, the corpus itself is relatively large, while simultaneously providing norms across a substantial number of lexical dimensions. Second, for any given subset of words, the same participants provided ratings across all nine dimensions (33 participants/word, on average). Third, two novel dimensions-semantic size and gender association-are included. Finally, the corpus contains a set of 379 ambiguous words that are presented either alone (e.g., toast) or with information that selects an alternative sense (e.g., toast (bread), toast (speech)). The relationships between the dimensions of the Glasgow Norms were initially investigated by assessing their correlations. In addition, a principal component analysis revealed four main factors, accounting for 82{\%} of the variance (Visualization, Emotion, Salience, and Exposure). The validity of the Glasgow Norms was established via comparisons of our ratings to 18 different sets of current psycholinguistic norms. The dimension of size was tested with megastudy data, confirming findings from past studies that have explicitly examined this variable. Alternative senses of ambiguous words (i.e., disambiguated forms), when discordant on a given dimension, seemingly led to appropriately distinct ratings. Informal comparisons between the ratings of ambiguous words and of their alternative senses showed different patterns that likely depended on several factors (the number of senses, their relative strengths, and the rating scales themselves). Overall, the Glasgow Norms provide a valuable resource-in particular, for researchers investigating the role of word recognition in language comprehension.",
keywords = "psycholinguistic norms, arousal, Valence, dominance, concreteness, imageability, familiarity, age of acquisition, semantic size, gender association",
author = "Scott, {Graham G.} and Anne Keitel and Marc Becirspahic and Bo Yao and Sereno, {Sara C.}",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "30",
doi = "10.3758/s13428-018-1099-3",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "1258--1270",
journal = "Behavior Research Methods",
issn = "1554-3528",
publisher = "Springer Nature",
number = "3",

}

Scott, GG, Keitel, A, Becirspahic, M, Yao, B & Sereno, SC 2019, 'The Glasgow Norms: ratings of 5,500 words on nine scales' Behavior Research Methods, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 1258-1270. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1099-3

The Glasgow Norms : ratings of 5,500 words on nine scales. / Scott, Graham G.; Keitel, Anne; Becirspahic, Marc; Yao, Bo; Sereno, Sara C.

In: Behavior Research Methods, Vol. 51, No. 3, 30.06.2019, p. 1258-1270.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Glasgow Norms

T2 - ratings of 5,500 words on nine scales

AU - Scott, Graham G.

AU - Keitel, Anne

AU - Becirspahic, Marc

AU - Yao, Bo

AU - Sereno, Sara C.

PY - 2019/6/30

Y1 - 2019/6/30

N2 - The Glasgow Norms are a set of normative ratings for 5,553 English words on nine psycholinguistic dimensions: arousal, valence, dominance, concreteness, imageability, familiarity, age of acquisition, semantic size, and gender association. The Glasgow Norms are unique in several respects. First, the corpus itself is relatively large, while simultaneously providing norms across a substantial number of lexical dimensions. Second, for any given subset of words, the same participants provided ratings across all nine dimensions (33 participants/word, on average). Third, two novel dimensions-semantic size and gender association-are included. Finally, the corpus contains a set of 379 ambiguous words that are presented either alone (e.g., toast) or with information that selects an alternative sense (e.g., toast (bread), toast (speech)). The relationships between the dimensions of the Glasgow Norms were initially investigated by assessing their correlations. In addition, a principal component analysis revealed four main factors, accounting for 82% of the variance (Visualization, Emotion, Salience, and Exposure). The validity of the Glasgow Norms was established via comparisons of our ratings to 18 different sets of current psycholinguistic norms. The dimension of size was tested with megastudy data, confirming findings from past studies that have explicitly examined this variable. Alternative senses of ambiguous words (i.e., disambiguated forms), when discordant on a given dimension, seemingly led to appropriately distinct ratings. Informal comparisons between the ratings of ambiguous words and of their alternative senses showed different patterns that likely depended on several factors (the number of senses, their relative strengths, and the rating scales themselves). Overall, the Glasgow Norms provide a valuable resource-in particular, for researchers investigating the role of word recognition in language comprehension.

AB - The Glasgow Norms are a set of normative ratings for 5,553 English words on nine psycholinguistic dimensions: arousal, valence, dominance, concreteness, imageability, familiarity, age of acquisition, semantic size, and gender association. The Glasgow Norms are unique in several respects. First, the corpus itself is relatively large, while simultaneously providing norms across a substantial number of lexical dimensions. Second, for any given subset of words, the same participants provided ratings across all nine dimensions (33 participants/word, on average). Third, two novel dimensions-semantic size and gender association-are included. Finally, the corpus contains a set of 379 ambiguous words that are presented either alone (e.g., toast) or with information that selects an alternative sense (e.g., toast (bread), toast (speech)). The relationships between the dimensions of the Glasgow Norms were initially investigated by assessing their correlations. In addition, a principal component analysis revealed four main factors, accounting for 82% of the variance (Visualization, Emotion, Salience, and Exposure). The validity of the Glasgow Norms was established via comparisons of our ratings to 18 different sets of current psycholinguistic norms. The dimension of size was tested with megastudy data, confirming findings from past studies that have explicitly examined this variable. Alternative senses of ambiguous words (i.e., disambiguated forms), when discordant on a given dimension, seemingly led to appropriately distinct ratings. Informal comparisons between the ratings of ambiguous words and of their alternative senses showed different patterns that likely depended on several factors (the number of senses, their relative strengths, and the rating scales themselves). Overall, the Glasgow Norms provide a valuable resource-in particular, for researchers investigating the role of word recognition in language comprehension.

KW - psycholinguistic norms

KW - arousal

KW - Valence

KW - dominance

KW - concreteness

KW - imageability

KW - familiarity

KW - age of acquisition

KW - semantic size

KW - gender association

U2 - 10.3758/s13428-018-1099-3

DO - 10.3758/s13428-018-1099-3

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 1258

EP - 1270

JO - Behavior Research Methods

JF - Behavior Research Methods

SN - 1554-3528

IS - 3

ER -