The fall and rise of experiential construction and engineering education: decoupling and recoupling practice and theory

Alan Forster, Nick Pilcher, Stuart Tennant, Mike Murray, Nigel Craig, Alex Copping

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)
145 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

From the mid-20th C., construction and engineering pedagogy and curricula have moved from long-held traditional experiential apprenticeship approaches to one ostensibly decoupling practice and theory. This paper traces this decoupling and explores modern-day opportunities and challenges for recoupling university education with industry practice. Within this context the UK Government funds Graduate Level Apprenticeships (GLA) and introduces the Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF), arguably signalling a desire to recouple. Nevertheless, many challenges from following previous UK Government policy prioritising research remain, particularly for post-1992 institutions. Arguably, Higher Education Institutions (HEI’s) are at a pedagogical crossroads, considering whether to choose REF-ville, TEF-ville, and/or Apprentice Township. Do HEI’s continue their increasingly decontextualized theoretical approach, or re-embrace construction and engineering education’s experiential roots? We present and discuss opportunities and challenges currently facing HEI’s, aiming to help inform decisions regarding recoupling theory and practice in construction and engineering teaching and learning, but potentially also other fields.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)79-100
JournalHigher Education Pedagogies
Volume2
Early online date12 Jul 2017
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 12 Jul 2017

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The fall and rise of experiential construction and engineering education: decoupling and recoupling practice and theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this