The fall and rise of experiential construction and engineering education: decoupling and recoupling practice and theory

Alan Forster, Nick Pilcher, Stuart Tennant, MIke Murray, Nigel Craig, Alex Copping

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

From the mid-20th C., construction and engineering pedagogy and curricula have moved from long-held traditional experiential apprenticeship approaches to one ostensibly decoupling practice and theory. This paper traces this decoupling and explores modern-day opportunities and challenges for recoupling university education with industry practice. Within this context the UK Government funds Graduate Level Apprenticeships (GLA) and introduces the Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF), arguably signalling a desire to recouple. Nevertheless, many challenges from following previous UK Government policy prioritising research remain, particularly for post-1992 institutions. Arguably, Higher Education Institutions (HEI’s) are at a pedagogical crossroads, considering whether to choose REF-ville, TEF-ville, and/or Apprentice Township. Do HEI’s continue their increasingly decontextualized theoretical approach, or re-embrace construction and engineering education’s experiential roots? We present and discuss opportunities and challenges currently facing HEI’s, aiming to help inform decisions regarding recoupling theory and practice in construction and engineering teaching and learning, but potentially also other fields.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)79-100
JournalHigher Education Pedagogies
Volume2
Early online date12 Jul 2017
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 12 Jul 2017

Fingerprint

engineering
apprenticeship
education
Teaching
experiential education
apprentice
university education
government policy
reconstruction
graduate
curriculum
industry
learning

Cite this

Forster, Alan ; Pilcher, Nick ; Tennant, Stuart ; Murray, MIke ; Craig, Nigel ; Copping, Alex. / The fall and rise of experiential construction and engineering education : decoupling and recoupling practice and theory. In: Higher Education Pedagogies . 2017 ; Vol. 2. pp. 79-100.
@article{e18502d7f99f4ef480eb0430835c7dc3,
title = "The fall and rise of experiential construction and engineering education: decoupling and recoupling practice and theory",
abstract = "From the mid-20th C., construction and engineering pedagogy and curricula have moved from long-held traditional experiential apprenticeship approaches to one ostensibly decoupling practice and theory. This paper traces this decoupling and explores modern-day opportunities and challenges for recoupling university education with industry practice. Within this context the UK Government funds Graduate Level Apprenticeships (GLA) and introduces the Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF), arguably signalling a desire to recouple. Nevertheless, many challenges from following previous UK Government policy prioritising research remain, particularly for post-1992 institutions. Arguably, Higher Education Institutions (HEI’s) are at a pedagogical crossroads, considering whether to choose REF-ville, TEF-ville, and/or Apprentice Township. Do HEI’s continue their increasingly decontextualized theoretical approach, or re-embrace construction and engineering education’s experiential roots? We present and discuss opportunities and challenges currently facing HEI’s, aiming to help inform decisions regarding recoupling theory and practice in construction and engineering teaching and learning, but potentially also other fields.",
author = "Alan Forster and Nick Pilcher and Stuart Tennant and MIke Murray and Nigel Craig and Alex Copping",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1080/23752696.2017.1338530",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "79--100",
journal = "Higher Education Pedagogies",
issn = "2375-2696",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

}

The fall and rise of experiential construction and engineering education : decoupling and recoupling practice and theory. / Forster, Alan; Pilcher, Nick; Tennant, Stuart; Murray, MIke; Craig, Nigel; Copping, Alex.

In: Higher Education Pedagogies , Vol. 2, 12.07.2017, p. 79-100.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The fall and rise of experiential construction and engineering education

T2 - decoupling and recoupling practice and theory

AU - Forster, Alan

AU - Pilcher, Nick

AU - Tennant, Stuart

AU - Murray, MIke

AU - Craig, Nigel

AU - Copping, Alex

PY - 2017/7/12

Y1 - 2017/7/12

N2 - From the mid-20th C., construction and engineering pedagogy and curricula have moved from long-held traditional experiential apprenticeship approaches to one ostensibly decoupling practice and theory. This paper traces this decoupling and explores modern-day opportunities and challenges for recoupling university education with industry practice. Within this context the UK Government funds Graduate Level Apprenticeships (GLA) and introduces the Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF), arguably signalling a desire to recouple. Nevertheless, many challenges from following previous UK Government policy prioritising research remain, particularly for post-1992 institutions. Arguably, Higher Education Institutions (HEI’s) are at a pedagogical crossroads, considering whether to choose REF-ville, TEF-ville, and/or Apprentice Township. Do HEI’s continue their increasingly decontextualized theoretical approach, or re-embrace construction and engineering education’s experiential roots? We present and discuss opportunities and challenges currently facing HEI’s, aiming to help inform decisions regarding recoupling theory and practice in construction and engineering teaching and learning, but potentially also other fields.

AB - From the mid-20th C., construction and engineering pedagogy and curricula have moved from long-held traditional experiential apprenticeship approaches to one ostensibly decoupling practice and theory. This paper traces this decoupling and explores modern-day opportunities and challenges for recoupling university education with industry practice. Within this context the UK Government funds Graduate Level Apprenticeships (GLA) and introduces the Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF), arguably signalling a desire to recouple. Nevertheless, many challenges from following previous UK Government policy prioritising research remain, particularly for post-1992 institutions. Arguably, Higher Education Institutions (HEI’s) are at a pedagogical crossroads, considering whether to choose REF-ville, TEF-ville, and/or Apprentice Township. Do HEI’s continue their increasingly decontextualized theoretical approach, or re-embrace construction and engineering education’s experiential roots? We present and discuss opportunities and challenges currently facing HEI’s, aiming to help inform decisions regarding recoupling theory and practice in construction and engineering teaching and learning, but potentially also other fields.

U2 - 10.1080/23752696.2017.1338530

DO - 10.1080/23752696.2017.1338530

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 79

EP - 100

JO - Higher Education Pedagogies

JF - Higher Education Pedagogies

SN - 2375-2696

ER -