The “Fairness Paradox” and “Small-Firm Growth Resistance Strategies”

Farid Ullah, Robert Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to examine and explore why “Small-Businesses” resist employing outside the immediate family and investigate the employee as an outsider and entrepreneurial resource.

Design/methodology/approach
– The authors review the literature on barriers to small-business growth concentrating on key empirical and theoretical studies. The authors use empirical data from the Federation of Small Business in which informants commented on growth and employing outside the family.

Findings
– The findings suggest that small business owners adopt a polemical stance, arguing that a barrage of employment regulations deters them from employing outsiders because doing so brings trouble in terms of costs such as insurance, taxes, paperwork, leave (maternity and paternity) entitlement, etc. They argue that employing from inside the family or ones peer group is much cheaper, convenient and less hassle. This ignores the entrepreneurial employee as a potential ingredient of growth and points to a paradox whereby the very values and emotions characterized by fairness of which of “smallness” and “familialness” is composed compound the issues of discrimination central to the debate.

Research limitations/implications
– The paper offer important insights for growth issues among small businesses and challenge the contemporary equilibrium in terms of small “family-orientated” business philosophy relating to employment practices. Ideologically, the entrepreneur is an “outsider” fighting the establishment, yet paradoxically, in a small-business context s/he becomes the establishment by employing outsiders. This results in the fairness vs unfairness paradox.

Originality/value
– The paper contributes to the existing knowledge and understanding on growth issues among small businesses by illuminating a paradoxical insider vs outsider tension.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)154-175
Number of pages22
JournalWorld Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Fairness
Small business
Paradox
Firm growth
Small firms
Outsider
Employees
Insider-outsider
Resources
Entitlement
Peer group
Maternity leave
Employment regulation
Family business
Business growth
Entrepreneurs
Employment practices
Owners
Empirical data
Costs

Keywords

  • business
  • entrepreneurship

Cite this

@article{bdb0caabbb474c3990b9794f8b476435,
title = "The “Fairness Paradox” and “Small-Firm Growth Resistance Strategies”",
abstract = "Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to examine and explore why “Small-Businesses” resist employing outside the immediate family and investigate the employee as an outsider and entrepreneurial resource.Design/methodology/approach– The authors review the literature on barriers to small-business growth concentrating on key empirical and theoretical studies. The authors use empirical data from the Federation of Small Business in which informants commented on growth and employing outside the family.Findings– The findings suggest that small business owners adopt a polemical stance, arguing that a barrage of employment regulations deters them from employing outsiders because doing so brings trouble in terms of costs such as insurance, taxes, paperwork, leave (maternity and paternity) entitlement, etc. They argue that employing from inside the family or ones peer group is much cheaper, convenient and less hassle. This ignores the entrepreneurial employee as a potential ingredient of growth and points to a paradox whereby the very values and emotions characterized by fairness of which of “smallness” and “familialness” is composed compound the issues of discrimination central to the debate.Research limitations/implications– The paper offer important insights for growth issues among small businesses and challenge the contemporary equilibrium in terms of small “family-orientated” business philosophy relating to employment practices. Ideologically, the entrepreneur is an “outsider” fighting the establishment, yet paradoxically, in a small-business context s/he becomes the establishment by employing outsiders. This results in the fairness vs unfairness paradox.Originality/value– The paper contributes to the existing knowledge and understanding on growth issues among small businesses by illuminating a paradoxical insider vs outsider tension.",
keywords = "business, entrepreneurship",
author = "Farid Ullah and Robert Smith",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1108/WJEMSD-02-2015-0005",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "154--175",
journal = "World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development",
issn = "2042-5961",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
number = "3",

}

The “Fairness Paradox” and “Small-Firm Growth Resistance Strategies”. / Ullah, Farid; Smith, Robert.

In: World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2015, p. 154-175.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The “Fairness Paradox” and “Small-Firm Growth Resistance Strategies”

AU - Ullah, Farid

AU - Smith, Robert

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to examine and explore why “Small-Businesses” resist employing outside the immediate family and investigate the employee as an outsider and entrepreneurial resource.Design/methodology/approach– The authors review the literature on barriers to small-business growth concentrating on key empirical and theoretical studies. The authors use empirical data from the Federation of Small Business in which informants commented on growth and employing outside the family.Findings– The findings suggest that small business owners adopt a polemical stance, arguing that a barrage of employment regulations deters them from employing outsiders because doing so brings trouble in terms of costs such as insurance, taxes, paperwork, leave (maternity and paternity) entitlement, etc. They argue that employing from inside the family or ones peer group is much cheaper, convenient and less hassle. This ignores the entrepreneurial employee as a potential ingredient of growth and points to a paradox whereby the very values and emotions characterized by fairness of which of “smallness” and “familialness” is composed compound the issues of discrimination central to the debate.Research limitations/implications– The paper offer important insights for growth issues among small businesses and challenge the contemporary equilibrium in terms of small “family-orientated” business philosophy relating to employment practices. Ideologically, the entrepreneur is an “outsider” fighting the establishment, yet paradoxically, in a small-business context s/he becomes the establishment by employing outsiders. This results in the fairness vs unfairness paradox.Originality/value– The paper contributes to the existing knowledge and understanding on growth issues among small businesses by illuminating a paradoxical insider vs outsider tension.

AB - Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to examine and explore why “Small-Businesses” resist employing outside the immediate family and investigate the employee as an outsider and entrepreneurial resource.Design/methodology/approach– The authors review the literature on barriers to small-business growth concentrating on key empirical and theoretical studies. The authors use empirical data from the Federation of Small Business in which informants commented on growth and employing outside the family.Findings– The findings suggest that small business owners adopt a polemical stance, arguing that a barrage of employment regulations deters them from employing outsiders because doing so brings trouble in terms of costs such as insurance, taxes, paperwork, leave (maternity and paternity) entitlement, etc. They argue that employing from inside the family or ones peer group is much cheaper, convenient and less hassle. This ignores the entrepreneurial employee as a potential ingredient of growth and points to a paradox whereby the very values and emotions characterized by fairness of which of “smallness” and “familialness” is composed compound the issues of discrimination central to the debate.Research limitations/implications– The paper offer important insights for growth issues among small businesses and challenge the contemporary equilibrium in terms of small “family-orientated” business philosophy relating to employment practices. Ideologically, the entrepreneur is an “outsider” fighting the establishment, yet paradoxically, in a small-business context s/he becomes the establishment by employing outsiders. This results in the fairness vs unfairness paradox.Originality/value– The paper contributes to the existing knowledge and understanding on growth issues among small businesses by illuminating a paradoxical insider vs outsider tension.

KW - business

KW - entrepreneurship

U2 - 10.1108/WJEMSD-02-2015-0005

DO - 10.1108/WJEMSD-02-2015-0005

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 154

EP - 175

JO - World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development

JF - World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development

SN - 2042-5961

IS - 3

ER -