The evaluation of an inexpensive, 2D, video based gait assessment system for clinical use

U. Chris Ugbolue, Enrica Papi, Konstantinos T. Kaliarntas, Andrew Kerr, Leo Earl, Valerie M. Pomeroy, Philip J. Rowe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical potential of an augmented-video-based-portable-system (AVPS). The AVPS included a walkway grid mat made of vinyl flooring, flat paper bull's eye markers, four photoswitches mounted on tripods, a light-indicator, a video camera, and a computer with ProTrainer System software. The AVPS output was compared to a "gold standard" 3D Vicon Motion Analysis System both statically and dynamically over a fixed range (-90 degrees to +90 degrees) using a two-segment-goniometric-rig marked with both bull's eye and retroreflective markers. At each segment angle position, three trials of data were captured. The reliability of the AVPS was also tested using three raters. Further twelve, young, healthy subjects participated in a concurrent validity study in which they performed six gait trials which were simultaneously recorded by both systems. Both motion analysis systems showed low levels of intra subject variability in all kinematic variables indicated by the size of the standard deviations across the six trials. There were no significant differences between the motion systems with respect to the kinematic variables (P > 0.05). The results showed a high intra- and inter-rater reliability for both the kinematic and temporo-spatial parameters. With respect to gait events the lowest ICC value for the intra-rater reliability test was 0.993 for the kinematic variables, and ranged from 0.941 to 0.956 for the temporo-spatial variables and 0.731 to 0.954 for the tibia inclination angles. The validation data suggest the AVPS is capable of generating highly reliable and repeatable data when applied to normal subjects and could be used within the clinical setting.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)483-489
JournalGait & Posture
Volume38
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2013

Keywords

  • Gait
  • Bull's eye marker
  • Validity
  • Reliability
  • Video
  • Motion analysis

Cite this

Ugbolue, U. C., Papi, E., Kaliarntas, K. T., Kerr, A., Earl, L., Pomeroy, V. M., & Rowe, P. J. (2013). The evaluation of an inexpensive, 2D, video based gait assessment system for clinical use. Gait & Posture, 38(3), 483-489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.01.018
Ugbolue, U. Chris ; Papi, Enrica ; Kaliarntas, Konstantinos T. ; Kerr, Andrew ; Earl, Leo ; Pomeroy, Valerie M. ; Rowe, Philip J. / The evaluation of an inexpensive, 2D, video based gait assessment system for clinical use. In: Gait & Posture. 2013 ; Vol. 38, No. 3. pp. 483-489.
@article{bffb553a53fc4138ae1a932af398de30,
title = "The evaluation of an inexpensive, 2D, video based gait assessment system for clinical use",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical potential of an augmented-video-based-portable-system (AVPS). The AVPS included a walkway grid mat made of vinyl flooring, flat paper bull's eye markers, four photoswitches mounted on tripods, a light-indicator, a video camera, and a computer with ProTrainer System software. The AVPS output was compared to a {"}gold standard{"} 3D Vicon Motion Analysis System both statically and dynamically over a fixed range (-90 degrees to +90 degrees) using a two-segment-goniometric-rig marked with both bull's eye and retroreflective markers. At each segment angle position, three trials of data were captured. The reliability of the AVPS was also tested using three raters. Further twelve, young, healthy subjects participated in a concurrent validity study in which they performed six gait trials which were simultaneously recorded by both systems. Both motion analysis systems showed low levels of intra subject variability in all kinematic variables indicated by the size of the standard deviations across the six trials. There were no significant differences between the motion systems with respect to the kinematic variables (P > 0.05). The results showed a high intra- and inter-rater reliability for both the kinematic and temporo-spatial parameters. With respect to gait events the lowest ICC value for the intra-rater reliability test was 0.993 for the kinematic variables, and ranged from 0.941 to 0.956 for the temporo-spatial variables and 0.731 to 0.954 for the tibia inclination angles. The validation data suggest the AVPS is capable of generating highly reliable and repeatable data when applied to normal subjects and could be used within the clinical setting.",
keywords = "Gait, Bull's eye marker, Validity, Reliability, Video, Motion analysis",
author = "Ugbolue, {U. Chris} and Enrica Papi and Kaliarntas, {Konstantinos T.} and Andrew Kerr and Leo Earl and Pomeroy, {Valerie M.} and Rowe, {Philip J.}",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.01.018",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "483--489",
journal = "Gait & Posture",
issn = "0966-6362",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",
number = "3",

}

Ugbolue, UC, Papi, E, Kaliarntas, KT, Kerr, A, Earl, L, Pomeroy, VM & Rowe, PJ 2013, 'The evaluation of an inexpensive, 2D, video based gait assessment system for clinical use' Gait & Posture, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 483-489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.01.018

The evaluation of an inexpensive, 2D, video based gait assessment system for clinical use. / Ugbolue, U. Chris; Papi, Enrica; Kaliarntas, Konstantinos T.; Kerr, Andrew; Earl, Leo; Pomeroy, Valerie M.; Rowe, Philip J.

In: Gait & Posture, Vol. 38, No. 3, 07.2013, p. 483-489.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The evaluation of an inexpensive, 2D, video based gait assessment system for clinical use

AU - Ugbolue, U. Chris

AU - Papi, Enrica

AU - Kaliarntas, Konstantinos T.

AU - Kerr, Andrew

AU - Earl, Leo

AU - Pomeroy, Valerie M.

AU - Rowe, Philip J.

PY - 2013/7

Y1 - 2013/7

N2 - The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical potential of an augmented-video-based-portable-system (AVPS). The AVPS included a walkway grid mat made of vinyl flooring, flat paper bull's eye markers, four photoswitches mounted on tripods, a light-indicator, a video camera, and a computer with ProTrainer System software. The AVPS output was compared to a "gold standard" 3D Vicon Motion Analysis System both statically and dynamically over a fixed range (-90 degrees to +90 degrees) using a two-segment-goniometric-rig marked with both bull's eye and retroreflective markers. At each segment angle position, three trials of data were captured. The reliability of the AVPS was also tested using three raters. Further twelve, young, healthy subjects participated in a concurrent validity study in which they performed six gait trials which were simultaneously recorded by both systems. Both motion analysis systems showed low levels of intra subject variability in all kinematic variables indicated by the size of the standard deviations across the six trials. There were no significant differences between the motion systems with respect to the kinematic variables (P > 0.05). The results showed a high intra- and inter-rater reliability for both the kinematic and temporo-spatial parameters. With respect to gait events the lowest ICC value for the intra-rater reliability test was 0.993 for the kinematic variables, and ranged from 0.941 to 0.956 for the temporo-spatial variables and 0.731 to 0.954 for the tibia inclination angles. The validation data suggest the AVPS is capable of generating highly reliable and repeatable data when applied to normal subjects and could be used within the clinical setting.

AB - The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical potential of an augmented-video-based-portable-system (AVPS). The AVPS included a walkway grid mat made of vinyl flooring, flat paper bull's eye markers, four photoswitches mounted on tripods, a light-indicator, a video camera, and a computer with ProTrainer System software. The AVPS output was compared to a "gold standard" 3D Vicon Motion Analysis System both statically and dynamically over a fixed range (-90 degrees to +90 degrees) using a two-segment-goniometric-rig marked with both bull's eye and retroreflective markers. At each segment angle position, three trials of data were captured. The reliability of the AVPS was also tested using three raters. Further twelve, young, healthy subjects participated in a concurrent validity study in which they performed six gait trials which were simultaneously recorded by both systems. Both motion analysis systems showed low levels of intra subject variability in all kinematic variables indicated by the size of the standard deviations across the six trials. There were no significant differences between the motion systems with respect to the kinematic variables (P > 0.05). The results showed a high intra- and inter-rater reliability for both the kinematic and temporo-spatial parameters. With respect to gait events the lowest ICC value for the intra-rater reliability test was 0.993 for the kinematic variables, and ranged from 0.941 to 0.956 for the temporo-spatial variables and 0.731 to 0.954 for the tibia inclination angles. The validation data suggest the AVPS is capable of generating highly reliable and repeatable data when applied to normal subjects and could be used within the clinical setting.

KW - Gait

KW - Bull's eye marker

KW - Validity

KW - Reliability

KW - Video

KW - Motion analysis

U2 - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.01.018

DO - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.01.018

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 483

EP - 489

JO - Gait & Posture

JF - Gait & Posture

SN - 0966-6362

IS - 3

ER -