Abstract
Objectives
This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of co-created lifestyle interventions in modifying health behaviour, and mental/physical health outcomes in individuals with non-communicable diseases (NCDs).
Study Design
A systematic review of Randomized Control Trials (RCTs).
Methods
A systematic search of nine databases from inception until March 2023 was performed, plus weekly email alerts of new literature until March 2025. Studies comparing co-created lifestyle interventions with any control were included. Meta-analysis using the random effects model was conducted. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane-RoB-2, and quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE system.
Results
Sixteen RCTs (2201 participants; 74.2% female; mean 53.8 years) were included. Meta-analysis showed that at <6 months, there is moderate quality evidence that co-created lifestyle interventions significantly improve health behaviour (moderate effect; SMD=0.49, 95%CI: 0.33-0.65) and physical health (small effect; SMD=0.21, 95%CI: 0.09-0.34), and mental health (small effect; SMD=0.29, 95%CI: 0.14-0.43), in individuals with NCDs. At ≥6 months, there is moderate quality evidence that co-created interventions improve health behaviour (small effect; SMD=0.21, 95%CI: 0.07-0.35), and mental health (small effect; SMD=0.19, 95%CI: 0.12-0.26). A small effect with low quality evidence (SMD=0.11, 95%CI: -0.09-0.32) was also observed for physical health, however, it was not statistically significant.
Conclusions
There is moderate quality evidence that co-created lifestyle interventions for secondary prevention of NCDs have a significant positive impact on the target health behaviour, and on mental health, and physical health outcomes.
This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of co-created lifestyle interventions in modifying health behaviour, and mental/physical health outcomes in individuals with non-communicable diseases (NCDs).
Study Design
A systematic review of Randomized Control Trials (RCTs).
Methods
A systematic search of nine databases from inception until March 2023 was performed, plus weekly email alerts of new literature until March 2025. Studies comparing co-created lifestyle interventions with any control were included. Meta-analysis using the random effects model was conducted. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane-RoB-2, and quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE system.
Results
Sixteen RCTs (2201 participants; 74.2% female; mean 53.8 years) were included. Meta-analysis showed that at <6 months, there is moderate quality evidence that co-created lifestyle interventions significantly improve health behaviour (moderate effect; SMD=0.49, 95%CI: 0.33-0.65) and physical health (small effect; SMD=0.21, 95%CI: 0.09-0.34), and mental health (small effect; SMD=0.29, 95%CI: 0.14-0.43), in individuals with NCDs. At ≥6 months, there is moderate quality evidence that co-created interventions improve health behaviour (small effect; SMD=0.21, 95%CI: 0.07-0.35), and mental health (small effect; SMD=0.19, 95%CI: 0.12-0.26). A small effect with low quality evidence (SMD=0.11, 95%CI: -0.09-0.32) was also observed for physical health, however, it was not statistically significant.
Conclusions
There is moderate quality evidence that co-created lifestyle interventions for secondary prevention of NCDs have a significant positive impact on the target health behaviour, and on mental health, and physical health outcomes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 105929 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Public Health |
| Volume | 248 |
| Early online date | 21 Aug 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 21 Aug 2025 |
Keywords
- co-creation
- NCDs
- health behaviour
- mental health
- physical health
- systematic review
