The effect of responsibility attitude and stimulus valence on recognition and confidence in recognition

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

Perceived responsibility has significant cognitive consequences for both clinical and nonclinical groups (Moritz, Wahl, Zurowski, Jelinek, Hand and Fricke, 2007). Under conditions of perceived responsibility, individuals show a positive memory (Radomsky, Rachman and Hammond 2000), but also a decline in metamemory for salient stimuli (Moritz, Wahl, Zurowski, Jelinek, Hand, and Fricke, 2007). Stimulus salience enhances retrieval by means of directive attention (Nothdurft, 2002) but may actually impede metamemory, particularly among anxious populations. It has been suggested that for OCD patients and nonclinical participants with OCD symptoms, progressive exposure to emotionally salient stimuli worsens confidence in memory, while having no effect in memory accuracy (Tolin, Abramowitz, Brigidi, Amir, Street, & Foa, 2001). Perceived responsibility is associated with a positive memory bias for negative stimuli (Radomsky, Gilchrist & Dussault, 2004, and Dek, van den Hout, Giele & Engelhard, 2009) with reduced memory confidence (Boschen & Vuksanovic, 2007). The current study investigated the possible association in a healthy population, between responsibility, measured by the Responsibility Attitude Scale (RAS) (Salkovskis, Wroe, Gledhill, Morrison, Forrester, Richards, Reynolds &Thorpe, 2000), recognition and confidence in recognition of words that varied in valence. 85 healthy participants were administered the RAS prior to taking part in a word recognition task. Results indicated that responsibility attitude did not predict memory accuracy or memory confidence for negatively, positively or neutrally valenced words. Furthermore, word valence had no effect on memory confidence but did have a significant effect on memory accuracy. Implications for future research point towards the utilisation of responsibility-relevant stimuli.
Original languageEnglish
Pages54-54
Number of pages1
Publication statusPublished - 2014
EventBPS Cognitive Psychology Section Annual Conference 2014 - Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom
Duration: 3 Sep 20145 Sep 2014
https://www1.bps.org.uk/networks-and-communities/member-microsite/cognitive-psychology-section/2014 (Conference website)

Conference

ConferenceBPS Cognitive Psychology Section Annual Conference 2014
CountryUnited Kingdom
CityNottingham
Period3/09/145/09/14
Internet address

Fingerprint

Hand
Recognition (Psychology)
Population
Healthy Volunteers
Metacognition

Cite this

Manoussaki, K. (2014). The effect of responsibility attitude and stimulus valence on recognition and confidence in recognition. 54-54. Paper presented at BPS Cognitive Psychology Section Annual Conference 2014, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Manoussaki, Kallia. / The effect of responsibility attitude and stimulus valence on recognition and confidence in recognition. Paper presented at BPS Cognitive Psychology Section Annual Conference 2014, Nottingham, United Kingdom.1 p.
@conference{b8d135fdf38148188474a912d9b63531,
title = "The effect of responsibility attitude and stimulus valence on recognition and confidence in recognition",
abstract = "Perceived responsibility has significant cognitive consequences for both clinical and nonclinical groups (Moritz, Wahl, Zurowski, Jelinek, Hand and Fricke, 2007). Under conditions of perceived responsibility, individuals show a positive memory (Radomsky, Rachman and Hammond 2000), but also a decline in metamemory for salient stimuli (Moritz, Wahl, Zurowski, Jelinek, Hand, and Fricke, 2007). Stimulus salience enhances retrieval by means of directive attention (Nothdurft, 2002) but may actually impede metamemory, particularly among anxious populations. It has been suggested that for OCD patients and nonclinical participants with OCD symptoms, progressive exposure to emotionally salient stimuli worsens confidence in memory, while having no effect in memory accuracy (Tolin, Abramowitz, Brigidi, Amir, Street, & Foa, 2001). Perceived responsibility is associated with a positive memory bias for negative stimuli (Radomsky, Gilchrist & Dussault, 2004, and Dek, van den Hout, Giele & Engelhard, 2009) with reduced memory confidence (Boschen & Vuksanovic, 2007). The current study investigated the possible association in a healthy population, between responsibility, measured by the Responsibility Attitude Scale (RAS) (Salkovskis, Wroe, Gledhill, Morrison, Forrester, Richards, Reynolds &Thorpe, 2000), recognition and confidence in recognition of words that varied in valence. 85 healthy participants were administered the RAS prior to taking part in a word recognition task. Results indicated that responsibility attitude did not predict memory accuracy or memory confidence for negatively, positively or neutrally valenced words. Furthermore, word valence had no effect on memory confidence but did have a significant effect on memory accuracy. Implications for future research point towards the utilisation of responsibility-relevant stimuli.",
author = "Kallia Manoussaki",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
pages = "54--54",
note = "BPS Cognitive Psychology Section Annual Conference 2014 ; Conference date: 03-09-2014 Through 05-09-2014",
url = "https://www1.bps.org.uk/networks-and-communities/member-microsite/cognitive-psychology-section/2014",

}

Manoussaki, K 2014, 'The effect of responsibility attitude and stimulus valence on recognition and confidence in recognition' Paper presented at BPS Cognitive Psychology Section Annual Conference 2014, Nottingham, United Kingdom, 3/09/14 - 5/09/14, pp. 54-54.

The effect of responsibility attitude and stimulus valence on recognition and confidence in recognition. / Manoussaki, Kallia.

2014. 54-54 Paper presented at BPS Cognitive Psychology Section Annual Conference 2014, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

TY - CONF

T1 - The effect of responsibility attitude and stimulus valence on recognition and confidence in recognition

AU - Manoussaki, Kallia

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Perceived responsibility has significant cognitive consequences for both clinical and nonclinical groups (Moritz, Wahl, Zurowski, Jelinek, Hand and Fricke, 2007). Under conditions of perceived responsibility, individuals show a positive memory (Radomsky, Rachman and Hammond 2000), but also a decline in metamemory for salient stimuli (Moritz, Wahl, Zurowski, Jelinek, Hand, and Fricke, 2007). Stimulus salience enhances retrieval by means of directive attention (Nothdurft, 2002) but may actually impede metamemory, particularly among anxious populations. It has been suggested that for OCD patients and nonclinical participants with OCD symptoms, progressive exposure to emotionally salient stimuli worsens confidence in memory, while having no effect in memory accuracy (Tolin, Abramowitz, Brigidi, Amir, Street, & Foa, 2001). Perceived responsibility is associated with a positive memory bias for negative stimuli (Radomsky, Gilchrist & Dussault, 2004, and Dek, van den Hout, Giele & Engelhard, 2009) with reduced memory confidence (Boschen & Vuksanovic, 2007). The current study investigated the possible association in a healthy population, between responsibility, measured by the Responsibility Attitude Scale (RAS) (Salkovskis, Wroe, Gledhill, Morrison, Forrester, Richards, Reynolds &Thorpe, 2000), recognition and confidence in recognition of words that varied in valence. 85 healthy participants were administered the RAS prior to taking part in a word recognition task. Results indicated that responsibility attitude did not predict memory accuracy or memory confidence for negatively, positively or neutrally valenced words. Furthermore, word valence had no effect on memory confidence but did have a significant effect on memory accuracy. Implications for future research point towards the utilisation of responsibility-relevant stimuli.

AB - Perceived responsibility has significant cognitive consequences for both clinical and nonclinical groups (Moritz, Wahl, Zurowski, Jelinek, Hand and Fricke, 2007). Under conditions of perceived responsibility, individuals show a positive memory (Radomsky, Rachman and Hammond 2000), but also a decline in metamemory for salient stimuli (Moritz, Wahl, Zurowski, Jelinek, Hand, and Fricke, 2007). Stimulus salience enhances retrieval by means of directive attention (Nothdurft, 2002) but may actually impede metamemory, particularly among anxious populations. It has been suggested that for OCD patients and nonclinical participants with OCD symptoms, progressive exposure to emotionally salient stimuli worsens confidence in memory, while having no effect in memory accuracy (Tolin, Abramowitz, Brigidi, Amir, Street, & Foa, 2001). Perceived responsibility is associated with a positive memory bias for negative stimuli (Radomsky, Gilchrist & Dussault, 2004, and Dek, van den Hout, Giele & Engelhard, 2009) with reduced memory confidence (Boschen & Vuksanovic, 2007). The current study investigated the possible association in a healthy population, between responsibility, measured by the Responsibility Attitude Scale (RAS) (Salkovskis, Wroe, Gledhill, Morrison, Forrester, Richards, Reynolds &Thorpe, 2000), recognition and confidence in recognition of words that varied in valence. 85 healthy participants were administered the RAS prior to taking part in a word recognition task. Results indicated that responsibility attitude did not predict memory accuracy or memory confidence for negatively, positively or neutrally valenced words. Furthermore, word valence had no effect on memory confidence but did have a significant effect on memory accuracy. Implications for future research point towards the utilisation of responsibility-relevant stimuli.

M3 - Paper

SP - 54

EP - 54

ER -

Manoussaki K. The effect of responsibility attitude and stimulus valence on recognition and confidence in recognition. 2014. Paper presented at BPS Cognitive Psychology Section Annual Conference 2014, Nottingham, United Kingdom.