The dorso-ventro debate: in search of empirical evidence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Identification of safe injections sites is a skill practised routinely by nurses, which, as with all nursing practice, is informed by empirical evidence. Despite this, discussion as to whether the dorsogluteal site should be eradicated from nursing practice in favour of the ventrogluteal site shows no sign of abating. Review of commonly cited evidence in this debate aimed to identify the validity of excluding the dorsogluteal site in favour of the ventrogluteal site by investigating the empirical evidence, which routinely informs this decision. Empirical evidence suggests a case to exclude the dorsogluteal site for children under age 10 for fear of damaging the sciatic nerve, but not so for adults. Recommendations are made for conclusive research into the viability of the dorsogluteal site and an authoritative decision based on empirical evidence, not hearsay, with regard to its continuance or eradication from nursing practice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1132-1139
Number of pages8
JournalBritish Journal of Nursing
Volume24
Issue number22
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 12 Dec 2015

Keywords

  • Dorsogluteal site
  • Intramuscular injections
  • Sciatic nerve
  • Ventrogluteal site

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The dorso-ventro debate: in search of empirical evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this