Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The discrimination of quick Paediatric Early Warning Scores in the pre-hospital setting

  • A.R. Corfield
  • , L. Clerihew
  • , E. Stewart
  • , H. Staines
  • , D. Tough
  • , K.D. Rooney*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    86 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    In our previous study, a Paediatric Early Warning Score could be calculated for only one-fifth of 102,993 children transported by ambulance to hospital, as components other than supplemental oxygen were not reliably measured: respiratory rate 90,358 (88%); Glasgow Coma Score 83,648 (81%); heart rate 83,330 (81%); time to capillary reperfusion 81,685 (79%); oxygen saturation 71,372 (69%); temperature 60,402 (59%); systolic blood pressure 37,088 (36%). We tested 12 abbreviated scores with 3–5 components. The discrimination of these 12 scores for the primary outcome (30-day mortality or admission to paediatric intensive care), as measured by the area under the receiving operator characteristic curve, ranged from 0.69 to 0.80. Scores could be calculated for at most 74,508 (72%) children when heart rate, conscious level and respiratory rate were measured, with or without supplemental oxygen: the discrimination of these two versions was 0.75 and 0.77, respectively. Optimal threshold scores of 3 and 2 for these two abbreviated versions discriminated an outcome rate of 2–3% in about one third of children from the other children who had < 1% rate of outcome.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)353-358
    Number of pages6
    JournalAnaesthesia
    Volume75
    Issue number3
    Early online date12 Dec 2019
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2020

    Keywords

    • Child Health
    • Critical Illness
    • Early warning scores
    • Patient safety
    • Pre-hospital
    • Resource limited

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The discrimination of quick Paediatric Early Warning Scores in the pre-hospital setting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this