The commercial currency of construction framework agreements

Stuart Tennant, Scott Fernie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A critique is presented of construction client-main contractor framework agreements. In the midst of an unpredictable and volatile construction environment, the commercial currency of collaborative working practice, and by extension framework agreements, is being put under increasing management scrutiny. Drawing on a literature review, the guiding principles of framework agreements are examined. A dramatic downturn in construction demand has created considerable surplus in supply. Under such conditions the buyer-supplier interdependencies become imbalanced and commercial relationships fraught. Reports by construction industry analysts demonstrate a number of private sector clients rejecting framework agreements in favour of traditional competitive procurement practices. Drawing upon a neoclassical lens, three guiding principles embedded within economic orthodoxy are employed to examine business-to-business tensions within construction framework agreements, namely, individualism, instrumentalism and equilibrium. This neoclassical interpretation of construction framework agreements reveals a potential relational management bias within mainstream rhetoric. Notably, providing a complementary account of framework agreements practice should not be construed as a rejection of collaborative working practices. An alternative account of framework agreements is presented that does not rely upon the mainstream behavioural model of contemporary contracting.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)209-220
JournalBuilding Research & Information
Volume40
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Keywords

  • collaboration
  • construction industry
  • framework agreement
  • procurement

Cite this

@article{cfc76abc7e774ec98b886608e787f88c,
title = "The commercial currency of construction framework agreements",
abstract = "A critique is presented of construction client-main contractor framework agreements. In the midst of an unpredictable and volatile construction environment, the commercial currency of collaborative working practice, and by extension framework agreements, is being put under increasing management scrutiny. Drawing on a literature review, the guiding principles of framework agreements are examined. A dramatic downturn in construction demand has created considerable surplus in supply. Under such conditions the buyer-supplier interdependencies become imbalanced and commercial relationships fraught. Reports by construction industry analysts demonstrate a number of private sector clients rejecting framework agreements in favour of traditional competitive procurement practices. Drawing upon a neoclassical lens, three guiding principles embedded within economic orthodoxy are employed to examine business-to-business tensions within construction framework agreements, namely, individualism, instrumentalism and equilibrium. This neoclassical interpretation of construction framework agreements reveals a potential relational management bias within mainstream rhetoric. Notably, providing a complementary account of framework agreements practice should not be construed as a rejection of collaborative working practices. An alternative account of framework agreements is presented that does not rely upon the mainstream behavioural model of contemporary contracting.",
keywords = "collaboration, construction industry, framework agreement, procurement",
author = "Stuart Tennant and Scott Fernie",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1080/09613218.2012.655072",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "209--220",
journal = "Building Research & Information",
issn = "0961-3218",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

The commercial currency of construction framework agreements. / Tennant, Stuart; Fernie, Scott.

In: Building Research & Information, Vol. 40, No. 2, 2012, p. 209-220.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The commercial currency of construction framework agreements

AU - Tennant, Stuart

AU - Fernie, Scott

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - A critique is presented of construction client-main contractor framework agreements. In the midst of an unpredictable and volatile construction environment, the commercial currency of collaborative working practice, and by extension framework agreements, is being put under increasing management scrutiny. Drawing on a literature review, the guiding principles of framework agreements are examined. A dramatic downturn in construction demand has created considerable surplus in supply. Under such conditions the buyer-supplier interdependencies become imbalanced and commercial relationships fraught. Reports by construction industry analysts demonstrate a number of private sector clients rejecting framework agreements in favour of traditional competitive procurement practices. Drawing upon a neoclassical lens, three guiding principles embedded within economic orthodoxy are employed to examine business-to-business tensions within construction framework agreements, namely, individualism, instrumentalism and equilibrium. This neoclassical interpretation of construction framework agreements reveals a potential relational management bias within mainstream rhetoric. Notably, providing a complementary account of framework agreements practice should not be construed as a rejection of collaborative working practices. An alternative account of framework agreements is presented that does not rely upon the mainstream behavioural model of contemporary contracting.

AB - A critique is presented of construction client-main contractor framework agreements. In the midst of an unpredictable and volatile construction environment, the commercial currency of collaborative working practice, and by extension framework agreements, is being put under increasing management scrutiny. Drawing on a literature review, the guiding principles of framework agreements are examined. A dramatic downturn in construction demand has created considerable surplus in supply. Under such conditions the buyer-supplier interdependencies become imbalanced and commercial relationships fraught. Reports by construction industry analysts demonstrate a number of private sector clients rejecting framework agreements in favour of traditional competitive procurement practices. Drawing upon a neoclassical lens, three guiding principles embedded within economic orthodoxy are employed to examine business-to-business tensions within construction framework agreements, namely, individualism, instrumentalism and equilibrium. This neoclassical interpretation of construction framework agreements reveals a potential relational management bias within mainstream rhetoric. Notably, providing a complementary account of framework agreements practice should not be construed as a rejection of collaborative working practices. An alternative account of framework agreements is presented that does not rely upon the mainstream behavioural model of contemporary contracting.

KW - collaboration

KW - construction industry

KW - framework agreement

KW - procurement

U2 - 10.1080/09613218.2012.655072

DO - 10.1080/09613218.2012.655072

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 209

EP - 220

JO - Building Research & Information

JF - Building Research & Information

SN - 0961-3218

IS - 2

ER -