Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The benefits and limitations of anonymous, electronic, cross-campus marking

    Research output: Contribution to conferenceOtherpeer-review

    Abstract

    Background:
    The University of the West of Scotland (UWS) is Scotland’s largest modern university with the largest School of Health. There are approximately 4100 full or part time students studying at one of four campus sites across the West of
    Scotland. Pre-registration adult and mental health programmes of study (BSc Adult Nursing or BSc Mental Health Nursing) run simultaneously on each of the four campuses. Internal drivers from within the School heralded the move to electronic management of written assessments.

    Aim:
    This presentation shall explore our experience of using Turnitin to assess and provide students with feedback for a 2nd year module on the BSc Adult Nursing programme.

    Discussion:
    Anonymous, cross-campus marking with initiated for students who submitted their 2500 word context dependent assignment in August 2012. The module moderator highlighted that this approach demonstrated consistency of marking across all four sites and that the use of Turnitin had improved student feedback. However, those students who had been unsuccessful raised some concerns about the ease of accessing academic support to help them prepare for their
    next attempt. Although the quality of feedback had improved, students were keen to have face-to-face discussions with the marker to enable them to
    improve their work. As a result, it was decided to return to campus specific marking but still used Turnitin.

    Conclusions:
    The move to Turnitin to facilitate electronic marking and feedback of student
    assessments has been challenging but ultimately worthwhile. Although the decision to cease cross-campus marking was taken, Turnitin allows students to submit their work without having to come onto campus to deliver paper copies. It allows lecturers to mark from home, eases the processes of moderation and external examiner review and enhances the student experience by providing a range of feedback methods (comments within the text, general comments and electronic rubrics).
    Original languageEnglish
    Number of pages25
    Publication statusPublished - 26 Feb 2014
    EventRCN Education Forum conference and exhibition: partners in practice - The Majestic Hotel, Harrogate, United Kingdom
    Duration: 26 Feb 201427 Feb 2014

    Conference

    ConferenceRCN Education Forum conference and exhibition
    Country/TerritoryUnited Kingdom
    CityHarrogate
    Period26/02/1427/02/14

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The benefits and limitations of anonymous, electronic, cross-campus marking'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this