Temporality and alteration of social boundaries in the making of an art installation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article addresses a set of contemporary art practices situated within a dialogical paradigm, also referred to as relational aesthetics, and discusses its potential for resistance against market-dominant art production and rather contentious creative industries discourse, particularly in relation to creative labour. These nuanced artistic treatments within a dialogic aesthetics frame, particularly those born out of an experience of ‘displacement’, alter the formation of subjectivity in multiple ways, including the processes of becoming as well as the paradigms of knowledge exchange, associated with artistic practice and research. The question is: how can artists resist a dominant system of art production today? Haunted by this question, I discuss some of the promises as well as threats that unpredictability and dis/placement hold for contemporary visual arts and social change.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)53-69
Number of pages17
JournalCreative Industries Journal
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

art production
aesthetics
art
paradigm
cultural economy
contemporary art
artist
subjectivity
social change
Personnel
threat
labor
discourse
market
knowledge
Industry
experience
Art Installation
Social Boundaries
Temporality

Cite this

@article{8deba5150c5942938753812e251eee13,
title = "Temporality and alteration of social boundaries in the making of an art installation",
abstract = "This article addresses a set of contemporary art practices situated within a dialogical paradigm, also referred to as relational aesthetics, and discusses its potential for resistance against market-dominant art production and rather contentious creative industries discourse, particularly in relation to creative labour. These nuanced artistic treatments within a dialogic aesthetics frame, particularly those born out of an experience of ‘displacement’, alter the formation of subjectivity in multiple ways, including the processes of becoming as well as the paradigms of knowledge exchange, associated with artistic practice and research. The question is: how can artists resist a dominant system of art production today? Haunted by this question, I discuss some of the promises as well as threats that unpredictability and dis/placement hold for contemporary visual arts and social change.",
author = "Katarzyna Kosmala",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1386/cij.4.1.531",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "53--69",
journal = "Creative Industries Journal",
issn = "1751-0694",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Temporality and alteration of social boundaries in the making of an art installation. / Kosmala, Katarzyna.

In: Creative Industries Journal, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2011, p. 53-69.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Temporality and alteration of social boundaries in the making of an art installation

AU - Kosmala, Katarzyna

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - This article addresses a set of contemporary art practices situated within a dialogical paradigm, also referred to as relational aesthetics, and discusses its potential for resistance against market-dominant art production and rather contentious creative industries discourse, particularly in relation to creative labour. These nuanced artistic treatments within a dialogic aesthetics frame, particularly those born out of an experience of ‘displacement’, alter the formation of subjectivity in multiple ways, including the processes of becoming as well as the paradigms of knowledge exchange, associated with artistic practice and research. The question is: how can artists resist a dominant system of art production today? Haunted by this question, I discuss some of the promises as well as threats that unpredictability and dis/placement hold for contemporary visual arts and social change.

AB - This article addresses a set of contemporary art practices situated within a dialogical paradigm, also referred to as relational aesthetics, and discusses its potential for resistance against market-dominant art production and rather contentious creative industries discourse, particularly in relation to creative labour. These nuanced artistic treatments within a dialogic aesthetics frame, particularly those born out of an experience of ‘displacement’, alter the formation of subjectivity in multiple ways, including the processes of becoming as well as the paradigms of knowledge exchange, associated with artistic practice and research. The question is: how can artists resist a dominant system of art production today? Haunted by this question, I discuss some of the promises as well as threats that unpredictability and dis/placement hold for contemporary visual arts and social change.

U2 - 10.1386/cij.4.1.531

DO - 10.1386/cij.4.1.531

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 53

EP - 69

JO - Creative Industries Journal

JF - Creative Industries Journal

SN - 1751-0694

IS - 1

ER -