Abstract
This chapter considers the case for and against including service user voices in supervision. The case for excluding service users’ voice in supervision focuses upon professional concerns about how supervision would change if service user voices were included in supervision, and the practical problems of how to include service user voices in supervision. The case for including the service users’ voice focuses upon the benefits of doing so i.e., service user involvement would generate evidence of the impact from supervision and social work practice on service user outcomes, and inform system improvements. Drawing from the research evidence, this chapter critically explores these positions, giving examples of key developments in research and practice settings that are addressing this issue.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | The Routledge International Handbook of Social Work Supervision |
| Editors | Kieran O'Donoghue, Lambert Engelbrecht |
| Publisher | Routledge |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780367250867 |
| Publication status | Published - 29 Jun 2021 |
Publication series
| Name | Routledge International Handbooks |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Routledge |
Keywords
- supervision
- social work
- service users
- voice
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Supervision and service users’ voice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Research output
- 1 Commissioned report
-
Practice Enquiry Into Supervision in a Variety of Adult Care Settings Where There Are Health and Social Care Practitioners Working Together
Lambley, S. & Marrable, T., 31 May 2013, London: Social Care Institute for Excellence. 44 p.Research output: Book/Report › Commissioned report
Open Access
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver