Students' views of group-based work and the issue of peer assessment

Edward Edgerton, Jim McKechnie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper evaluates the introduction of a ‘new’ form of assessment in a final year psychology
undergraduate module. The assessment required students to work in groups (N = 3 or 4) to
produce a conference-style poster that presented personality data collated from the whole class.
The final grade for each student on this assessment reflected a group mark for the poster, a peer
assessment mark from their group and their individual performance on a question and answer
session on the poster. The evaluation focussed on (i) students perception of this piece of
assessment, (ii) the relationship between different elements of this assessment and the module
exam, and (iii) issues surrounding reciprocity in group work. The main findings suggested that
generally students found the poster comparable to other forms of assessment they had
experienced in terms of difficulty and effort required, and that on the whole they were positive
about the assessment despite misgivings about group organisation and dynamics. In addition,
the assessed elements of the poster did not correlate with performance on the exam, suggesting
that they may relate to different skills. Finally, the results suggested that the measurement of
reciprocity in peer assessment may be more complex where small groups are concerned.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)76-81
JournalPsychology Learning & Teaching
Publication statusPublished - 19 Jun 2002

Fingerprint

Posters
poster
Students
Group
student
Personality
group work
reciprocity
small group
performance
personality
evaluation

Cite this

@article{a18f74b817054f6c8a5aedc700275832,
title = "Students' views of group-based work and the issue of peer assessment",
abstract = "This paper evaluates the introduction of a ‘new’ form of assessment in a final year psychologyundergraduate module. The assessment required students to work in groups (N = 3 or 4) toproduce a conference-style poster that presented personality data collated from the whole class.The final grade for each student on this assessment reflected a group mark for the poster, a peerassessment mark from their group and their individual performance on a question and answersession on the poster. The evaluation focussed on (i) students perception of this piece ofassessment, (ii) the relationship between different elements of this assessment and the moduleexam, and (iii) issues surrounding reciprocity in group work. The main findings suggested thatgenerally students found the poster comparable to other forms of assessment they hadexperienced in terms of difficulty and effort required, and that on the whole they were positiveabout the assessment despite misgivings about group organisation and dynamics. In addition,the assessed elements of the poster did not correlate with performance on the exam, suggestingthat they may relate to different skills. Finally, the results suggested that the measurement ofreciprocity in peer assessment may be more complex where small groups are concerned.",
author = "Edward Edgerton and Jim McKechnie",
year = "2002",
month = "6",
day = "19",
language = "English",
pages = "76--81",
journal = "Psychology Learning & Teaching",
issn = "1475-7257",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",

}

Students' views of group-based work and the issue of peer assessment. / Edgerton, Edward; McKechnie, Jim.

In: Psychology Learning & Teaching, 19.06.2002, p. 76-81.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Students' views of group-based work and the issue of peer assessment

AU - Edgerton, Edward

AU - McKechnie, Jim

PY - 2002/6/19

Y1 - 2002/6/19

N2 - This paper evaluates the introduction of a ‘new’ form of assessment in a final year psychologyundergraduate module. The assessment required students to work in groups (N = 3 or 4) toproduce a conference-style poster that presented personality data collated from the whole class.The final grade for each student on this assessment reflected a group mark for the poster, a peerassessment mark from their group and their individual performance on a question and answersession on the poster. The evaluation focussed on (i) students perception of this piece ofassessment, (ii) the relationship between different elements of this assessment and the moduleexam, and (iii) issues surrounding reciprocity in group work. The main findings suggested thatgenerally students found the poster comparable to other forms of assessment they hadexperienced in terms of difficulty and effort required, and that on the whole they were positiveabout the assessment despite misgivings about group organisation and dynamics. In addition,the assessed elements of the poster did not correlate with performance on the exam, suggestingthat they may relate to different skills. Finally, the results suggested that the measurement ofreciprocity in peer assessment may be more complex where small groups are concerned.

AB - This paper evaluates the introduction of a ‘new’ form of assessment in a final year psychologyundergraduate module. The assessment required students to work in groups (N = 3 or 4) toproduce a conference-style poster that presented personality data collated from the whole class.The final grade for each student on this assessment reflected a group mark for the poster, a peerassessment mark from their group and their individual performance on a question and answersession on the poster. The evaluation focussed on (i) students perception of this piece ofassessment, (ii) the relationship between different elements of this assessment and the moduleexam, and (iii) issues surrounding reciprocity in group work. The main findings suggested thatgenerally students found the poster comparable to other forms of assessment they hadexperienced in terms of difficulty and effort required, and that on the whole they were positiveabout the assessment despite misgivings about group organisation and dynamics. In addition,the assessed elements of the poster did not correlate with performance on the exam, suggestingthat they may relate to different skills. Finally, the results suggested that the measurement ofreciprocity in peer assessment may be more complex where small groups are concerned.

M3 - Article

SP - 76

EP - 81

JO - Psychology Learning & Teaching

JF - Psychology Learning & Teaching

SN - 1475-7257

ER -