Structuring action and reflection in information systems action research studies using checkland's FMA model

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Authors of interpretive information systems (IS) work are claiming more frequently to be drawing upon action research as a means of undertaking IS research. The literature, while containing many useful discussions about the fundamental concepts of action research and case studies reporting its use, has little to offer the IS researcher in terms of practical guidance about conducting an action research study. The intention in this paper is to draw upon personal experiences to offer some practical guidance and warnings for the would-be IS action researcher. To do this we use Checkland’s description of research (what we refer to as the FMA model) as a way of helping us to consider the action research process of our own formal IS studies and to report our experiences and lessons. We attempt to set out these experiences and lessons in a way that is consistent with an action research study.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)251-281
Number of pages31
JournalSystemic Practice and Action Research
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2001

Fingerprint

Information systems
Guidance

Keywords

  • Information systems research, interpretive IS work, action research, Checkland's FMA model of research
  • Interpretive IS work
  • Action research
  • Checkland's FMA model of research

Cite this

@article{a34243bae078427e964f724a2ba92672,
title = "Structuring action and reflection in information systems action research studies using checkland's FMA model",
abstract = "Authors of interpretive information systems (IS) work are claiming more frequently to be drawing upon action research as a means of undertaking IS research. The literature, while containing many useful discussions about the fundamental concepts of action research and case studies reporting its use, has little to offer the IS researcher in terms of practical guidance about conducting an action research study. The intention in this paper is to draw upon personal experiences to offer some practical guidance and warnings for the would-be IS action researcher. To do this we use Checkland’s description of research (what we refer to as the FMA model) as a way of helping us to consider the action research process of our own formal IS studies and to report our experiences and lessons. We attempt to set out these experiences and lessons in a way that is consistent with an action research study.",
keywords = "Information systems research, interpretive IS work, action research, Checkland's FMA model of research, Interpretive IS work, Action research , Checkland's FMA model of research",
author = "Daune West and Mark Stansfield",
year = "2001",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1023/A:1011355214452",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "251--281",
journal = "Systemic Practice and Action Research",
issn = "1094-429X",
publisher = "Springer Nature",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Structuring action and reflection in information systems action research studies using checkland's FMA model

AU - West, Daune

AU - Stansfield, Mark

PY - 2001/6/1

Y1 - 2001/6/1

N2 - Authors of interpretive information systems (IS) work are claiming more frequently to be drawing upon action research as a means of undertaking IS research. The literature, while containing many useful discussions about the fundamental concepts of action research and case studies reporting its use, has little to offer the IS researcher in terms of practical guidance about conducting an action research study. The intention in this paper is to draw upon personal experiences to offer some practical guidance and warnings for the would-be IS action researcher. To do this we use Checkland’s description of research (what we refer to as the FMA model) as a way of helping us to consider the action research process of our own formal IS studies and to report our experiences and lessons. We attempt to set out these experiences and lessons in a way that is consistent with an action research study.

AB - Authors of interpretive information systems (IS) work are claiming more frequently to be drawing upon action research as a means of undertaking IS research. The literature, while containing many useful discussions about the fundamental concepts of action research and case studies reporting its use, has little to offer the IS researcher in terms of practical guidance about conducting an action research study. The intention in this paper is to draw upon personal experiences to offer some practical guidance and warnings for the would-be IS action researcher. To do this we use Checkland’s description of research (what we refer to as the FMA model) as a way of helping us to consider the action research process of our own formal IS studies and to report our experiences and lessons. We attempt to set out these experiences and lessons in a way that is consistent with an action research study.

KW - Information systems research, interpretive IS work, action research, Checkland's FMA model of research

KW - Interpretive IS work

KW - Action research

KW - Checkland's FMA model of research

U2 - 10.1023/A:1011355214452

DO - 10.1023/A:1011355214452

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 251

EP - 281

JO - Systemic Practice and Action Research

JF - Systemic Practice and Action Research

SN - 1094-429X

IS - 3

ER -