Stakeholder citizenship: the complexities of Polish migrants’ citizenship attachments in the context of the Scottish independence referendum

Emilia Pietka-Nykaza, Derek McGhee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article focuses on the experiences of Scotland’s largest foreign-born minority group, namely Poles, in the run-up to the Scottish independence referendum in 2014. We draw on 20 in-depth interviews to explore our participants’ intentions and justifications for voting (or not) in the referendum. We found that our participants tended to emphasise the jus domicili principle when justifying their eligibility to vote in the referendum. However, our participants extended the jus domicili principle in their justifications to also include the intention to stay in Scotland as a central aspect of their continuing stake in (and right to vote in the referendum to determine) Scotland’s future. Through exploring our participants’ justifications for voting in the referendum, we were able to examine and better understand how migrants constitute their citizenship through articulating their substantive attachments (social, economic and relational or familial) in their adoptive country and in their country of origin.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)115-129
Number of pages15
JournalCitizenship Studies
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

referendum
citizenship
stakeholder
migrant
eligibility to vote
voting
right to vote
minority group
country of origin
Pole
social economics
minority
interview
economics
experience
Group

Cite this

@article{7ed460a58aa34b709512cccfb60ee7f1,
title = "Stakeholder citizenship: the complexities of Polish migrants’ citizenship attachments in the context of the Scottish independence referendum",
abstract = "This article focuses on the experiences of Scotland’s largest foreign-born minority group, namely Poles, in the run-up to the Scottish independence referendum in 2014. We draw on 20 in-depth interviews to explore our participants’ intentions and justifications for voting (or not) in the referendum. We found that our participants tended to emphasise the jus domicili principle when justifying their eligibility to vote in the referendum. However, our participants extended the jus domicili principle in their justifications to also include the intention to stay in Scotland as a central aspect of their continuing stake in (and right to vote in the referendum to determine) Scotland’s future. Through exploring our participants’ justifications for voting in the referendum, we were able to examine and better understand how migrants constitute their citizenship through articulating their substantive attachments (social, economic and relational or familial) in their adoptive country and in their country of origin.",
author = "Emilia Pietka-Nykaza and Derek McGhee",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/13621025.2015.1054789",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "115--129",
journal = "Citizenship Studies",
issn = "1362-1025",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stakeholder citizenship

T2 - the complexities of Polish migrants’ citizenship attachments in the context of the Scottish independence referendum

AU - Pietka-Nykaza, Emilia

AU - McGhee, Derek

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This article focuses on the experiences of Scotland’s largest foreign-born minority group, namely Poles, in the run-up to the Scottish independence referendum in 2014. We draw on 20 in-depth interviews to explore our participants’ intentions and justifications for voting (or not) in the referendum. We found that our participants tended to emphasise the jus domicili principle when justifying their eligibility to vote in the referendum. However, our participants extended the jus domicili principle in their justifications to also include the intention to stay in Scotland as a central aspect of their continuing stake in (and right to vote in the referendum to determine) Scotland’s future. Through exploring our participants’ justifications for voting in the referendum, we were able to examine and better understand how migrants constitute their citizenship through articulating their substantive attachments (social, economic and relational or familial) in their adoptive country and in their country of origin.

AB - This article focuses on the experiences of Scotland’s largest foreign-born minority group, namely Poles, in the run-up to the Scottish independence referendum in 2014. We draw on 20 in-depth interviews to explore our participants’ intentions and justifications for voting (or not) in the referendum. We found that our participants tended to emphasise the jus domicili principle when justifying their eligibility to vote in the referendum. However, our participants extended the jus domicili principle in their justifications to also include the intention to stay in Scotland as a central aspect of their continuing stake in (and right to vote in the referendum to determine) Scotland’s future. Through exploring our participants’ justifications for voting in the referendum, we were able to examine and better understand how migrants constitute their citizenship through articulating their substantive attachments (social, economic and relational or familial) in their adoptive country and in their country of origin.

U2 - 10.1080/13621025.2015.1054789

DO - 10.1080/13621025.2015.1054789

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 115

EP - 129

JO - Citizenship Studies

JF - Citizenship Studies

SN - 1362-1025

IS - 1

ER -