Socialism and democratic strategy in Italy’s Biennio Rosso: Gramsci contra Treves

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article examines the divisions in Italian Socialism between Revolutionaries and Reformists against the backdrop of the Biennio Rosso (1919-20), taking the writings of Antonio Gramsci and Claudio Treves respectively as characteristic of the two traditions. The central focus is on their opposing accounts of how the Socialist movement should organize the masses to achieve its objectives – referred to here as its ‘democratic strategy.’ I demonstrate how the key strategic elements of Gramsci’s and Treves’s positions developed in a dialogue centered on the place violence, (il)legality, soviets, parliaments and compromise should play in effectively mobilizing the masses for Socialism. The article concludes by arguing that in retrospect Treves’s Reformism has been a more successful approach, and Gramsci himself conceded something to it in his prison writings. However, I also maintain that the popular character of Gramsci’s radical democratic strategy - first fashioned in the Biennio Rosso - can still contribute to debates on Socialism and Social Democracy today.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)314-337
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Modern Italian Studies
Volume22
Issue number3
Early online date21 Jun 2017
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 21 Jun 2017

Fingerprint

socialism
socialist movement
reformism
social democracy
legality
parliament
compromise
correctional institution
dialogue
violence
Antonio Gramsci
Socialism

Keywords

  • Antonio Gramsci, Claudio Treves, Socialism, democracy, political strategy, Biennio Rosso

Cite this

@article{e4fc2274f3094e3fb7d026f00655828a,
title = "Socialism and democratic strategy in Italy’s Biennio Rosso: Gramsci contra Treves",
abstract = "This article examines the divisions in Italian Socialism between Revolutionaries and Reformists against the backdrop of the Biennio Rosso (1919-20), taking the writings of Antonio Gramsci and Claudio Treves respectively as characteristic of the two traditions. The central focus is on their opposing accounts of how the Socialist movement should organize the masses to achieve its objectives – referred to here as its ‘democratic strategy.’ I demonstrate how the key strategic elements of Gramsci’s and Treves’s positions developed in a dialogue centered on the place violence, (il)legality, soviets, parliaments and compromise should play in effectively mobilizing the masses for Socialism. The article concludes by arguing that in retrospect Treves’s Reformism has been a more successful approach, and Gramsci himself conceded something to it in his prison writings. However, I also maintain that the popular character of Gramsci’s radical democratic strategy - first fashioned in the Biennio Rosso - can still contribute to debates on Socialism and Social Democracy today.",
keywords = "Antonio Gramsci, Claudio Treves, Socialism, democracy, political strategy, Biennio Rosso",
author = "Mark McNally",
note = "18 months embargo",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1080/1354571X.2017.1321932",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "314--337",
journal = "Journal of Modern Italian Studies",
issn = "1354-571X",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "3",

}

Socialism and democratic strategy in Italy’s Biennio Rosso : Gramsci contra Treves. / McNally, Mark.

In: Journal of Modern Italian Studies, Vol. 22, No. 3, 21.06.2017, p. 314-337.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Socialism and democratic strategy in Italy’s Biennio Rosso

T2 - Gramsci contra Treves

AU - McNally, Mark

N1 - 18 months embargo

PY - 2017/6/21

Y1 - 2017/6/21

N2 - This article examines the divisions in Italian Socialism between Revolutionaries and Reformists against the backdrop of the Biennio Rosso (1919-20), taking the writings of Antonio Gramsci and Claudio Treves respectively as characteristic of the two traditions. The central focus is on their opposing accounts of how the Socialist movement should organize the masses to achieve its objectives – referred to here as its ‘democratic strategy.’ I demonstrate how the key strategic elements of Gramsci’s and Treves’s positions developed in a dialogue centered on the place violence, (il)legality, soviets, parliaments and compromise should play in effectively mobilizing the masses for Socialism. The article concludes by arguing that in retrospect Treves’s Reformism has been a more successful approach, and Gramsci himself conceded something to it in his prison writings. However, I also maintain that the popular character of Gramsci’s radical democratic strategy - first fashioned in the Biennio Rosso - can still contribute to debates on Socialism and Social Democracy today.

AB - This article examines the divisions in Italian Socialism between Revolutionaries and Reformists against the backdrop of the Biennio Rosso (1919-20), taking the writings of Antonio Gramsci and Claudio Treves respectively as characteristic of the two traditions. The central focus is on their opposing accounts of how the Socialist movement should organize the masses to achieve its objectives – referred to here as its ‘democratic strategy.’ I demonstrate how the key strategic elements of Gramsci’s and Treves’s positions developed in a dialogue centered on the place violence, (il)legality, soviets, parliaments and compromise should play in effectively mobilizing the masses for Socialism. The article concludes by arguing that in retrospect Treves’s Reformism has been a more successful approach, and Gramsci himself conceded something to it in his prison writings. However, I also maintain that the popular character of Gramsci’s radical democratic strategy - first fashioned in the Biennio Rosso - can still contribute to debates on Socialism and Social Democracy today.

KW - Antonio Gramsci, Claudio Treves, Socialism, democracy, political strategy, Biennio Rosso

U2 - 10.1080/1354571X.2017.1321932

DO - 10.1080/1354571X.2017.1321932

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 314

EP - 337

JO - Journal of Modern Italian Studies

JF - Journal of Modern Italian Studies

SN - 1354-571X

IS - 3

ER -