Social factors for data sparsity problem of trust models in MANETs

Antesar M. Shabut, Keshav Dahal

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
169 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The use of recommendation in trust-based models has its advantages in enhancing the correctness and quality of the rating provided by mobile and autonomous nodes in MANETs. However, building a trust model with a recommender system in dynamic and distributed networks is a challenging problem due to the risk of dishonest recommendations. Dealing with dishonest recommendations can result in the additional problem of data sparsity, which is related to the availability of information in the early rounds of the network time or when nodes are inactive in providing recommendations. This paper investigates the problems of data sparsity and cold start of recommender systems in existing trust models. It proposes a recommender system with clustering technique to dynamically seek similar recommendations based on a certain timeframe. Similarity between different nodes is evaluated based on important attributes includes use of interactions, compatibility of information and closeness between the mobile nodes. The recommender system is empirically tested and empirical analysis demonstrates robustness in alleviating the problems of data sparsity and cold start of recommender systems in a dynamic MANET environment.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2017 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC)
Place of PublicationPiscataway, NJ
PublisherIEEE
Pages876-880
Number of pages5
ISBN (Electronic)9781509045884
ISBN (Print)9781509045891
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Mar 2017

Keywords

  • trust
  • trust management
  • recommender system
  • data sparsity
  • cold start
  • mobile ad hoc network
  • MANET

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Social factors for data sparsity problem of trust models in MANETs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this