“Soccer hooligan” studies: giving the Marxist approach another chance

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this article I review key studies in the academic literature on soccer hooliganism. This review does not aim to be complete because this literature is voluminous and growing day by day. The academic theories can be divided into: the early-dominant “figurational” or “process-sociological” approach of Dunning et al.; the “anthropological” approach of Armstrong and Harris; the post-modern approach of Giulianotti; the Marxist approach of Taylor, Clarke, and Hargreaves; the “ethogenic” approach of Marsh; the “psychological reversal theory” approach of Kerr; and the historically sensitive / historical approaches of King and Robson. Later in the article I revisit the Marxist theoretical perspective, originally associated with Ian Taylor. I argue that, although Marxist perspectives are now unfashionable throughout academia, this perspective still has something to offer.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Physical Fitness, Medicine & Treatment in Sports
Volume2
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 2 Apr 2018

Fingerprint

hooligan
soccer
psychological theory
literature

Keywords

  • Australian soccer
  • Crowd behaviour
  • Football hooliganism
  • Marxism
  • Melbourne Knights
  • Neo-tribes
  • Soccer hooliganism
  • Sports history

Cite this

@article{53ed9a4b88a0494eb038f6052f2b164b,
title = "“Soccer hooligan” studies: giving the Marxist approach another chance",
abstract = "In this article I review key studies in the academic literature on soccer hooliganism. This review does not aim to be complete because this literature is voluminous and growing day by day. The academic theories can be divided into: the early-dominant “figurational” or “process-sociological” approach of Dunning et al.; the “anthropological” approach of Armstrong and Harris; the post-modern approach of Giulianotti; the Marxist approach of Taylor, Clarke, and Hargreaves; the “ethogenic” approach of Marsh; the “psychological reversal theory” approach of Kerr; and the historically sensitive / historical approaches of King and Robson. Later in the article I revisit the Marxist theoretical perspective, originally associated with Ian Taylor. I argue that, although Marxist perspectives are now unfashionable throughout academia, this perspective still has something to offer.",
keywords = "Australian soccer, Crowd behaviour, Football hooliganism, Marxism, Melbourne Knights, Neo-tribes, Soccer hooliganism, Sports history",
author = "Kieran James",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "2",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "Journal of Physical Fitness, Medicine & Treatment in Sports",
issn = "2577-2945",
publisher = "Juniper Publishers Inc.",
number = "5",

}

“Soccer hooligan” studies : giving the Marxist approach another chance. / James, Kieran.

In: Journal of Physical Fitness, Medicine & Treatment in Sports, Vol. 2, No. 5, 02.04.2018, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - “Soccer hooligan” studies

T2 - giving the Marxist approach another chance

AU - James, Kieran

PY - 2018/4/2

Y1 - 2018/4/2

N2 - In this article I review key studies in the academic literature on soccer hooliganism. This review does not aim to be complete because this literature is voluminous and growing day by day. The academic theories can be divided into: the early-dominant “figurational” or “process-sociological” approach of Dunning et al.; the “anthropological” approach of Armstrong and Harris; the post-modern approach of Giulianotti; the Marxist approach of Taylor, Clarke, and Hargreaves; the “ethogenic” approach of Marsh; the “psychological reversal theory” approach of Kerr; and the historically sensitive / historical approaches of King and Robson. Later in the article I revisit the Marxist theoretical perspective, originally associated with Ian Taylor. I argue that, although Marxist perspectives are now unfashionable throughout academia, this perspective still has something to offer.

AB - In this article I review key studies in the academic literature on soccer hooliganism. This review does not aim to be complete because this literature is voluminous and growing day by day. The academic theories can be divided into: the early-dominant “figurational” or “process-sociological” approach of Dunning et al.; the “anthropological” approach of Armstrong and Harris; the post-modern approach of Giulianotti; the Marxist approach of Taylor, Clarke, and Hargreaves; the “ethogenic” approach of Marsh; the “psychological reversal theory” approach of Kerr; and the historically sensitive / historical approaches of King and Robson. Later in the article I revisit the Marxist theoretical perspective, originally associated with Ian Taylor. I argue that, although Marxist perspectives are now unfashionable throughout academia, this perspective still has something to offer.

KW - Australian soccer

KW - Crowd behaviour

KW - Football hooliganism

KW - Marxism

KW - Melbourne Knights

KW - Neo-tribes

KW - Soccer hooliganism

KW - Sports history

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - Journal of Physical Fitness, Medicine & Treatment in Sports

JF - Journal of Physical Fitness, Medicine & Treatment in Sports

SN - 2577-2945

IS - 5

ER -