Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Sitting to standing postural changes: energy expenditure and a possible mechanism to alleviate sedentary behavior

  • M. Wang
  • , Y. Song
  • , J.S. Baker
  • , G. Fekete
  • , Y. Gu

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    244 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Background and aims
    Sedentary lifestyles have recently been identified as potential mechanism for obesity and associated metabolic diseases linked to ill health. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of standing and sitting–standing positional changes on energy cost and consequently interrupting sedentary sitting time while working.

    Methods
    A total of 26 healthy male volunteers performed normal typing and editing work for 100 min under three conditions. The conditions included sustained sitting, sustained standing, and sitting–standing alternation every 20 min using a sit–stand desk. Respiratory parameters measured included minute ventilation (VE), oxygen consumption (VO2), and energy expenditure (EE). Measurements were recorded using a calibrated Cosmed K4b2 portable gas analysis system.

    Results
    The mean value for VE was the highest in the standing position (VE = 13.33 ± 0.71), followed by sitting–standing alternation (VE = 12.04 ± 0.62). Both were significantly different from sitting (VE = 10.59 ± 0.69). The maximum VE and EE for standing (VE = 14.81 ± 0.43 and EE = 1.84 ± 0.10) and sitting–standing alternation (VE = 14.80 ± 0.40 and EE = 1.93 ± 0.08) were significantly higher than that of sitting (VE = 12.15 ± 0.42 and EE = 1.67 ± 0.07). No significant differences were observed in the mean VO2 among the three conditions. However, the maximum VO2 for both standing (VO2 = 5.40 ± 0.20) and sitting–standing alternation (VO2 = 5.14 ± 0.17) had shown to be significantly higher than sitting (VO2 = 4.50 ± 0.18). There were no significant differences observed in the mean EE levels between sitting (EE = 1.43 ± 0.07) and sitting–standing alternation (EE = 1.55 ± 0.08). However, the mean EE while standing (EE = 1.62 ± 0.09) significantly increased compared to sitting.

    Conclusions
    The findings of this study indicate that sitting–standing alternations may be implemented as an effective intervention to interrupt prolonged sitting while working.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)157-165
    Number of pages9
    JournalPhysiology International
    Volume105
    Issue number2
    Early online date5 Jul 2018
    DOIs
    Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 5 Jul 2018

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • sedentary behavior
    • sitting-standing alternation
    • energy expenditure
    • health benefits
    • expenditure

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Sitting to standing postural changes: energy expenditure and a possible mechanism to alleviate sedentary behavior'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this