Scrutiny of ministerial ethics and standards of conduct in the UK: diluted accountability?

Sean Kippin, Robert Pyper

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Concerns about the conduct of UK politicians abound. This article assesses the country’s key standards and ethics bodies against fundamental benchmarks of accountability, and argues that their disparate and uncoordinated nature hinders independent scrutiny, and has created a system of accountability characterised by vacuums, varied performance and diluted effectiveness. The key arguments for systemic reform, particularly as they pertain to ministerial standards, are summarised in this article.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)129-138
    Number of pages10
    JournalPublic Money & Management
    Volume45
    Early online date21 May 2024
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 17 Feb 2025

    Keywords

    • accountability
    • codes of conduct
    • Committee on Standards in Public Life (CSPL)
    • parliamentary oversight
    • parliamentary standards
    • UK parliament

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Scrutiny of ministerial ethics and standards of conduct in the UK: diluted accountability?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this