Scotland and the Politics of Intelligence Accountability

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter explores the politics of intelligence accountability in the context of the 2014 referendum on Scottish independence and the 2015 General Election in the UK. Drawing upon Peter Gill’s model for assessing the effectiveness of security intelligence accountability, it argues that the Scottish Government’s proposals for intelligence accountability in an independent Scotland indicated a vague and conservative intention to maintain similar mechanisms to the existing UK political settlement. By exploring the accountability mechanisms for security intelligence in other jurisdictions, this chapter suggests that shortcomings in the Scottish Government’s proposals could have been addressed by learning lessons and adopting practices and processes from beyond the UK. The aftermath of the referendum — particularly the landslide victory in Scotland for the pro-independence SNP in the 2015 UK General Election — may herald consequences for both intelligence accountability in the UK and any future plan for accountability mechanisms in an independent Scotland. The previously unconsidered prospect of direct SNP representation on the UK Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) — now a reality in the UK — raises the scenario that pro-independence politicians will develop the expertise, capital, and political legitimacy necessary for effective intelligence accountability that were lacking in the pre-referendum political landscape.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSecurity in a Small Nation
Subtitle of host publicationScotland, Democracy, Politics
EditorsAndrew Neale
PublisherOpen Book Publishers
Pages125-147
Edition2017
ISBN (Electronic)978-1-78374-270-7, 978-1-78374-271-4, 978-1-78374-272-1
ISBN (Print)978-1-78374-268-4, 978-1-78374-269-1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Mar 2017

Fingerprint

intelligence
responsibility
politics
referendum
election
politician
jurisdiction
legitimacy
expertise
scenario
learning

Keywords

  • Scotland
  • Intelligence
  • Accountability
  • Politics
  • Democracy

Cite this

Atkinson, C. (2017). Scotland and the Politics of Intelligence Accountability. In A. Neale (Ed.), Security in a Small Nation: Scotland, Democracy, Politics (2017 ed., pp. 125-147). Open Book Publishers. https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0078.05
Atkinson, Colin. / Scotland and the Politics of Intelligence Accountability. Security in a Small Nation: Scotland, Democracy, Politics. editor / Andrew Neale. 2017. ed. Open Book Publishers, 2017. pp. 125-147
@inbook{92c7959b48154a87b281b37270b47da7,
title = "Scotland and the Politics of Intelligence Accountability",
abstract = "This chapter explores the politics of intelligence accountability in the context of the 2014 referendum on Scottish independence and the 2015 General Election in the UK. Drawing upon Peter Gill’s model for assessing the effectiveness of security intelligence accountability, it argues that the Scottish Government’s proposals for intelligence accountability in an independent Scotland indicated a vague and conservative intention to maintain similar mechanisms to the existing UK political settlement. By exploring the accountability mechanisms for security intelligence in other jurisdictions, this chapter suggests that shortcomings in the Scottish Government’s proposals could have been addressed by learning lessons and adopting practices and processes from beyond the UK. The aftermath of the referendum — particularly the landslide victory in Scotland for the pro-independence SNP in the 2015 UK General Election — may herald consequences for both intelligence accountability in the UK and any future plan for accountability mechanisms in an independent Scotland. The previously unconsidered prospect of direct SNP representation on the UK Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) — now a reality in the UK — raises the scenario that pro-independence politicians will develop the expertise, capital, and political legitimacy necessary for effective intelligence accountability that were lacking in the pre-referendum political landscape.",
keywords = "Scotland, Intelligence, Accountability, Politics, Democracy",
author = "Colin Atkinson",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "28",
doi = "10.11647/OBP.0078.05",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-78374-268-4",
pages = "125--147",
editor = "Andrew Neale",
booktitle = "Security in a Small Nation",
publisher = "Open Book Publishers",
address = "United Kingdom",
edition = "2017",

}

Atkinson, C 2017, Scotland and the Politics of Intelligence Accountability. in A Neale (ed.), Security in a Small Nation: Scotland, Democracy, Politics. 2017 edn, Open Book Publishers, pp. 125-147. https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0078.05

Scotland and the Politics of Intelligence Accountability. / Atkinson, Colin.

Security in a Small Nation: Scotland, Democracy, Politics. ed. / Andrew Neale. 2017. ed. Open Book Publishers, 2017. p. 125-147.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Scotland and the Politics of Intelligence Accountability

AU - Atkinson, Colin

PY - 2017/3/28

Y1 - 2017/3/28

N2 - This chapter explores the politics of intelligence accountability in the context of the 2014 referendum on Scottish independence and the 2015 General Election in the UK. Drawing upon Peter Gill’s model for assessing the effectiveness of security intelligence accountability, it argues that the Scottish Government’s proposals for intelligence accountability in an independent Scotland indicated a vague and conservative intention to maintain similar mechanisms to the existing UK political settlement. By exploring the accountability mechanisms for security intelligence in other jurisdictions, this chapter suggests that shortcomings in the Scottish Government’s proposals could have been addressed by learning lessons and adopting practices and processes from beyond the UK. The aftermath of the referendum — particularly the landslide victory in Scotland for the pro-independence SNP in the 2015 UK General Election — may herald consequences for both intelligence accountability in the UK and any future plan for accountability mechanisms in an independent Scotland. The previously unconsidered prospect of direct SNP representation on the UK Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) — now a reality in the UK — raises the scenario that pro-independence politicians will develop the expertise, capital, and political legitimacy necessary for effective intelligence accountability that were lacking in the pre-referendum political landscape.

AB - This chapter explores the politics of intelligence accountability in the context of the 2014 referendum on Scottish independence and the 2015 General Election in the UK. Drawing upon Peter Gill’s model for assessing the effectiveness of security intelligence accountability, it argues that the Scottish Government’s proposals for intelligence accountability in an independent Scotland indicated a vague and conservative intention to maintain similar mechanisms to the existing UK political settlement. By exploring the accountability mechanisms for security intelligence in other jurisdictions, this chapter suggests that shortcomings in the Scottish Government’s proposals could have been addressed by learning lessons and adopting practices and processes from beyond the UK. The aftermath of the referendum — particularly the landslide victory in Scotland for the pro-independence SNP in the 2015 UK General Election — may herald consequences for both intelligence accountability in the UK and any future plan for accountability mechanisms in an independent Scotland. The previously unconsidered prospect of direct SNP representation on the UK Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) — now a reality in the UK — raises the scenario that pro-independence politicians will develop the expertise, capital, and political legitimacy necessary for effective intelligence accountability that were lacking in the pre-referendum political landscape.

KW - Scotland

KW - Intelligence

KW - Accountability

KW - Politics

KW - Democracy

U2 - 10.11647/OBP.0078.05

DO - 10.11647/OBP.0078.05

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-1-78374-268-4

SN - 978-1-78374-269-1

SP - 125

EP - 147

BT - Security in a Small Nation

A2 - Neale, Andrew

PB - Open Book Publishers

ER -

Atkinson C. Scotland and the Politics of Intelligence Accountability. In Neale A, editor, Security in a Small Nation: Scotland, Democracy, Politics. 2017 ed. Open Book Publishers. 2017. p. 125-147 https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0078.05