Role requirements in academic recruitment for construction & engineering

Nick Pilcher*, Laurent Galbrun, Nigel Craig, Mike Murray, Alan M. Forster, Stuart Tennant

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
6 Downloads (Pure)


Two ongoing and recurrent debates in the employment of academic staff are (1) how much industry experience should faculty staff have? and (2) what priority is given to research, teaching or both? Such debates take place worldwide and are particularly relevant to vocational subject areas. Through a statistical analysis of circa 200 job adverts for lecturer / assistant professor, senior lecturer / associate professor, and professor / full professor positions in Construction and Engineering posts in the UK, this paper investigates the essential and desirable attributes required for ‘research’, ‘teaching’ and ‘overall requirements’. Analysis shows institutions unmistakably focus on, and coherently recruit for research, but demonstrate very little reasoned approach to recruiting for teaching. Indeed, findings identify ‘administration’ as the key teaching priority. Further empirical analysis demonstrates no significant difference in recruitment strategy before and after the introduction of the Teaching Excellence Framework, despite its aim to put teaching excellence to the fore.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of Engineering Education
Early online date12 Feb 2020
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 12 Feb 2020


  • construction and engineering
  • recruitment
  • research
  • teaching
  • employment attributes


Dive into the research topics of 'Role requirements in academic recruitment for construction & engineering'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this