Reviewing the review: a three dimensional approach to analysing the 2017-2020 review of the House of Lords investigative and scrutiny committees

John Connolly*, Matthew Flinders, David Judge

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Between 2017 and 2020 a comprehensive review of the framework of investigatory scrutiny committees in the House of Lords was undertaken. This process led to a far-reaching set of recommendations and reforms. Although carefully couched in the language of evolutionary change, this article argues that these reforms possess a transformational dynamic that is difficult to deny. The challenge, however, is likely to emerge from the existence of a largely hidden disjuncture between the accountability ambitions embedded within this reform agenda and the institutional, constitutional and political matrixes within which the ‘new’ committee system in the Lords is expected to operate. A three-dimensional lens emphasising inter-, intra-, and extra-institutional dimensions is utilised to expose and dissect the existence of potential disjuncture and, through this, offers a ‘review of the review’ informed by broader literatures on legislative organisation and policy analysis that will be of interest to both practitioners and scholars.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages37
JournalThe Journal of Legislative Studies
Early online date19 Sep 2021
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 19 Sep 2021

Keywords

  • House of Lords
  • select committees
  • scrutiny
  • accountability
  • cross-cutting
  • thematic

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reviewing the review: a three dimensional approach to analysing the 2017-2020 review of the House of Lords investigative and scrutiny committees'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this