Abstract
This paper explores how stakeholders in different socio-cultural contexts engage with RE reform, and the extent to which religious identity engenders polarised debates in the micro-politics of reform in RE essentially because stakeholders want the subject to draw on elements of their particular culture, tradition and theologies. While the outcomes of recent RE reforms in Scotland and Malawi are well known (Conroy, 2014; Matemba, and Addai-Mununkum, 2017), what is less explored in the discourse are stakeholders' perspectives in the role of religious identity in these reforms. The paper attempts to address this issue guided by three key related research questions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Publication status | Published - 14 Apr 2019 |
| Event | Education for Sustainability - Hyatt Regency , San Franscisco, United States Duration: 14 Apr 2019 → 18 Apr 2019 https://cies2019.org/ |
Conference
| Conference | Education for Sustainability |
|---|---|
| Abbreviated title | CIES 2019 |
| Country | United States |
| City | San Franscisco |
| Period | 14/04/19 → 18/04/19 |
| Internet address |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Religion and Religious Education
- Comparative Methodology
- Educational Reform
- Bourdieu
Cite this
}
Religious teaching and learning across diverse cultural settings and contexts. / Matemba, Yonah Hisbon.
2019. Paper presented at Education for Sustainability, San Franscisco, United States.Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper
TY - CONF
T1 - Religious teaching and learning across diverse cultural settings and contexts
AU - Matemba, Yonah Hisbon
PY - 2019/4/14
Y1 - 2019/4/14
N2 - While optimistically (as in England) scholars such as Moulin are beginning to see a strengthened RE (Moulin, 2012), the contemporary status of the subject presents a rather depressing picture and (sic) seemingly unable to shake off the historical"Cinderella" tag (Dierenfield, 1967; Bastide, 2000). As such RE remains the subject schools would rather ignore so that teachers can devote time to "useful" subjects such as Science, Literacy and Numeracy upon which PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment) is based, and the implications of this international assessment in the quality (or lack) of a country's education (Chater and Erricker, 2013; Grek, 2009). Despite its variable treatment in schools (Conroy et al., 2013), in many countries RE has survived mainly for two reasons; first, by law RE is a legal requirement in public schools (e.g. UK), and secondly, as a form of cultural heritage and national identity through the teaching of particular religions (Matemba, 2015; Wardekker and Miedema, 2001; Jackson, 2004). For these reasons, in many countries attempts to bring sweeping reforms in RE engenders fierce debates and contestations (Parker and Freathy, 2011).This paper explores how stakeholders in different socio-cultural contexts engage with RE reform, and the extent to which religious identity engenders polarised debates in the micro-politics of reform in RE essentially because stakeholders want the subject to draw on elements of their particular culture, tradition and theologies. While the outcomes of recent RE reforms in Scotland and Malawi are well known (Conroy, 2014; Matemba, and Addai-Mununkum, 2017), what is less explored in the discourse are stakeholders' perspectives in the role of religious identity in these reforms. The paper attempts to address this issue guided by three key related research questions.
AB - While optimistically (as in England) scholars such as Moulin are beginning to see a strengthened RE (Moulin, 2012), the contemporary status of the subject presents a rather depressing picture and (sic) seemingly unable to shake off the historical"Cinderella" tag (Dierenfield, 1967; Bastide, 2000). As such RE remains the subject schools would rather ignore so that teachers can devote time to "useful" subjects such as Science, Literacy and Numeracy upon which PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment) is based, and the implications of this international assessment in the quality (or lack) of a country's education (Chater and Erricker, 2013; Grek, 2009). Despite its variable treatment in schools (Conroy et al., 2013), in many countries RE has survived mainly for two reasons; first, by law RE is a legal requirement in public schools (e.g. UK), and secondly, as a form of cultural heritage and national identity through the teaching of particular religions (Matemba, 2015; Wardekker and Miedema, 2001; Jackson, 2004). For these reasons, in many countries attempts to bring sweeping reforms in RE engenders fierce debates and contestations (Parker and Freathy, 2011).This paper explores how stakeholders in different socio-cultural contexts engage with RE reform, and the extent to which religious identity engenders polarised debates in the micro-politics of reform in RE essentially because stakeholders want the subject to draw on elements of their particular culture, tradition and theologies. While the outcomes of recent RE reforms in Scotland and Malawi are well known (Conroy, 2014; Matemba, and Addai-Mununkum, 2017), what is less explored in the discourse are stakeholders' perspectives in the role of religious identity in these reforms. The paper attempts to address this issue guided by three key related research questions.
KW - Religion and Religious Education
KW - Comparative Methodology
KW - Educational Reform
KW - Bourdieu
UR - https://cies2019.org/
UR - https://convention2.allacademic.com/one/cies/cies19/index.php?cmd=Online+Program+View+Person&selected_people_id=9897754&PHPSESSID=c683r21sq2bqpdotlmg37871k3
M3 - Paper
ER -