Reliability of postal questionnaires for the Glasgow Outcome Scale

J.T.L. Wilson, P Edwards, H Fiddes, Elaine Stewart, Graham M Teasdale

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to investigate if a questionnaire sent by mail can give a reliable assessment of outcome on the Glasgow Outcome Scale. A questionnaire was developed for the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) and a second questionnaire for the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE). The questionnaires were self-contained and designed to be completed by either a head-injured person or a proxy. The questionnaires were studied in two ways: each questionnaire was administered twice (at an interval of approximately 2 weeks), and ratings from the postal questionnaires were compared to ratings from a structured interview conducted by telephone. The four studies were carried out in separate groups of head-injured participants consisting of 32-38 individuals. For the test-retest comparison, k(w) (quadratic weights) was 0.94 for the GOS questionnaire and 0.98 for the GOSE questionnaire. For the comparison with the telephone interview, k(w) was 0.67 for the GOS and 0.92 for the GOSE. The values of k(w) indicate good agreement for all comparisons. We conclude that it is possible to obtain reliable outcome data after head injury using postal questionnaires.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)999-1005
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Neurotrauma
Volume19
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Glasgow Outcome Scale
Head
Surveys and Questionnaires
Interviews
Postal Service
Proxy
Craniocerebral Trauma
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Keywords

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Craniocerebral Trauma
  • Disability Evaluation
  • Glasgow Outcome Scale
  • Humans
  • Interviews as Topic
  • Middle Aged
  • Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
  • Postal Service
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Cite this

Wilson, J.T.L. ; Edwards, P ; Fiddes, H ; Stewart, Elaine ; Teasdale, Graham M. / Reliability of postal questionnaires for the Glasgow Outcome Scale. In: Journal of Neurotrauma. 2002 ; Vol. 19, No. 9. pp. 999-1005.
@article{ca9d7d658e0f45e8bbade42bb50c21fe,
title = "Reliability of postal questionnaires for the Glasgow Outcome Scale",
abstract = "The purpose of the study was to investigate if a questionnaire sent by mail can give a reliable assessment of outcome on the Glasgow Outcome Scale. A questionnaire was developed for the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) and a second questionnaire for the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE). The questionnaires were self-contained and designed to be completed by either a head-injured person or a proxy. The questionnaires were studied in two ways: each questionnaire was administered twice (at an interval of approximately 2 weeks), and ratings from the postal questionnaires were compared to ratings from a structured interview conducted by telephone. The four studies were carried out in separate groups of head-injured participants consisting of 32-38 individuals. For the test-retest comparison, k(w) (quadratic weights) was 0.94 for the GOS questionnaire and 0.98 for the GOSE questionnaire. For the comparison with the telephone interview, k(w) was 0.67 for the GOS and 0.92 for the GOSE. The values of k(w) indicate good agreement for all comparisons. We conclude that it is possible to obtain reliable outcome data after head injury using postal questionnaires.",
keywords = "Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Craniocerebral Trauma, Disability Evaluation, Glasgow Outcome Scale, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Middle Aged, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), Postal Service, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity, Surveys and Questionnaires, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't",
author = "J.T.L. Wilson and P Edwards and H Fiddes and Elaine Stewart and Teasdale, {Graham M}",
year = "2002",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1089/089771502760341910",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "999--1005",
journal = "Journal of Neurotrauma",
issn = "0897-7151",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "9",

}

Reliability of postal questionnaires for the Glasgow Outcome Scale. / Wilson, J.T.L.; Edwards, P; Fiddes, H; Stewart, Elaine; Teasdale, Graham M.

In: Journal of Neurotrauma, Vol. 19, No. 9, 09.2002, p. 999-1005.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability of postal questionnaires for the Glasgow Outcome Scale

AU - Wilson, J.T.L.

AU - Edwards, P

AU - Fiddes, H

AU - Stewart, Elaine

AU - Teasdale, Graham M

PY - 2002/9

Y1 - 2002/9

N2 - The purpose of the study was to investigate if a questionnaire sent by mail can give a reliable assessment of outcome on the Glasgow Outcome Scale. A questionnaire was developed for the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) and a second questionnaire for the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE). The questionnaires were self-contained and designed to be completed by either a head-injured person or a proxy. The questionnaires were studied in two ways: each questionnaire was administered twice (at an interval of approximately 2 weeks), and ratings from the postal questionnaires were compared to ratings from a structured interview conducted by telephone. The four studies were carried out in separate groups of head-injured participants consisting of 32-38 individuals. For the test-retest comparison, k(w) (quadratic weights) was 0.94 for the GOS questionnaire and 0.98 for the GOSE questionnaire. For the comparison with the telephone interview, k(w) was 0.67 for the GOS and 0.92 for the GOSE. The values of k(w) indicate good agreement for all comparisons. We conclude that it is possible to obtain reliable outcome data after head injury using postal questionnaires.

AB - The purpose of the study was to investigate if a questionnaire sent by mail can give a reliable assessment of outcome on the Glasgow Outcome Scale. A questionnaire was developed for the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) and a second questionnaire for the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE). The questionnaires were self-contained and designed to be completed by either a head-injured person or a proxy. The questionnaires were studied in two ways: each questionnaire was administered twice (at an interval of approximately 2 weeks), and ratings from the postal questionnaires were compared to ratings from a structured interview conducted by telephone. The four studies were carried out in separate groups of head-injured participants consisting of 32-38 individuals. For the test-retest comparison, k(w) (quadratic weights) was 0.94 for the GOS questionnaire and 0.98 for the GOSE questionnaire. For the comparison with the telephone interview, k(w) was 0.67 for the GOS and 0.92 for the GOSE. The values of k(w) indicate good agreement for all comparisons. We conclude that it is possible to obtain reliable outcome data after head injury using postal questionnaires.

KW - Adolescent

KW - Adult

KW - Aged

KW - Craniocerebral Trauma

KW - Disability Evaluation

KW - Glasgow Outcome Scale

KW - Humans

KW - Interviews as Topic

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

KW - Postal Service

KW - Reproducibility of Results

KW - Sensitivity and Specificity

KW - Surveys and Questionnaires

KW - Comparative Study

KW - Journal Article

KW - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

U2 - 10.1089/089771502760341910

DO - 10.1089/089771502760341910

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 999

EP - 1005

JO - Journal of Neurotrauma

JF - Journal of Neurotrauma

SN - 0897-7151

IS - 9

ER -