Reflections concerning ethnographic ethical decisions and neo-liberal monitoring

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Hypothetical, speculative ethical concerns are no match for real situations. As such, this paper argues that there is an unsurpassable gap between planned, prescriptive ethics and real-time, relational, ethnographic decision making. This gap is most evident in that the enforcement of procedural ethics may actually prevent the development of ethnographic work. Also, we critically assess procedural ethics as being not really about ethics, but rather about the risk management embedded in contemporary academia. We organize ethical issues in three political vectors (the ethnographer him/herself, the relationships with the people in the field, and the ethnographic texts), and then offer suggestions for a humanistic research ethics that involves reclaiming the researchers’ ethical power, enlarging the notion of what is ethical, and accepting that there is a darker side to ethnography. The account offered here is based on the ethnographic experience of Portuguese and Scottish-based researchers.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)241-258
JournalEtnográfica
Volume22
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2018

Fingerprint

moral philosophy
monitoring
research ethics
risk management
ethnography
decision making
experience

Cite this

@article{c7beb4e9aac44a07b6b0cc4e0d72753d,
title = "Reflections concerning ethnographic ethical decisions and neo-liberal monitoring",
abstract = "Hypothetical, speculative ethical concerns are no match for real situations. As such, this paper argues that there is an unsurpassable gap between planned, prescriptive ethics and real-time, relational, ethnographic decision making. This gap is most evident in that the enforcement of procedural ethics may actually prevent the development of ethnographic work. Also, we critically assess procedural ethics as being not really about ethics, but rather about the risk management embedded in contemporary academia. We organize ethical issues in three political vectors (the ethnographer him/herself, the relationships with the people in the field, and the ethnographic texts), and then offer suggestions for a humanistic research ethics that involves reclaiming the researchers’ ethical power, enlarging the notion of what is ethical, and accepting that there is a darker side to ethnography. The account offered here is based on the ethnographic experience of Portuguese and Scottish-based researchers.",
author = "Tiago Neves and Christopher Holligan and Ross Deuchar",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "241--258",
journal = "Etnogr{\'a}fica",
issn = "0873-6561",
publisher = "Centro em Rede de Investiga{\cc}{\~a}o em Antropologia",
number = "2",

}

Reflections concerning ethnographic ethical decisions and neo-liberal monitoring. / Neves, Tiago; Holligan, Christopher; Deuchar, Ross.

In: Etnográfica, Vol. 22, No. 2, 01.06.2018, p. 241-258.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reflections concerning ethnographic ethical decisions and neo-liberal monitoring

AU - Neves, Tiago

AU - Holligan, Christopher

AU - Deuchar, Ross

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - Hypothetical, speculative ethical concerns are no match for real situations. As such, this paper argues that there is an unsurpassable gap between planned, prescriptive ethics and real-time, relational, ethnographic decision making. This gap is most evident in that the enforcement of procedural ethics may actually prevent the development of ethnographic work. Also, we critically assess procedural ethics as being not really about ethics, but rather about the risk management embedded in contemporary academia. We organize ethical issues in three political vectors (the ethnographer him/herself, the relationships with the people in the field, and the ethnographic texts), and then offer suggestions for a humanistic research ethics that involves reclaiming the researchers’ ethical power, enlarging the notion of what is ethical, and accepting that there is a darker side to ethnography. The account offered here is based on the ethnographic experience of Portuguese and Scottish-based researchers.

AB - Hypothetical, speculative ethical concerns are no match for real situations. As such, this paper argues that there is an unsurpassable gap between planned, prescriptive ethics and real-time, relational, ethnographic decision making. This gap is most evident in that the enforcement of procedural ethics may actually prevent the development of ethnographic work. Also, we critically assess procedural ethics as being not really about ethics, but rather about the risk management embedded in contemporary academia. We organize ethical issues in three political vectors (the ethnographer him/herself, the relationships with the people in the field, and the ethnographic texts), and then offer suggestions for a humanistic research ethics that involves reclaiming the researchers’ ethical power, enlarging the notion of what is ethical, and accepting that there is a darker side to ethnography. The account offered here is based on the ethnographic experience of Portuguese and Scottish-based researchers.

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 241

EP - 258

JO - Etnográfica

JF - Etnográfica

SN - 0873-6561

IS - 2

ER -