Re-conceptualizing authority relations in education: a micro-situational approach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article explores the conception of authority relations in the classroom that are implicit in some examples of related policy documentation in Scotland and England. We argue that the importance of the constitutive role of the micro-dynamics of face-to-face interaction in classroom settings is neglected in documentation of this type. We explore this claim with reference to examples of policy in two jurisdictions of the UK, namely The Donaldson Review and The Standards for Registration in Scotland; and policy-related guidance from England on improving discipline in schools and pupils’ behaviour. We also consider how authority relations are conceptualised in a recent article that has made a significant contribution to the literature in the field (Macleod et al, 2012). Finally, we present a theoretical account that counterbalances prevailing approaches to authority relations in the classroom. We suggest that authority is continuously negotiated, challenged, accepted, defined, and ultimately constituted in and through the dynamics of interaction between and amongst pupils (and between pupils and teachers).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalCritical Studies in Education
Early online date28 Jun 2017
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 28 Jun 2017

Fingerprint

classroom
documentation
pupil
education
pupil behavior
interaction
jurisdiction
teacher
school
literature

Cite this

@article{844795cf67fc4928bc39b5482d1420ec,
title = "Re-conceptualizing authority relations in education: a micro-situational approach",
abstract = "This article explores the conception of authority relations in the classroom that are implicit in some examples of related policy documentation in Scotland and England. We argue that the importance of the constitutive role of the micro-dynamics of face-to-face interaction in classroom settings is neglected in documentation of this type. We explore this claim with reference to examples of policy in two jurisdictions of the UK, namely The Donaldson Review and The Standards for Registration in Scotland; and policy-related guidance from England on improving discipline in schools and pupils’ behaviour. We also consider how authority relations are conceptualised in a recent article that has made a significant contribution to the literature in the field (Macleod et al, 2012). Finally, we present a theoretical account that counterbalances prevailing approaches to authority relations in the classroom. We suggest that authority is continuously negotiated, challenged, accepted, defined, and ultimately constituted in and through the dynamics of interaction between and amongst pupils (and between pupils and teachers).",
author = "Anne Pirrie and Irene Rafanell",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1080/17508487.2017.1343198",
language = "English",
pages = "1--14",
journal = "Critical Studies in Education",
issn = "1750-8487",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Re-conceptualizing authority relations in education

T2 - a micro-situational approach

AU - Pirrie, Anne

AU - Rafanell, Irene

PY - 2017/6/28

Y1 - 2017/6/28

N2 - This article explores the conception of authority relations in the classroom that are implicit in some examples of related policy documentation in Scotland and England. We argue that the importance of the constitutive role of the micro-dynamics of face-to-face interaction in classroom settings is neglected in documentation of this type. We explore this claim with reference to examples of policy in two jurisdictions of the UK, namely The Donaldson Review and The Standards for Registration in Scotland; and policy-related guidance from England on improving discipline in schools and pupils’ behaviour. We also consider how authority relations are conceptualised in a recent article that has made a significant contribution to the literature in the field (Macleod et al, 2012). Finally, we present a theoretical account that counterbalances prevailing approaches to authority relations in the classroom. We suggest that authority is continuously negotiated, challenged, accepted, defined, and ultimately constituted in and through the dynamics of interaction between and amongst pupils (and between pupils and teachers).

AB - This article explores the conception of authority relations in the classroom that are implicit in some examples of related policy documentation in Scotland and England. We argue that the importance of the constitutive role of the micro-dynamics of face-to-face interaction in classroom settings is neglected in documentation of this type. We explore this claim with reference to examples of policy in two jurisdictions of the UK, namely The Donaldson Review and The Standards for Registration in Scotland; and policy-related guidance from England on improving discipline in schools and pupils’ behaviour. We also consider how authority relations are conceptualised in a recent article that has made a significant contribution to the literature in the field (Macleod et al, 2012). Finally, we present a theoretical account that counterbalances prevailing approaches to authority relations in the classroom. We suggest that authority is continuously negotiated, challenged, accepted, defined, and ultimately constituted in and through the dynamics of interaction between and amongst pupils (and between pupils and teachers).

U2 - 10.1080/17508487.2017.1343198

DO - 10.1080/17508487.2017.1343198

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 14

JO - Critical Studies in Education

JF - Critical Studies in Education

SN - 1750-8487

ER -