Qualitative entrepreneurship authorship: antecedents, processes and consequences

Robert Smith, Gerard McElwee, Seonaidh McDonald, Sarah Drakopoulou Dodd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to report on a review of the writing practices and experiences of scholars who have published qualitative papers in the field of entrepreneurship. It evaluates existing knowledge about how “well‐published” entrepreneurship scholars go about writing up qualitative research. It identifies the antecedents, processes, and consequences of qualitative research authorship as self‐described by authors.

Design/methodology/approach
Scholars who had published qualitative papers in the five top‐ranked entrepreneurship journals over a 20‐year period were asked to complete a qualitative survey about their writing practices. A qualitative analysis of 37 usable replies was undertaken.

FindingsEntrepreneurship scholars perceive their qualitative research writing to be more enriching and philosophical than quantitative research. Although they feel strong connections with their research subjects, they find qualitative research difficult and time consuming to write up. It is hard to bridge the gap between working with large amounts of transcribed data and the editorial requirements of journals, without losing the vitality of data. Qualitative research and subsequent writing skills have often been learned by trial and error. Many are inspired by specific texts, which may include novels, poems or plays.

Practical implicationsThis work shows how useful it is to discuss qualitative writing processes so that we may learn from the “blood, toil, tears and sweat” of those who have already successfully navigated both the writing and publishing of qualitative research.

Originality/valueAlthough there is a vigorous debate within the entrepreneurship literature about the prevalence and suitability of different methods and methodological approaches, there is no explicit discussion of how researchers engage with writing up qualitative research for publication. The paper addresses this gap and shares insights and guidance from our community of practice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)364-386
Number of pages23
JournalInternational Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Entrepreneurship
Authorship
Qualitative research
Qualitative analysis
Communities of practice
Quantitative research
Guidance
Design methodology

Keywords

  • research work
  • entrepreneurialism
  • qualitative entrepreneurship research
  • qualitative research
  • writing qualitatively
  • storytelling

Cite this

Smith, Robert ; McElwee, Gerard ; McDonald, Seonaidh ; Dodd, Sarah Drakopoulou. / Qualitative entrepreneurship authorship : antecedents, processes and consequences. In: International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. 2013 ; Vol. 19, No. 4. pp. 364-386.
@article{8fe1b8a1ce1f446a837141590456a779,
title = "Qualitative entrepreneurship authorship: antecedents, processes and consequences",
abstract = "PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to report on a review of the writing practices and experiences of scholars who have published qualitative papers in the field of entrepreneurship. It evaluates existing knowledge about how “well‐published” entrepreneurship scholars go about writing up qualitative research. It identifies the antecedents, processes, and consequences of qualitative research authorship as self‐described by authors.Design/methodology/approachScholars who had published qualitative papers in the five top‐ranked entrepreneurship journals over a 20‐year period were asked to complete a qualitative survey about their writing practices. A qualitative analysis of 37 usable replies was undertaken.FindingsEntrepreneurship scholars perceive their qualitative research writing to be more enriching and philosophical than quantitative research. Although they feel strong connections with their research subjects, they find qualitative research difficult and time consuming to write up. It is hard to bridge the gap between working with large amounts of transcribed data and the editorial requirements of journals, without losing the vitality of data. Qualitative research and subsequent writing skills have often been learned by trial and error. Many are inspired by specific texts, which may include novels, poems or plays.Practical implicationsThis work shows how useful it is to discuss qualitative writing processes so that we may learn from the “blood, toil, tears and sweat” of those who have already successfully navigated both the writing and publishing of qualitative research.Originality/valueAlthough there is a vigorous debate within the entrepreneurship literature about the prevalence and suitability of different methods and methodological approaches, there is no explicit discussion of how researchers engage with writing up qualitative research for publication. The paper addresses this gap and shares insights and guidance from our community of practice.",
keywords = "research work, entrepreneurialism, qualitative entrepreneurship research, qualitative research, writing qualitatively, storytelling",
author = "Robert Smith and Gerard McElwee and Seonaidh McDonald and Dodd, {Sarah Drakopoulou}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1108/IJEBR-11-2010-0179",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "364--386",
journal = "International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research",
issn = "1355-2554",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
number = "4",

}

Qualitative entrepreneurship authorship : antecedents, processes and consequences. / Smith, Robert; McElwee, Gerard; McDonald, Seonaidh; Dodd, Sarah Drakopoulou.

In: International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2013, p. 364-386.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Qualitative entrepreneurship authorship

T2 - antecedents, processes and consequences

AU - Smith, Robert

AU - McElwee, Gerard

AU - McDonald, Seonaidh

AU - Dodd, Sarah Drakopoulou

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to report on a review of the writing practices and experiences of scholars who have published qualitative papers in the field of entrepreneurship. It evaluates existing knowledge about how “well‐published” entrepreneurship scholars go about writing up qualitative research. It identifies the antecedents, processes, and consequences of qualitative research authorship as self‐described by authors.Design/methodology/approachScholars who had published qualitative papers in the five top‐ranked entrepreneurship journals over a 20‐year period were asked to complete a qualitative survey about their writing practices. A qualitative analysis of 37 usable replies was undertaken.FindingsEntrepreneurship scholars perceive their qualitative research writing to be more enriching and philosophical than quantitative research. Although they feel strong connections with their research subjects, they find qualitative research difficult and time consuming to write up. It is hard to bridge the gap between working with large amounts of transcribed data and the editorial requirements of journals, without losing the vitality of data. Qualitative research and subsequent writing skills have often been learned by trial and error. Many are inspired by specific texts, which may include novels, poems or plays.Practical implicationsThis work shows how useful it is to discuss qualitative writing processes so that we may learn from the “blood, toil, tears and sweat” of those who have already successfully navigated both the writing and publishing of qualitative research.Originality/valueAlthough there is a vigorous debate within the entrepreneurship literature about the prevalence and suitability of different methods and methodological approaches, there is no explicit discussion of how researchers engage with writing up qualitative research for publication. The paper addresses this gap and shares insights and guidance from our community of practice.

AB - PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to report on a review of the writing practices and experiences of scholars who have published qualitative papers in the field of entrepreneurship. It evaluates existing knowledge about how “well‐published” entrepreneurship scholars go about writing up qualitative research. It identifies the antecedents, processes, and consequences of qualitative research authorship as self‐described by authors.Design/methodology/approachScholars who had published qualitative papers in the five top‐ranked entrepreneurship journals over a 20‐year period were asked to complete a qualitative survey about their writing practices. A qualitative analysis of 37 usable replies was undertaken.FindingsEntrepreneurship scholars perceive their qualitative research writing to be more enriching and philosophical than quantitative research. Although they feel strong connections with their research subjects, they find qualitative research difficult and time consuming to write up. It is hard to bridge the gap between working with large amounts of transcribed data and the editorial requirements of journals, without losing the vitality of data. Qualitative research and subsequent writing skills have often been learned by trial and error. Many are inspired by specific texts, which may include novels, poems or plays.Practical implicationsThis work shows how useful it is to discuss qualitative writing processes so that we may learn from the “blood, toil, tears and sweat” of those who have already successfully navigated both the writing and publishing of qualitative research.Originality/valueAlthough there is a vigorous debate within the entrepreneurship literature about the prevalence and suitability of different methods and methodological approaches, there is no explicit discussion of how researchers engage with writing up qualitative research for publication. The paper addresses this gap and shares insights and guidance from our community of practice.

KW - research work

KW - entrepreneurialism

KW - qualitative entrepreneurship research

KW - qualitative research

KW - writing qualitatively

KW - storytelling

U2 - 10.1108/IJEBR-11-2010-0179

DO - 10.1108/IJEBR-11-2010-0179

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 364

EP - 386

JO - International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research

JF - International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research

SN - 1355-2554

IS - 4

ER -