Provoking students’ engagement in physical and digital classrooms: an ACARD-SR model in the South-East Asian context

Jude Emelifeonwu*, Samuel Ogbeibu

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstractpeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The country with the highest power-distance index score in the world is Malaysia, and this is reflected in a national culture that negatively influences students’ learning experiences (Green, 2013; Hofstede, 1998). Hofstede (1998) defines power distance as the degree to which the less influential participants (students) in an institution assume and agree that authority (such as the teaching practitioner) is allocated disproportionately. As a result, students are confronted with the complexity of ineffectively communicating their ideas openly in class, and especially in a hybrid learning environment (physical and virtual classrooms) catalysed by the Covid 19 impact (Harland et al., 2013). This consequently amplifies teaching practitioners’ task of getting students to keenly contribute and engage in the learning exchange experience (Mendes & Hammett, 2020). This challenge becomes more evident when there is a convocation of local and international students incorporated to promote cultural diversity in the classroom (Ryan & Viete, 2009). Though a high power-distance society helps to encourage students’ knowledge memorization and usage, it however, hinders socio-academic exchanges necessary for cross-fertilization of knowledge (Dimmock & Walker, 2005; Salleh et al., 2018). Knowledge memorization and application among other rationales perhaps explains the reason why some Malaysian students have struggled to excel in the field of management, in comparison with core science subjects (Salleh et al., 2018). Congruently, existing literature yet lack sufficient evidence that informs on how students’ classroom engagement could be bolstered accordingly. By also recognising rising technological and digital advancements, we therefore, seek to explore how students’ engagement can be further engendered in a physical and digital classroom. Consequently, the ACARD-SR model is examined to emphasize how student’s engagement may be stimulated via acquisition, cross-fertilization, assimilation, retaining, demonstrating, sourcing of feedback and re-evaluating knowledge in a hybrid system.The ACARD-SR model is anchored on social learning, collaborative, and scaffolding theories (Glazewski,and Hmelo-Silver. 2019; Coulson, and Harvey, 2013; Harland, Raja Hussain, and Bakar, 2013). Successful implementation of the ACARD-SR model is contingent on efficient deployment of the learning exchange ecosystem (LEE). LEE consists of drivers such as learning exchange mode, information support systems, learning climate/environment, students’ equality and diversity, and social interaction. These drivers help to inspire students’ willingness to become actively engaged in ACARD-SR initiatives. Fig. 1: The ACARD-SR modelThe ACARD-SR model first deals with the acquisition of knowledge between a culturally diverse group of students. The pursuit to acquire knowledge will then provoke a cross-fertilization of students’ opinions. An efficient cross-fertilization activity will engender several neural routes for students to assimilate knowledge gained from peers and their lecturers. Likewise, by employing the scaffolding theoretical assumptions, students can retain knowledge. Before each lesson, gamification (Kahoot/mentimeter games) is used to revise and assess individual student’s knowledge of previous lessons. After each lesson delivery, team presentations are done before everyone in class as each team demonstrates defined knowledge by discussing and applying solutions to issues identified. Subsequently, the lecturer instigates a source feedback gathering session where all class participants, including the lecturers obtain feedback about the learning exchange process from each other. During the sixth week of the semester, a much comprehensive appraisal congruent with the source feedback session, is circulated to students to assess the learning exchange practice. Students anonymously offer remarks about the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats, and suggests proposals for advancing the ACARD-SR tenets. Next, the re-evaluation stage which conveys an appropriate collation and analysis of students’ surveys is performed. Additionally, new knowledge is acquired, and the ACARD-SR model cycle is consequently repeated to guarantee sustainability of the improved learning exchange experience. Nevertheless, knowledge acquisition in this model is contingent on the strategic integration of a diverse group of students working together in a team. A summary of methodology employed are students’ observations in the hybrid system, frequent interactions via WhatsApp before and during the Covid-19 season. Equally, students’ comments in university-wide surveys known as “Re-ValuAte” are used consistently. Lastly, academic reports of student’s performance between Caleb university (pseudonym used) in Malaysia and the main campus in Australia were examined. Furthermore, a key finding obtained from implementing the ACARD-SR model indicates that from 2018 – 2020, examination results of undergraduate students who were taught via the ACARD-SR tenets in Malaysia outperformed their counterparts in Australia where the model was not utilized.Keywords: ACARD-SR model; Students’ engagement; Physical and digital classrooms Hybrid system; Learning exchange ecosystem (LEE)ReferencesCoulson, D., & Harvey, M. (2013). Scaffolding student reflection for experience-based learning: a framework. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(4), 401–413. doi:10.1080/13562517.2012.752726 Dimmock, C & Walker, A (2005) Educational leadership: Culture and Diversity. Sage, LondonGlazewski, K.D. and Hmelo-Silver, C.E. (2019), "Scaffolding and supporting use of information for ambitious learning practices", Information and Learning Sciences, Vol. 120 No. 1/2, pp. 39-58. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-08-2018-0087Hofstede, G. (1998). ‘Masculinity and Feminity’. The Taboo Dimension of National Cultures. Thousand Oaks CA: SageHarland, T., Raja Hussain, R. M., & Bakar, A. A. (2013). The scholarship of teaching and learning: challenges for Malaysian academics. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(1), 38–48. doi:10.1080/13562517.2013.827654 Jayawardena, N.S. (2020), "The e-learning persuasion through gamification: an elaboration likelihood model perspective", Young Consumers, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-08-2020-1201Mendes, A., & Hammett, D. (2020) The new tyranny of student participation? Student voice and the paradox of strategic-active student-citizens, Teaching in Higher Education, DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2020.1783227Ryan, J & Viete, R (2009) Respectful interactions: learning with international students in the English-speaking academy, Teaching in Higher Education, 14:3, 303-314, DOI: 10.1080/13562510902898866Salleh, N., Emelifeonwu, J., Chan, K.M. and Winterton, J. (2019). Work readiness in Malaysia. In Transitions from Education to Work: Workforce ready challenges in the Asia Pacific. Routledge. [ISBN: 978-1-138-69175-9].
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 23 Jun 2021
EventTeaching & Learning (MKE) Conference 2021 - Online, United Kingdom
Duration: 23 Jun 2021 → …
https://www.bam.ac.uk/events-landing/ems-event-calendar/teaching-learning-mke-conference-2021.html

Conference

ConferenceTeaching & Learning (MKE) Conference 2021
Country/TerritoryUnited Kingdom
Period23/06/21 → …
Internet address

Keywords

  • ACARD-SR model
  • students' engagement
  • physical and digital classrooms hybrid system
  • learning exchange ecosystem (LEE)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Provoking students’ engagement in physical and digital classrooms: an ACARD-SR model in the South-East Asian context'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this