Processing inferences drawn from the logically equivalent frames half full and half empty

Joanne Ingram, Christopher J. Hand, Linda M. Moxey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Choice-based experiments indicate that readers draw sophisticated inferences from logically equivalent frames. Readers may infer that a glass was previously ‘full’ if described as currently ‘half empty’, and previously ‘empty’ if described as currently ‘half full’ (McKenzie & Nelson, 2003). The information leakage framework suggests these inferences are made because information about a previous state is leaked from speaker’s choice of frame. We examine if similar inferences are made during reading in two eye-tracking experiments. In Experiment 1, participants read a passage where a character describes a glass as currently “half full” or “half empty” before making a statement about the previous volume. We hypothesized that participants would infer that the glass was previously “empty” or “full” respectively. Results suggest processing a previous volume of “full” is simpler regardless of the frame provided. In Experiment 2, materials were constructed to ensure inferences were based on participants’ beliefs as opposed to characters’. Results support the information leakage framework; previous volumes of “full” and “empty” were processed more easily after current volumes of “half empty” and “half full” respectively. We suggest that processing discrepancies between the two experiments are driven by word-related factors (e.g. markedness) or by participants’ integration of characters’ expectations.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)799-817
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Cognitive Psychology
Volume26
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Sep 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Glass
Reading

Keywords

  • framing
  • inference
  • eye movements

Cite this

@article{4c83bab395204725938ce96a85ee261e,
title = "Processing inferences drawn from the logically equivalent frames half full and half empty",
abstract = "Choice-based experiments indicate that readers draw sophisticated inferences from logically equivalent frames. Readers may infer that a glass was previously ‘full’ if described as currently ‘half empty’, and previously ‘empty’ if described as currently ‘half full’ (McKenzie & Nelson, 2003). The information leakage framework suggests these inferences are made because information about a previous state is leaked from speaker’s choice of frame. We examine if similar inferences are made during reading in two eye-tracking experiments. In Experiment 1, participants read a passage where a character describes a glass as currently “half full” or “half empty” before making a statement about the previous volume. We hypothesized that participants would infer that the glass was previously “empty” or “full” respectively. Results suggest processing a previous volume of “full” is simpler regardless of the frame provided. In Experiment 2, materials were constructed to ensure inferences were based on participants’ beliefs as opposed to characters’. Results support the information leakage framework; previous volumes of “full” and “empty” were processed more easily after current volumes of “half empty” and “half full” respectively. We suggest that processing discrepancies between the two experiments are driven by word-related factors (e.g. markedness) or by participants’ integration of characters’ expectations.",
keywords = "framing, inference, eye movements",
author = "Joanne Ingram and Hand, {Christopher J.} and Moxey, {Linda M.}",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1080/20445911.2014.956747",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "799--817",
journal = "Journal of Cognitive Psychology",
issn = "2044-5911",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "7",

}

Processing inferences drawn from the logically equivalent frames half full and half empty. / Ingram, Joanne; Hand, Christopher J.; Moxey, Linda M.

In: Journal of Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 26, No. 7, 18.09.2014, p. 799-817.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Processing inferences drawn from the logically equivalent frames half full and half empty

AU - Ingram, Joanne

AU - Hand, Christopher J.

AU - Moxey, Linda M.

PY - 2014/9/18

Y1 - 2014/9/18

N2 - Choice-based experiments indicate that readers draw sophisticated inferences from logically equivalent frames. Readers may infer that a glass was previously ‘full’ if described as currently ‘half empty’, and previously ‘empty’ if described as currently ‘half full’ (McKenzie & Nelson, 2003). The information leakage framework suggests these inferences are made because information about a previous state is leaked from speaker’s choice of frame. We examine if similar inferences are made during reading in two eye-tracking experiments. In Experiment 1, participants read a passage where a character describes a glass as currently “half full” or “half empty” before making a statement about the previous volume. We hypothesized that participants would infer that the glass was previously “empty” or “full” respectively. Results suggest processing a previous volume of “full” is simpler regardless of the frame provided. In Experiment 2, materials were constructed to ensure inferences were based on participants’ beliefs as opposed to characters’. Results support the information leakage framework; previous volumes of “full” and “empty” were processed more easily after current volumes of “half empty” and “half full” respectively. We suggest that processing discrepancies between the two experiments are driven by word-related factors (e.g. markedness) or by participants’ integration of characters’ expectations.

AB - Choice-based experiments indicate that readers draw sophisticated inferences from logically equivalent frames. Readers may infer that a glass was previously ‘full’ if described as currently ‘half empty’, and previously ‘empty’ if described as currently ‘half full’ (McKenzie & Nelson, 2003). The information leakage framework suggests these inferences are made because information about a previous state is leaked from speaker’s choice of frame. We examine if similar inferences are made during reading in two eye-tracking experiments. In Experiment 1, participants read a passage where a character describes a glass as currently “half full” or “half empty” before making a statement about the previous volume. We hypothesized that participants would infer that the glass was previously “empty” or “full” respectively. Results suggest processing a previous volume of “full” is simpler regardless of the frame provided. In Experiment 2, materials were constructed to ensure inferences were based on participants’ beliefs as opposed to characters’. Results support the information leakage framework; previous volumes of “full” and “empty” were processed more easily after current volumes of “half empty” and “half full” respectively. We suggest that processing discrepancies between the two experiments are driven by word-related factors (e.g. markedness) or by participants’ integration of characters’ expectations.

KW - framing

KW - inference

KW - eye movements

U2 - 10.1080/20445911.2014.956747

DO - 10.1080/20445911.2014.956747

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 799

EP - 817

JO - Journal of Cognitive Psychology

JF - Journal of Cognitive Psychology

SN - 2044-5911

IS - 7

ER -