Abstract
‘Career Academics’ are principally research-led, and enter academia with limited or no industrial or practical experience. UK Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) welcome them for their potential to attain research grant funding and publish world-leading journal papers, ultimately enhancing institutional reputation. This polemical paper problematizes the Career Academic around three areas: their institutional appeal; their impact on the student experience, team dynamics and broader academic functions and; current strategic policy to employ them. We also argue recent UK government teaching-focused initiatives will not address the need to employ practical academics, or ‘Pracademics’, albeit in a predominantly vocational discipline such as Construction and Engineering Education. We generate questions for policy makers, institutions, and those implementing strategy. We argue research is key, but partial rebalancing will achieve a diverse academic skill base to achieve contextualised construction and engineering education. In a wider European context, the paper resonates with issues of academic ‘drift’ and provides reflection for others on the UK context.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1477-1495 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | European Journal of Engineering Education |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| Early online date | 4 Apr 2017 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 12 Dec 2017 |
Keywords
- REF
- TEF
- professional industrial experience
- career academic
- Recruitment policy
- Construction and Engineering Education