Power output of legs during high intensity cycle ergometry

influence of hand grip

Julien Baker, Julianna Gal, Bruce Davies, Damien Bailey, Rhian Morgan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Traditionally, leg cycle ergometry is used to assess the power output of the lower limbs. However, it is suspected that the upper body makes a significant, albeit as yet unknown, contribution to the measured power output, and as such, the lean mass of the whole body should be considered during ergometric assessment. To test this idea, indices of mechanical power output were obtained from 11 subjects during high intensity leg cycle ergometry tests (20 second duration; 75 grams per kilogram total body mass) using two protocols: one with a standard handle-bar grip (with grip) and one with supinated wrists (without-grip). Peak mechanical power, mean mechanical power, fatigue index and total mechanical work values were calculated for each subject during each test and the sample mean differences associated with the two protocols were compared using paired Student t-tests. The with-grip protocol yielded significantly greater peak mechanical power output than the without-grip protocol (886±124 W and 815±151 W, respectively), suggesting a significant upper body contribution to the maximum power output measured for the legs. As a first step towards quantifying the upper body involvement during leg cycle ergometry, surface electromyography of the forearm musculature was measured in a twelfth subject whilst performing each of the test protocols. During the with-grip ergometer tests, the intensity of electrical activity in the forearm musculature was similar, if not greater than, the intensity of electrical activity recorded for the forearm musculature during 100% maximum voluntary hand grip-dynamometer contractions, suggesting maximum isometric-type forearm muscle contraction during the with-grip leg ergometry tests. These findings suggest that the performance of traditional-style leg cycle ergometry requires a muscular contribution from the whole body. As such, researchers should be mindful of this, both in terms of the allocation of ergometer loads, and in the analysis of blood-borne metabolites.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)10-18
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Science and Medicine in Sport
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ergometry
Hand Strength
Leg
Hand
Forearm
Electromyography
Muscle Contraction
Wrist
Fatigue
Lower Extremity
Research Personnel
Students

Cite this

Baker, Julien ; Gal, Julianna ; Davies, Bruce ; Bailey, Damien ; Morgan, Rhian. / Power output of legs during high intensity cycle ergometry : influence of hand grip. In: Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2001 ; Vol. 4, No. 1. pp. 10-18.
@article{82caee23440340f8a6e8c2d7d0753024,
title = "Power output of legs during high intensity cycle ergometry: influence of hand grip",
abstract = "Traditionally, leg cycle ergometry is used to assess the power output of the lower limbs. However, it is suspected that the upper body makes a significant, albeit as yet unknown, contribution to the measured power output, and as such, the lean mass of the whole body should be considered during ergometric assessment. To test this idea, indices of mechanical power output were obtained from 11 subjects during high intensity leg cycle ergometry tests (20 second duration; 75 grams per kilogram total body mass) using two protocols: one with a standard handle-bar grip (with grip) and one with supinated wrists (without-grip). Peak mechanical power, mean mechanical power, fatigue index and total mechanical work values were calculated for each subject during each test and the sample mean differences associated with the two protocols were compared using paired Student t-tests. The with-grip protocol yielded significantly greater peak mechanical power output than the without-grip protocol (886±124 W and 815±151 W, respectively), suggesting a significant upper body contribution to the maximum power output measured for the legs. As a first step towards quantifying the upper body involvement during leg cycle ergometry, surface electromyography of the forearm musculature was measured in a twelfth subject whilst performing each of the test protocols. During the with-grip ergometer tests, the intensity of electrical activity in the forearm musculature was similar, if not greater than, the intensity of electrical activity recorded for the forearm musculature during 100{\%} maximum voluntary hand grip-dynamometer contractions, suggesting maximum isometric-type forearm muscle contraction during the with-grip leg ergometry tests. These findings suggest that the performance of traditional-style leg cycle ergometry requires a muscular contribution from the whole body. As such, researchers should be mindful of this, both in terms of the allocation of ergometer loads, and in the analysis of blood-borne metabolites.",
author = "Julien Baker and Julianna Gal and Bruce Davies and Damien Bailey and Rhian Morgan",
year = "2001",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S1440-2440(01)80003-7",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "10--18",
journal = "Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport",
issn = "1440-2440",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",
number = "1",

}

Power output of legs during high intensity cycle ergometry : influence of hand grip. / Baker, Julien; Gal, Julianna; Davies, Bruce; Bailey, Damien; Morgan, Rhian.

In: Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, Vol. 4, No. 1, 01.03.2001, p. 10-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Power output of legs during high intensity cycle ergometry

T2 - influence of hand grip

AU - Baker, Julien

AU - Gal, Julianna

AU - Davies, Bruce

AU - Bailey, Damien

AU - Morgan, Rhian

PY - 2001/3/1

Y1 - 2001/3/1

N2 - Traditionally, leg cycle ergometry is used to assess the power output of the lower limbs. However, it is suspected that the upper body makes a significant, albeit as yet unknown, contribution to the measured power output, and as such, the lean mass of the whole body should be considered during ergometric assessment. To test this idea, indices of mechanical power output were obtained from 11 subjects during high intensity leg cycle ergometry tests (20 second duration; 75 grams per kilogram total body mass) using two protocols: one with a standard handle-bar grip (with grip) and one with supinated wrists (without-grip). Peak mechanical power, mean mechanical power, fatigue index and total mechanical work values were calculated for each subject during each test and the sample mean differences associated with the two protocols were compared using paired Student t-tests. The with-grip protocol yielded significantly greater peak mechanical power output than the without-grip protocol (886±124 W and 815±151 W, respectively), suggesting a significant upper body contribution to the maximum power output measured for the legs. As a first step towards quantifying the upper body involvement during leg cycle ergometry, surface electromyography of the forearm musculature was measured in a twelfth subject whilst performing each of the test protocols. During the with-grip ergometer tests, the intensity of electrical activity in the forearm musculature was similar, if not greater than, the intensity of electrical activity recorded for the forearm musculature during 100% maximum voluntary hand grip-dynamometer contractions, suggesting maximum isometric-type forearm muscle contraction during the with-grip leg ergometry tests. These findings suggest that the performance of traditional-style leg cycle ergometry requires a muscular contribution from the whole body. As such, researchers should be mindful of this, both in terms of the allocation of ergometer loads, and in the analysis of blood-borne metabolites.

AB - Traditionally, leg cycle ergometry is used to assess the power output of the lower limbs. However, it is suspected that the upper body makes a significant, albeit as yet unknown, contribution to the measured power output, and as such, the lean mass of the whole body should be considered during ergometric assessment. To test this idea, indices of mechanical power output were obtained from 11 subjects during high intensity leg cycle ergometry tests (20 second duration; 75 grams per kilogram total body mass) using two protocols: one with a standard handle-bar grip (with grip) and one with supinated wrists (without-grip). Peak mechanical power, mean mechanical power, fatigue index and total mechanical work values were calculated for each subject during each test and the sample mean differences associated with the two protocols were compared using paired Student t-tests. The with-grip protocol yielded significantly greater peak mechanical power output than the without-grip protocol (886±124 W and 815±151 W, respectively), suggesting a significant upper body contribution to the maximum power output measured for the legs. As a first step towards quantifying the upper body involvement during leg cycle ergometry, surface electromyography of the forearm musculature was measured in a twelfth subject whilst performing each of the test protocols. During the with-grip ergometer tests, the intensity of electrical activity in the forearm musculature was similar, if not greater than, the intensity of electrical activity recorded for the forearm musculature during 100% maximum voluntary hand grip-dynamometer contractions, suggesting maximum isometric-type forearm muscle contraction during the with-grip leg ergometry tests. These findings suggest that the performance of traditional-style leg cycle ergometry requires a muscular contribution from the whole body. As such, researchers should be mindful of this, both in terms of the allocation of ergometer loads, and in the analysis of blood-borne metabolites.

U2 - 10.1016/S1440-2440(01)80003-7

DO - 10.1016/S1440-2440(01)80003-7

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 10

EP - 18

JO - Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

JF - Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

SN - 1440-2440

IS - 1

ER -