Positive thinking among slot machine gamblers: a case of maladaptive coping?

Jonathan Parke, Mark D. Griffiths, Adrian Parke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background:
Research has demonstrated that optimism and "positive illusions" can be used a coping mechanism among those facing adversity. Gamblers are a little studied group who also experience adversity and uncertainty. They often feel considerable levels of frustration, guilt, anger and a sense of feeling cheated after making significant losses. In order to deal with such feelings it is hypothesized that these individuals will search for positive consequences from their behaviour in order to offset this negative affect.
Objectives:
To (1) determine whether after gambling, gamblers compensate and reduce negative affect by identifying positive consequences from experiencing a loss, and (2) identify types of strategies which gamblers employ and consider how these should be classified.
Materials and Methods:
Eighty-seven regular slot machine gamblers were interviewed in a variety of environments housing slot machines. Each participant was asked a series of questions in a semi-structured format, to explore possible styles of positive thinking.
Results:
Nine types of 'positive thinking' experienced by gamblers were identified. These included Comparative thinking, Prophylactic thinking, Biased frequency thinking, Responsibility avoidance, Chasing Validation, Prioritization, Resourcefulness, Thoughtfulness, and Fear Reduction. Gamblers who were positive thinkers experienced significantly less guilt than non-positive thinkers.
Conclusions:
While reduction of negative affect may be perceived as positive in many other contexts, it is argued that it may counteract efforts to promote responsible gambling. Clinical implications and directions for future research are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)39-52
Number of pages14
JournalInternational Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Gambling
Guilt
Emotions
Frustration
Anger
Uncertainty
Fear
Research
Thinking
Optimism
Direction compound

Keywords

  • Cognitive bias
  • Gamblers
  • Gambling
  • Positive thinking
  • Slot machines

Cite this

@article{10d03649287a4043a40a917b0a793621,
title = "Positive thinking among slot machine gamblers: a case of maladaptive coping?",
abstract = "Background: Research has demonstrated that optimism and {"}positive illusions{"} can be used a coping mechanism among those facing adversity. Gamblers are a little studied group who also experience adversity and uncertainty. They often feel considerable levels of frustration, guilt, anger and a sense of feeling cheated after making significant losses. In order to deal with such feelings it is hypothesized that these individuals will search for positive consequences from their behaviour in order to offset this negative affect. Objectives: To (1) determine whether after gambling, gamblers compensate and reduce negative affect by identifying positive consequences from experiencing a loss, and (2) identify types of strategies which gamblers employ and consider how these should be classified. Materials and Methods: Eighty-seven regular slot machine gamblers were interviewed in a variety of environments housing slot machines. Each participant was asked a series of questions in a semi-structured format, to explore possible styles of positive thinking. Results:Nine types of 'positive thinking' experienced by gamblers were identified. These included Comparative thinking, Prophylactic thinking, Biased frequency thinking, Responsibility avoidance, Chasing Validation, Prioritization, Resourcefulness, Thoughtfulness, and Fear Reduction. Gamblers who were positive thinkers experienced significantly less guilt than non-positive thinkers. Conclusions: While reduction of negative affect may be perceived as positive in many other contexts, it is argued that it may counteract efforts to promote responsible gambling. Clinical implications and directions for future research are discussed.",
keywords = "Cognitive bias, Gamblers, Gambling, Positive thinking, Slot machines",
author = "Jonathan Parke and Griffiths, {Mark D.} and Adrian Parke",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11469-006-9049-1",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "39--52",
journal = "International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction",
issn = "1557-1874",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing AG",
number = "1",

}

Positive thinking among slot machine gamblers : a case of maladaptive coping? / Parke, Jonathan; Griffiths, Mark D.; Parke, Adrian.

In: International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction , Vol. 5, No. 1, 01.2007, p. 39-52.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Positive thinking among slot machine gamblers

T2 - a case of maladaptive coping?

AU - Parke, Jonathan

AU - Griffiths, Mark D.

AU - Parke, Adrian

PY - 2007/1

Y1 - 2007/1

N2 - Background: Research has demonstrated that optimism and "positive illusions" can be used a coping mechanism among those facing adversity. Gamblers are a little studied group who also experience adversity and uncertainty. They often feel considerable levels of frustration, guilt, anger and a sense of feeling cheated after making significant losses. In order to deal with such feelings it is hypothesized that these individuals will search for positive consequences from their behaviour in order to offset this negative affect. Objectives: To (1) determine whether after gambling, gamblers compensate and reduce negative affect by identifying positive consequences from experiencing a loss, and (2) identify types of strategies which gamblers employ and consider how these should be classified. Materials and Methods: Eighty-seven regular slot machine gamblers were interviewed in a variety of environments housing slot machines. Each participant was asked a series of questions in a semi-structured format, to explore possible styles of positive thinking. Results:Nine types of 'positive thinking' experienced by gamblers were identified. These included Comparative thinking, Prophylactic thinking, Biased frequency thinking, Responsibility avoidance, Chasing Validation, Prioritization, Resourcefulness, Thoughtfulness, and Fear Reduction. Gamblers who were positive thinkers experienced significantly less guilt than non-positive thinkers. Conclusions: While reduction of negative affect may be perceived as positive in many other contexts, it is argued that it may counteract efforts to promote responsible gambling. Clinical implications and directions for future research are discussed.

AB - Background: Research has demonstrated that optimism and "positive illusions" can be used a coping mechanism among those facing adversity. Gamblers are a little studied group who also experience adversity and uncertainty. They often feel considerable levels of frustration, guilt, anger and a sense of feeling cheated after making significant losses. In order to deal with such feelings it is hypothesized that these individuals will search for positive consequences from their behaviour in order to offset this negative affect. Objectives: To (1) determine whether after gambling, gamblers compensate and reduce negative affect by identifying positive consequences from experiencing a loss, and (2) identify types of strategies which gamblers employ and consider how these should be classified. Materials and Methods: Eighty-seven regular slot machine gamblers were interviewed in a variety of environments housing slot machines. Each participant was asked a series of questions in a semi-structured format, to explore possible styles of positive thinking. Results:Nine types of 'positive thinking' experienced by gamblers were identified. These included Comparative thinking, Prophylactic thinking, Biased frequency thinking, Responsibility avoidance, Chasing Validation, Prioritization, Resourcefulness, Thoughtfulness, and Fear Reduction. Gamblers who were positive thinkers experienced significantly less guilt than non-positive thinkers. Conclusions: While reduction of negative affect may be perceived as positive in many other contexts, it is argued that it may counteract efforts to promote responsible gambling. Clinical implications and directions for future research are discussed.

KW - Cognitive bias

KW - Gamblers

KW - Gambling

KW - Positive thinking

KW - Slot machines

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/positive-thinking-among-slot-machine-gamblers-case-maladaptive-coping

U2 - 10.1007/s11469-006-9049-1

DO - 10.1007/s11469-006-9049-1

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 39

EP - 52

JO - International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction

JF - International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction

SN - 1557-1874

IS - 1

ER -