Persistent conditioned place preference to cocaine and withdrawal hypo-locomotion to mephedrone in the flatworm planaria

Claire V. Hutchinson, Jose Prados, Colin Davidson*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to determine the effects of exposure to cocaine and mephedrone on conditioned place preference (CPP) and locomotion in the flatworm planaria. Planaria were treated with either cocaine or mephedrone at 1 or 10 μM. Planaria were exposed to 15 min of drug in their non-preferred place (either a rough- or smooth-floored petri dish) on alternate days, and were exposed to normal water in their preferred place on the following day. There were 5 days of conditioning to drug. Planaria were then tested for CPP on day 2, 6 and 13 after withdrawal. We found that animals exhibited CPP to cocaine at both 1 and 10 μM, but not to mephedrone. When examining locomotor activity we found that neither cocaine nor mephedrone treatment showed any evidence of evoking increased motility or locomotor sensitisation. Hypo-motility was seen on the first day of conditioning at concentrations of 10 μM for both cocaine and mephedrone, but had disappeared by the last day of conditioning. Examining chronic withdrawal, only 10 μM mephedrone had a significant effect on motility, decreasing locomotion on day 2 of withdrawal. Taken together we have shown that cocaine evoked CPP in planaria. We have also shown withdrawal depressing effects of mephedrone on motility.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)19-23
Number of pages5
JournalNeuroscience Letters
Volume593
Early online date13 Mar 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Apr 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • planaria
  • cocaine
  • mephedrone
  • conditioned place preference
  • locomotion
  • withdrawal

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Persistent conditioned place preference to cocaine and withdrawal hypo-locomotion to mephedrone in the flatworm planaria'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this